Active clinical trials for "Periodontal Pocket"

Objective: To evaluate the adjunctive effect of hyaluronic acid (HA) gel in the treatment of residual periodontal pockets over a 12-month period. Materials and Methods: Periodontal patients enrolled in maintenance and presenting at least one periodontal pocket 5-9 mm of depth in the anterior area were recruited from six university-based centers. Each patient was randomly assigned to control treatment with professional mechanical plaque removal (PMPR) and local placebo application or test treatment with the adjunctive use of HA to PMPR. Clinical parameters [i.e. probing depth (PD), bleeding on probing (BoP), plaque score, recession (REC), and clinical attachment loss (CAL)] and microbiological samples for the investigation of the total bacterial count (TBC) and presence of specific bacterial strains (Porphyromonas gingivalis, Treponema denticola, Tannerella forsythia, Fusobacterium nucleatum) were taken at baseline and every 3 months, until study termination. PD was determined as the primary outcome variable.

Periodontitis is an inflammatory disease that destroys tooth-supporting structures through oral bacterial plaque. ozone gel's act as an antimicrobial effect as an adjunct to conventional periodontal therapy (scaling and root planning). exposure of bacteria to ozone leads to the oxidation of the phospholipids and lipoproteins that comprise the bacterial cell membrane. Ozone gel has the potential to play an anti-inflammatory role in the treatment of periodontitis by monitoring both clinical and biological parameters.

Primary objective To measure the gingival crevicular levels of A.actinomycetemcomitans and P.gingivalis after intra-pocket application of diode laser in severe periodontitis (stage 3 grade C) patients. Secondary objective To compare the levels of the same microorganisms as in cases of diode laser therapy to those after conventional treatment with systemic antibiotic administration in severe periodontitis (stage 3 grade C) patients. to measure clinical parameters probing depth,attachment loss and mobility grade

The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the efficiencies of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF), concentrated growth factor (CGF) and autologous bone graft (ABG) in the treatment of patients who have intrabony pockets clinically and to assess the alveolar bone gain (AB gain) radiographically ((Panoramic X-ray and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) X-ray)).

Clinical evaluation of local administration of injectable PRF (injectable platelet-rich fibrin) in periodontal pockets as adjunctive therapy to scaling and root planing. 15 periodontal patients will receive a through traditional mechanical treatment (scaling and root planing). Each patient will receive subgingival i-PRF injected in half mouth and the opposite side will be injected with saline, immediately after the deep scaling session.

In this Randomized clinical trial locally delivered moxifloxacin in situ gel was evaluated as an adjunct to scaling and root planing for efficacy in the treatment of chronic periodontitis and for short-term effects on the periodontal microflora.

The aim of this prospective randomized controlled clinical trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of chlorhexidine intracanal medicament along with periodontal treatment in concomitant endodontic periodontal lesions with communication in terms of periodontal healing. Forty-seven patients were randomly divided into: group 1: conventional endodontic treatment with open flap debridement (OFD after 3 month of endodontic treatment) were performed, in group 2: endodontic treatment with 2% chlorhexidine gel (CHX) as an intracanal medicament placed in root canals and after 3 month OFD were performed. Primary outcome variables included probing pocket depth, clinical attachment level and bleeding on probing.

Introduction: To evaluate the effect of untreated endodontic infection on periodontal status in untreated non vital teeth with periapical radiolucency as compared to contralateral vital teeth. And also to evaluate the role of endodontic treatment on periodontal healing in successfully endodontically treated teeth with contralateral vital teeth. Methods: This study was performed in two parts. First part of this study was an observational cross sectional survey and second part was a clinical trial on patients selected from the survey.

This study is being performed to compare different methods of visualization during routine gum surgery. The gum surgery is standard of care. This study will compare the use of a small camera (videoscope) in conjunction with magnification glasses during surgery vs. surgery only using magnification glasses. Both methods are routinely used and are standard of care methods of visualization. The small camera (videoscope) is a device which allows us to see the area under high magnification and projects live video feed on a computer screen. The study is a split-mouth design pilot study. The patients are only receiving treatment that was previously diagnosed prior to entering the study. The treatment performed is standard treatment that fits in the routine standard of care. No interventional treatment is being performed. The only difference is the method of visualization/observation by the practitioner used during the surgical procedure. One side of the mouth will be treated with just loupes while the other side of the mouth will be treated with loupes and the videoscope.

All 16 chronic periodontitis (CP) subjects were clinically examined regarding the following clinical periodontal parameters: plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), bleeding index (BI), Pocket Probing Depth (PPD) and Relative Attachment Loss (RAL) which were recorded for all patients at baseline and 3 months after surgical periodontal treatment. Pre- surgical procedure: After the clinical parameters were recorded, Phase I therapy (full mouth scaling, root planning and oral hygiene instructions) was carried out. The patients were then put under observation to assess the oral hygiene practice and the response of the gingival tissue to Phase I therapy. After two weeks, patients were recalled and based on further treatment protocol, periodontal flap surgery was planned. Group A (Test Group) underwent periodontal flap surgery during which placental extract was applied. Group B (Control Group) underwent periodontal flap surgery alone. Surgical procedure The operative sites were anaesthetized with 2% lignocaine hydrochloride with adrenaline (1:180000). Crevicular incisions were made using Bard Parker No.15 blade on the facial and lingual/palatal surface of each tooth segment or area involved. A full thickness mucoperiosteal flap was reflected using periosteal elevator taking care to preserve the maximum amount of tissue in the flap. After exposure the granulation tissue was removed, the root surfaces were planed and the flap was trimmed of tissue tags to facilitate healing. The flap was approximated using interrupted sutures (mersilk 3-0) and a periodontal dressing was placed above it. Local delivery of the placental extract In group A patients (test group) after open flap debridement 1ml of human placental extracts gel (Placentrex - the original research product of Albert David Limited, India, a drug obtained from fresh term healthy human placentae) was dispensed in a dappen dish. Gelatin foam (Abgel, Sri Gopal Krishna Labs, Pvt.Ltd. India) was cut into small beads of 1 sq.mm and allowed to soak in the placental gel for a few seconds. These gelatin beads soaked in gel are placed into the surgical site locally with the help of a graft carrier and condensed into the defect area. To prevent uncontrolled spill-over effects of the gel, mild pressure was applied over the flap with the wet gauze and excess gel was removed and Coe Pak was placed. While in group B(control group), after open flap debridement, this step is omitted. Post-operative care Antibiotics and analgesics are prescribed two times a day for five days. Patients were instructed to refrain from chewing hard or sticky foods, brushing near the treated areas or using any interdental aids for 1 week. The use of mouthwash was avoided during the observation period. All patients were placed on a strict maintenance schedule following surgery. The sutures were removed 10 days later. Recall appointments were scheduled once in 10 days for the 1st month. At every recall appointment, oral hygiene was checked. At 3rd month, the clinical parameters were recorded in both the groups. The difference between pre and post-operative values was assessed and then statistically analysed