Active clinical trials for "Atrial Fibrillation"

This is the first in man study of E-SeaLATM developed and manufactured by Hangzhou Dinova EP Technology Co., Ltd, which can achieve pulsed field ablation and mechanical closure of the Left Atrial Appendage simultaneously, this study aims to initially verify the safety and efficacy of the device.

SAFE-LAAC CKD Trial has been designed to gather data on the most optimal strategy of antiplatelet therapy after transcatheter left atrial appendage occlusion with Amplatzer or WATCHMAN device in patients with the end-stage renal disease treated with chronic haemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis

The objective of CABA-HFPEF is to test whether catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) can prevent adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with heart failure with preserved (HFpEF) or mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF).

The purpose of this study is to assess the performance and safety of using the investigational catheter.

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the effect of catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation on cognitive function in patients with mild cognitive impairment. Participants will be randomized into antiarrhythmic drugs alone or atrial fibrillation ablation + antiarrhythmic drugs.

The increased risk of Atrial fibrillation (AF) regarding thromboembolic stroke is predominantly due to the formation and embolization of clots from within the left atrial appendage (LAA). Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is a nonpharmacological strategy for stroke prevention in patients with AF. Data from randomized trials, including PROTECT-AF, PREVAIL, and Prague-17, have suggested that LAAO has comparable efficacy to warfarin or NOACs. Considering these results, LAAO was recommended by the American College of Cardiology (ACC) and European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines as a non-pharmacological stroke prevention strategy for patients with NVAF who have contraindications or are unsuitable for OAC. The PROTECT-AF and PREVAIL trials stipulated the use of standardized antithrombotic medications which were designed to minimize the risk of stroke, systemic embolism, or device-related thrombosis. This antithrombotic strategy was subsequently endorsed by the guidelines, briefly, patients with LAAO were discharged on warfarin and aspirin for 45 days post-LAAO, if there was no leak or a leak ≤5 mm under transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) at 45-day follow-up, antithrombotic strategies shall switch to dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) until 6 months post-LAAO, and then aspirin thereafter. Although LAAO was recommended by medical societies, previous patient-level meta-analyses have implied that compared with oral anticoagulation, LAAO had significantly more ischemic strokes, suggesting the inability of LAAO to prevent an ischemic stroke from sources beyond LAA. Will a combined strategy of LAAO and OAC further reduce the risk of stroke? The investigators hypothesized that a long-term low dose-Rivaroxaban (10mg daily) post-LAAO might be a potent supplement to the residue risk of ischemic stroke.

"Afib" is a common irregular heartbeat. Afib can cause stroke, blood clots, dementia and death. Medicines used to treat Afib often do not work well and can cause serious side effects. Clinicians need medicines that work better for Afib. Medicines for Afib work by blocking a current in the heart called a potassium current. There is a newer potassium current called IKas that can contribute to Afib. A medicine called ondansetron is used to keep people with cancer from getting sick to their stomach and throwing up. The investigators have found that ondansetron blocks IKas, and the investigators think that this means that ondansetron may work well to treat Afib. So, in this study the investigators want to find out if ondansetron can: 1) Stop Afib, 2) Reduce the amount of time that people have Afib, and 3) Slow down the heart rate when people have Afib. The investigators will study 80 people who come to the hospital to have a small electric shock to stop their Afib. These patients will be assigned by chance (like flipping a coin) to one of two groups: ondansetron 8 mg by mouth twice daily or a sugar pill (placebo). The people in the study will not know whether they are receiving ondansetron or placebo. The ondansetron or placebo will be started 2 days before the electric shock. The investigators will find out if ondansetron stops the Afib in the 2 days before their electric shock is scheduled. If ondansetron stops the Afib, those people will not need the electric shock. The other people in the study will get the electric shock to stop their Afib, but this does not work in everyone, and the Afib can quickly come back. So, after the first 2 days, all people in the study will stay on ondansetron or placebo for 28 more days. The investigators will find out if ondansetron reduces the percentage of time that people are in Afib. Also, in the 2 days before the electric shock and in the 28 days after, the investigators will find out if ondansetron slows the heart rate while people are having Afib. The investigators will compare the people in the study who take ondansetron with the people in the study who take placebo. This research will help the investigators to find out if ondansetron can be used as a medicine for people who have Afib.

A randomised controlled trial to assess the efficacy of staged hybrid ablation when compared with standard catheter ablation in patients with non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF)

A prospective, two-arm, multi-center, randomized, open-label, pre-market, First-in-Human clinical study designed to provide safety and performance data regarding the use of the Adagio PFA and PFCA Systems in the treatment of PsAF.

This study will compare right sided atrioventricular node ablation to left sided atrioventricular node ablation