Active clinical trials for "Atrial Fibrillation"

Adenosine is used clinically to assess permanency of electrical isolation of pulmonary veins during atrial fibrillation ablation, however, the methodology has not been validated either in terms of the reproducibility of the adenosine response or the effect on clinical outcomes, namely whether using pulmonary vein reconnection to guide additional ablation lowers rate recurrent atrial fibrillation post ablation. Study will test the hypothesis that the response to adenosine used in this manner is reproducible over time.

To verify if the screening opportunistic of Atrial Fibrillation (AF) by means of the measurement of the arterial peripheral pulse is more effective than the habitual practice for the early detection of AF in 65-year-old who come to Primary care

Ablation of atrial fibrillation is a well established treatment method to restore normal sinus rhythm and eliminate the need for continued antiarrhythmic therapy and anticoagulation. Absence of symptomatic and asymptomatic atrial fibrillation should be considered necessary for discontinuation of anticoagulation therapy. Presently, recurrence of atrial fibrillation is usually determined with the use of a non looping event monitor which is typically used by the subject at the time of symptomatic arrhythmia. This method does not detect asymptomatic atrial fibrillation. Random asymptomatic recording can be added, but the chance for detecting recurrence of arrhythmia is not great. Too frequently, the success rates of AF ablation procedures are inflated by insufficient follow up and patient's limited compliance in reporting and recording episodes of recurrent arrhythmias. Often times, it is very inconvenient for patients to wear external event recorders. Allergies to the sticky pads that are needed for most of the external monitoring devices continues to be a problem. Implantable loop recorders have the advantage of detecting symptomatic and asymptomatic atrial fibrillation continuously. They also offer the convenience of monitoring for up to 18 to 24 months without significant patient discomfort. However, implantation and explantation of these devices involves a limited surgical procedure as well as considerable experience. In this study we attempt to assess the differences in these two types of monitoring systems in assessing the long term efficacy of AF ablation.

The primary aim of the study is to assess the efficacy of continuous rhythm monitoring with an implantable loop recorder (ILR) compared to conventional ambulatory electrocardiography in detecting episodes of atrial fibrillation after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). The secondary aim is to assess the efficacy of PVI during a two years follow-up and to assess the reliability of the implantable loop recorder in detecting atrial fibrillation. 50 patients will be enrolled into the study. After enrollment an implantable loop recorder will be implanted at least 6 weeks before scheduled PVI. All patients will be followed for 24 months after PVI. During the follow-up period a 72-hours ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring will be performed at 1, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. Transthoracic echocardiography will be performed at enrollment, 3, 12, and 24 months after PVI. Moreover, quality of life will be assessed at baseline, and 6 and 12 months after PVI.

The objective of this study is to determine if concentrations of amiodarone in fat tissue increases constantly over time during chronic treatment with this drug, and if blood concentrations reflect accurately the concentrations in fat tissue or not. This is because excessive concentrations of this drug in tissues can produce adverse effects.

The purpose of this study is to find out if specialized programs in the AT500 and EnRhythm pacemakers will reduce the number of irregular heartbeat in the upper chamber of the heart and reduce symptoms (such as shortness of breath, dizziness, and others).

The purpose of this study is to determine whether postoperatively oral treatment with high dosis amiodarone for five days after intravenously admitted bolusinfusion will minimize the risk for development of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting.

The aim of this study is to test the impact of the managed ventricular pacing (MVP) mode and atrial preventive and antitachycardia pacing therapies on the reduction of a composite clinical outcome composed of any death, permanent atrial fibrillation, and cardiovascular hospitalizations.

The primary objective of this trial is to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of dabigatran etexilate in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism.

This is an exploratory investigation of safety, pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) effects of BAY59-7939 with multiple oral doses of 10 mg, 15 mg and 20 mg once daily (od) in Japanese subjects with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (originally described in Japanese).