Active clinical trials for "Pneumonia, Bacterial"

To compare the efficacy and safety of tigecycline with those of levofloxacin in the treatment of subjects with CAP requiring hospitalization. The co-primary efficacy endpoints in the study will be the clinical response in the clinically evaluable population and the clinical response in the clinical modified intent-to-treat population at the TOC visit. The primary efficacy analyses will first determine whether tigecycline is noninferior to levofloxacin. If tigecycline is found to be noninferior, the analyses will determine whether tigecycline is statistically better than levofloxacin.

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of aerosolized colistin on to ventilated patients with carbapenem-resistant gram negative bacteria pneumonia. We hypothesize that adjunct aerosolized colistin, which achieve high drug concentrations in the airway, would more effectively treat the penumbra.

Introduction: Acute Heart Failure is frequently decompensated by pulmonary infection, but the diagnosis of pulmonary infection sometimes is difficult in these patients due to similar signals and clinical symptoms in both pathologies. Furthermore, when it is possible the diagnosis of pulmonary infection, physicians may have difficult to determine etiology and delaying antibiotic therapy. Procalcitonin (PCT) have been used like a biomarker to determine the period of use of antibiotics in patients with acute respiratory infections. It is specific for bacterial infections and it have showed as a marker of severity infection and may help to determine interruption period of antibiotic therapy in a safety way for the patient. Aim: Evaluate levels of PCT related to interruption of antibiotics in patients with decompensated acute heart failure (DAHF) with suspected bacterial pulmonary infection. Methods: In this pilot project will be included around 100 patients, randomized in two groups: group A (PCT levels may guide the interruption of antibiotic at day 5) or group B (antibiotic period will be determined by the physician without the knowledge of PCT levels). Will be collected laboratorial and clinical data at days 0,3 and 5. Both groups will be compared to evaluate PCT levels and total period of antibiotic therapy, hospitalization and readmission in 30 days. This study will determine the sensibility/specificity of PCT in patients with DAHF.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of omadacycline as compared to moxifloxacin in the treatment of adults with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia.

The purpose of this study is to determine the best treatment for children with a fluid collection in the chest associated with an underlying pneumonia. Researchers generally agree that a child with a large fluid collection in the chest need to have the fluid drained in addition to anitbiotics. There have been many treatments studied in children that have been shown to be effective and safe, but the treatments have never been compared to each other in a randomized controlled study. The optimal treatment of pediatric parapneumonic effusions remains controversial. The objective of this study is to compare the use of conventional management (antibiotics with thoracostomy tube placement) with primary thorascopic drainage (see protocol). Our hypothesis is that pediatric patients with parapneumonic effusion, regardless of pleural fluid composition and loculations, have decreased morbidity when treated with early thoroscopic adhesiolysis (VATS) compared with conservative treatment.

Antibiotic resistance has been identified by the WHO as one of the biggest threats to the health of the world population. In Denmark, there has been an increasing focus on optimizing antibiotic consumption in recent years, but despite significant efforts, total consumption has increased in the hospital sector, especially regarding consumption and in the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. Currently, a pneumonia diagnosis is primarily based on clinical symptoms such as cough, shortness of breath, chest pain, fever and sputum production, combined with X-ray of the lungs, relevant blood tests and microbiological analysis of sputum samples. X-ray is however an imprecise diagnostic tool, and sputum assays responses are available after 2 days. Sputum can be cultivated to determine the bacterial agent. However, the sputum samples are often of poor quality and many patients cannot deliver a sample. A recently published Danish study shows, that only half of the patients at the ED have sputum samples collected for culturing and none of them had the antibiotic treatment adjusted based on the microbiological results of the sputum. This study's hypothesis is that point-of-care-polymerase chain reaction (POC-PCR) is superior to standard care on the prescription of targeted pneumonia treatment.

Study to Determine the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy of Oral Nafithromycin Versus Oral Moxifloxacin in the Treatment of Community-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia (CABP) in Adults

The purpose of this randomised, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase Ib/IIa study is to assess the safety, tolerability and efficacy of eASCs (Cx611) administered intravenously as adjunctive therapy, therefore in addition to standard of care (SoC) therapy, to patients with severe community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (sCABP). The completion of this study will contribute to the basic knowledge on stem cells and their mode-of-action, and has a large translational character, i.e. to document the safety and explore the efficacy of Cx611 in patients with sCABP.

Unasyn-S 12g/day (3 g four times a day) is the commonly used dosage depending on the severity for US, EU, China, Taiwan and Korea for over 20 years, however, Unasyn-S 12g/day has not yet been approved in Japan. The purpose of this trial is to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety in Japanese adult subjects with community acquired pneumonia receiving ampicillin sodium/sulbactam sodium, 12g/day (3 g four times a day ) IV.

To demonstrate that colistin iv. is not inferior to meropenem in empiric treatment of VAP regarding the final point of primary efficacy: mortality in the 28 subsequent days and clinical healing in patients clinically evaluated. To compare the safety of treatment with colistin vs meropenem in VAP. To compare microbiological efficacy of treatment with colistin vs meropenem in VAP