Active clinical trials for "Atrial Fibrillation"

1. Purpose of the study 1) To compare clinical outcome, procedure time, complication rate of patients who were changed to paroxysmal atrial fibrillation from persistent atrial fibrillation between ablation with conventional pulmonary vein isolation and ablation with conventional pulmonary vein isolation with conventional linear ablation. 2. Scientific evidence of the study In atrial fibrillation patients, the maintenance of normal sinus rhythm showed significant reduction of mortality. drug therapy with anti-arrhythmic drug showed many complications and side effect, thus non-drug therapy such as catheter ablation is developed. catheter ablation has been performed for 10years world-wide, and showed superior treatment outcome compared with drug therapy. However, there are no consensus for proper ablation strategy in patients who were changed to paroxysmal atrial fibrillation from persistent atrial fibrillation . additional ablation make extent of myocardial injury and paradoxically increase recurrence rate, thus still controversial. Therefore, we will compare conventional pulmonary vein isolation with additional conventional linear ablation. 3. Methods Treatment of All patients with atrial fibrillation is performed according to the standard treatment guideline of atrial fibrillation. there is no additional blood sampling, imaging study, or any other invasive procedure according to the inclusion of the study. 4. study contents 1) to evaluate superior ablation strategy in patients who were changed to paroxysmal atrial fibrillation from persistent atrial fibrillation compare conventional pulmonary vein isolation with additional liner ablation, both strategies are conventional ablation strategies being performed world-wide.

Brief summary: The objective of this study is to compare two different ablation strategies in participants with persistent atrial fibrillation and fibrotic areas in the left atrium. The participant will be randomized to pulmonary vein isolation or pulmonary vein isolation plus ablation of fibrotic areas.

OPTIMAS is a large, prospective, partially blinded randomised controlled trial of early (within ≤4 days [96hrs]) or standard (between day 7 and day 14 after stroke onset) initiation of anticoagulation after stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), using any licensed dose of a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC). The trial will use a non-inferiority gatekeeper approach to test for non-inferiority of early anticoagulation followed by a test for superiority, if non-inferiority is established.

The ASPIRIN LAAO trial is a prospective, multi-center, randomized, double blinded, placebo-controlled study aiming at investigating the safety of terminating the use of aspirin after left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO). Patients diagnosed with atrial fibrillation and have undergone LAAO will be enrolled in this study. Randomization will be performed at 6 months post-implant. The randomization program electronically assigns the patient 1:1 to either the Aspirin group or the control group. Study patients assigned to Aspirin group will receive enteric coated aspirin (100 mg/day). The control group receives placebo. After the randomization, subjects of both groups will have follow-up visits at 6 and 12 months and then every 12 months until 24 months after the last patient recruitment. For each group, 560 patients will be included, with an estimated total number of 1120 participants in this clinical study. Patients will be followed up until 24 months after the last enrollment. The primary endpoint is a composite consisting of stroke, systemic embolism, cardiovascular or unexplainable death, acute coronary syndrome, coronary artery disease or periphery vascular disease requiring revascularization and major bleeding. The secondary endpoints are all-cause death, device related thrombus, minor bleeding and rehospitalization due to heart failure.

A multi-center, randomized trial to examine the effect of aggressive risk factor control and arrhythmia trigger-based intervention on recurrence of atrial fibrillation.

This clinical trial is designed to compare two management strategies for the treatment of asymptomatic/subclinical atrial fibrillation after ablation based on data from the Biotronik ICM (BioMonitor3® or future generation of Biotronik ICM).

The purpose of this study is to examine if sending mild electrical signals just under your skin will improve atrial fibrillation symptoms by controlling your heart rate.

Obesity is a well-established risk factor for the development of atrial fibrillation (AF), while the reduction of body weight was shown to reduce the risk of AF. However, little is known about the effect of different weight-reducing interventions on AF burden. The study will evaluate the effect of a complex program aimed at weight reduction on AF burden in subjects after catheter ablation for AF and at least 1st degree obesity. This will be investigated in randomized study design and compared with patients receiving standard care without specific obesity-related intervention. The weight loss program will consist of diet, lifestyle and exercise counselling and, in selected subjects, also bariatric surgery in order to achieve a sustained weight loss of >10% of initial body weight. Secondary aims include identification of patient phenotypes with the most benefits from weight reduction as well as elucidation of potential pathomechanisms linking obesity and AF, with the main focus being on low-grade inflammation. The project will help to define the optimal weight-reducing regimen in AF and to tailor the interventions to individual patient needs.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a type of irregular heart rhythm due to electrical signal disturbances of the heart. It is a very common arrhythmia and the risk of developing AF increases with age and with other risk factors such as diabetes, high blood pressure, and underlying heart disease. The main complications of AF are heart failure and stroke. However, studies have shown that restoration of normal rhythm does not reduce these complications. Rather, these complications are mitigated by controlling the heart rate and using blood thinners to prevent stroke. Symptoms secondary to AF can occur due to the irregular heart rate and poor contraction in the atria, the top chambers of the heart. These symptoms include shortness of breath, fatigue, reduced exercise tolerance, and palpitations. Restoring sinus rhythm can sometimes alleviate these symptoms. Given that studies to date have not shown a difference in hard clinical endpoints between rate and rhythm control strategies, the decision to proceed with rhythm control depends on the patient symptom burden. Rhythm control strategies in patients with persistent AF include cardioversion back to sinus rhythm with long-term recurrence prevention via anti-arrhythmic drugs (AADs) or catheter ablation. However, many studies of these procedures omit a sham placebo control arm. No atrial fibrillation procedural intervention has been compared to a sham procedure. The cardioversion procedure can easily be compared to a "sham" alternative, as it is non-invasive with an expected response within days-to-weeks. Thus, a cardioversion versus "sham" cardioversion trial will allow us to truly assess the impact of a rhythm-control strategy on QOL. It is hypothesized that cardioversion of atrial fibrillation leads to significant improvement in quality of life (QOL) compared to sham cardioversion. Understanding the true QOL impact of sinus rhythm restoration in patients with persistent AF is of significant importance in guiding strategies for the management of AF. Hence, by evaluating what the true effect of cardioversion on QOL in this blinded study, we can better understand the role of medical management and AF ablation in our patients and assess resource allocation to these procedures.

The study is a prospective, two-arm, randomized, open-label, blinded endpoint, multi-center study to investigate the impact of first line ablation in patients presenting at the emergency room with recent-onset paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation.