Active clinical trials for "Pancreatic Fistula"

This is a single arm investigator-initiated study designed to test the feasibility and potential efficacy of preoperative lanreotide to reduce the risk of postoperative abscess or pancreatic leak and fistula. All consenting patients undergoing planned elective pancreaticoduodenectomy or distal pancreatectomy for malignancy or suspected malignancy will be treated with a single deep subcutaneous dose of lanreotide prior to planned resection on the day of surgery. Following this intervention, care will be based on standard treatment protocols. Sixty-day mortality and morbidity will be collected for all patients.

Despite improvements and advances in pancreas surgery, about 30-35% of patients who have pancreas surgery develop a type of complication called a pancreatic fistula. A pancreatic fistula occurs when fluid produced by the pancreas leaks into the abdomen after pancreas surgery. Patients who develop a pancreatic fistula can have poor short-term and long-term consequences.We are studying the effect of a medical device named HEMOPATCH on the development and seriousness of pancreatic fistulas. HEMOPATCH is a thin, flexible bovine protein-based pad that may improve tissue sealing where it is applied during surgery. Some small studies called case studies of between 2 and 7 patients, and two clinical trials have shown that HEMOPATCH is effective at stopping bleeding and reducing drain output after some types of surgery. However, there have been no completed clinical trials using HEMOPATCH to prevent or reduce pancreatic fistulas in patients having pancreas surgery, so we don't know if it works in this setting. Health Canada has approved the use of HEMOPATCH as a device to stop bleeding or seal other bodily fluids for procedures in which the control of bleeding or leakage of other body fluids or air by standard surgical techniques are either ineffective or impractical.

Evaluation of sun scoring system for predication of pancreatic fistula after Pancreaticoduodenectomy to facilitate timely intervention after Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Distal pancreas resection is a relatively rare procedure with a known risk of postoperative pancreatic fistula. Until quite recently, no valid risk prediction models for this have been available. In 2022 two different risk scores DISPAIR and D-FRS were published. The aim of this study is to compare, validate and possibly improve those scores in a international retrospective multicenter cohort.

The aim of this study is to investigate whether finnish binding pancreatico-jejunal anastomosis is feasible and prevents the risk for post operative pancreatic fistula after distal pancreeatectomy.

The aim of the study is to test the hypothesis that intraarterial bolus application of 500 µg Octreotide in the gastroduodenal artery during the resectional phase of pancreatoduodenectomy in patients with soft pancreatic tissue hardens the texture of the pancreatic remnant. A primary end-point of the study is a change in pancreatic texture. A secondary end-point is the rate of postoperative pancreatic fistula.

Dividing pancreas when performing left-sided resections opens the risk for leakage from the divided end of the pancreas. Pancreatic juices could have a severe effect on surrounding abdominal tissues with abscess formation producing systemic inflammation and potential lethal bleeding. Proper drainage of pancreatic juices is the primary treatment. Effective drainage reduces healing time. A pancreatic stent could theoretically improve the drainage of pancreatic juice into the duodenum and by this shorten the healing time still further. Pre operative prophylactic stenting of the pancreas before division of the parenchyma has not shown a positive effect on fistula formation. In an open randomized multicenter clinical trial we want to test the hypothesis that a reduced fistula healing time, in left sided pancreatic resections, could be reduced by introducing a pancreatic stent when on post operative day 3 or later a B och C fistula (according to the International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula, ISGPF) is diagnosed by randomizing between pancreatic stent with drains versus only drains.

Dividing pancreas when performing left-sided resections opens the risk for leakage from the divided end of the pancreas. Pancreatic juices could have a severe effect on surrounding abdominal tissues with abscess formation producing systemic inflammation and potential lethal bleeding. Studies have shown that reinforcement of the staple line when dividing pancreas could reduce the risk of leakage. Surgisis (COOK Medical) a product already in use for staple line reinforcement in gastric and lung surgery could be used as a reinforcement when stapling pancreas in left sided resections. In a prospective randomized trial we want to compare Surgisis reinforcement to no reinforcement of stapled division in left sided pancreatic resections. Primary outcome is pancreatic fistula yes/no.

Pancreatic fistula (PF) represents the Achille's heel of pancreatic surgery and is the main cause of postoperative morbidity since it can determine the onset of others complications such as abdominal abscesses, surgical wound infections, sepsis and bleeding, that can sometimes be fatal. During a previous study conducted at the University Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, Department of General Surgery there were identified cut-offs of amylase levels on the abdominal drainage fluid dosed in I postoperative day (POD1) and III postoperative day (POD3) which can significantly predict PF and in particular clinically relevant fistulas as well as abdominal collections and biliary fistulas, if related to some specific findings of the abdominal CT routine performed in POD3. The aim of this research project is to validate the cut-offs of the amylase levels on drainage fluid identified during the previous research in order to identify patients at risk of clinically relevant PF and to validate the use of abdomen CT without contrast in POD3 in patients with increased risk of biliary fistula.

Background and aim: Distal pancreatectomy (DP) is often performed for primary benign or malignant lesions occurred in the body or tail of the pancreas. The occurrence of pancreatic fistula (PF) after DP remains high, ranging from 5% to 60%, despite in high-volume centers. Management of pancreatic stump to prevent PF has been a long-standing issue in pancreatic surgery. Our group has proposed greater omentum binding as a novel approach to secure pancreatic stump with the purpose of reducing PF. With respect to the previous preliminary data which demonstrated greater omentum binding of pancreatic stump significantly reduced the occurrence of PF based on a small prospective cohort, we therefore aimed to verify the safety and effectiveness of this novel approach in a large prospective randomized cohort. Method: TJBDPS06 is a prospective, randomized controlled, parallel-group, superiority trial in a single high-volume pancreatic center. A total of 200 patients who will receive DP and fulfill the inclusion criteria will be randomly allocated to the greater omentum binding group or the group without this step in an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) setting. The trial hypothesize that greater omentum binding of pancreatic stump could safely and effectively secure pancreatic stump following DP, therefore reducing the occurrence of PF. The primary outcome is PF within 90 days after DP. The secondary outcomes are overall morbidly, mortality, and major complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥III) within 90 days following DP. The duration of entire trial is presumably three years, including prearrangement, two-year inclusion period, and data analysis. Discussion: The current trial will be the first in demonstrating safety and effectiveness of greater omentum binding of pancreatic stump following DP in a large high-volume pancreatic center. This approach will offer an inexpensive, technically easy, and secure coverage technique for the pancreatic stump in DP and may be particularly useful for patients with a soft pancreas which is a markedly risk factor of PF.