Active clinical trials for "Atrial Fibrillation"

The purpose of this randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled, superiority clinical trial was to assess clinical efficacy of potassium canrenoate - canrenone in rapid conversion of atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm.

To compare of atrial arrhythmia incidence in patients with coronary artery disease and atrial fibrillation history, undergoing either coronary artery bypass grafting plus temporary spinal cord stimulation or coronary artery bypass grafting alone

The recent development of novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs), including direct thrombin inhibitor (dabigatran) and factor Xa inhibitors (rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban), could potentially overcome many drawbacks of warfarin, and might provide a safer, and even more effective and convenient alternative approach to warfarin in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), especially in Asians. According to the results of a meta-analysis comparing Asians and non-Asians, NOACs are preferentially indicated in Asians in terms of both efficacy and safety. There is no randomized controlled trial with sufficient power to directly compare the efficacy and safety among NOACs in NVAF, not to speak of Asians and Chinese. Indirect comparisons are only based on observation with a lot of limitations such as heterogeneous background characteristics, difference in study design, and diversity in time within therapeutic range in control group. The findings from indirect comparisons are not conclusive but only hypothesis-generating. This investigator-initiated prospective randomized open blinded end-point clinical trial will directly compare the efficacy and safety among 3 NOACs in patients with NVAF in Taiwan. We hypothesize that rivaroxaban or apixaban is non-inferior to dabigatran in terms of the efficacy.

The purpose of this trial is to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of dabigatran etexilate and different intensity warfarin for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.

Cardiovascular diseases are the number 1 cause of death globally and represent a major economic burden on health care systems. The investigators have developed a novel integrated care concept (NICC) which combines telemedicine with intensive support by a call center, an integrated care network including in- and outpatient care providers and guideline therapy for patients with heart failure (HF), atrial fibrillation (AF) or therapy resistant hypertension (TRH). The aim of the study is to show that NICC is preferable over guideline therapy alone. We aim at including approximately 890 patients. Patients could be enrolled either directly at the Care-Center (location: University Hospital of Rostock) or at one of the advanced treatments rooms of the Care-Center (outpatient cardiological specialist practices). The ethics commission's statement of the University of Rostock is available for amendment 2 since 20.08.2019 at the number A2017-0117.

The study goal is to conduct a randomized controlled trial to compare safety and accuracy of dosing based on clinical information including the clinical reason for your taking coumadin, your age, gender, your body surface area, and other medical conditions you may have with dosing estimated by a dosing calculator which adjusts for factors affecting coumadin dosing variability including genotypes for genes important in Coumadin metabolism and response. The hypothesis to be tested by this trial states that:when compared to patients managed with a best practices standard-of-care coumadin dosing regimen, patients randomized to coumadin dosing based on genetically programmed metabolic capacity and other known clinical and environmental factors affecting dose will: 1)show reduced risk of adverse events (using surrogate measures of such events); and 2)more rapidly achieve Coumadin dosing.

To demonstrate that in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation who had recovered normal sinus rhythm and treated with the best recommended therapies, the addition of 1 gram / daily of n-3 PUFA is superior to the corresponding placebo for the maintenance of normal sinus rhythm at one year of follow up.

RESTORE SR II is a feasibility study on the minimally invasive use of the AtriCure Bipolar System for PV Isolation on a beating heart for the treatment of all types of atrial fibrillation in a sole therapy operation (not concomitant to another cardiac operation).

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is used to treat dilated heart failure with discoordinate contraction. Dyssynchrony typically stems from electrical delay leading to mechanical delay between the septal and lateral walls. Right ventricular apical pacing might be associated with long-term adverse effects on left ventricular function, and alternative pacing sites such as high septal or RVOT has been suggested. Previous studies have however been conflicting. The aim of this study is to determine if bi-ventricular pacing from RVOT + LV is better than RVapex+LV. To avoid influence from possible atrial delay only patients with chronic atrial fibrillation are included. All patients will receive a bi-ventricular pacemaker with 3 leads placed in RVapex, RVOT and via coronary sinus to pace the left ventricle. After a run in period (to determine if AV-junction ablation is necessary) the patients are randomised to one of the following pacing configurations: RVOT+LV or RVapex+LV with cross-over after 3 month.

The purpose of the study is to look at the differences between people who have irregular heart beats coming from the upper chamber of the heart (atrial fibrillation) compared to those who do not have these irregular beats.