Active clinical trials for "Arthritis"

Population Patients with a diagnosis of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), moderate or high clinical disease activity (CDAI>10) despite conventional synthetic (cs)DMARD(s) therapy for ≥3 months, naïve to biological (b) and targeted synthetic (ts)DMARDs therapy and a maximum of 2 swollen joints (out of 44 joints) Study design Randomised multicentre, parallel-arm clinical study Primary objective Non-inferiority of the experimental arm (i.e. clinical therapy together with ultrasound guided treatment decision) in comparison to the control arm (clinically guided decision) concerning the proportion of patients reaching low disease activity (CDAI ≤10) and a minimal clinical important improvement (MCII: improvement of ≥6 points if starting from moderate disease activity, any case starting from high disease activity and achieving low disease activity) or remission according to ACR/EULAR index-based remission criteria (CDAI ≤2.8/Boolean remission) at week 24. Intervention This is a randomised multicentre, national, parallel-arm clinical study. Patients with a diagnosis of RA, moderate or high clinical disease activity (CDAI>10) despite conventional synthetic (cs)DMARD(s) therapy for ≥3 months, naïve to biological (b) and targeted synthetic (ts)DMARDs therapy and a maximum of 2 swollen joints (out of 44 joints) will be included and randomized to one of the following two strategic arms: Clinical decision strategy: All patients receive a TNF-alpha blocker while continuing background csDMARD(s) therapy. If a CDAI ≤10 is not achieved after 12 weeks, patients are switched to a bDMARD or tsDMARD. The decision on which b/tsDMARD to use at week 12 is at the discretion of the investigator. Clinical plus ultrasound-based decision strategy. All patients in this group will be evaluated by ultrasound at 44 joints. In case of clinically-verified plus ultrasound verified inflammation, patients will receive a TNF-alpha blocker while continuing background csDMARD(s) therapy. If a CDAI ≤10 is not achieved after 12 weeks, patients are again evaluated by ultrasound at 44 joints. In case clinically-verified plus ultrasound-verified inflammation is present, patients are switched to a bDMARD or tsDMARD. The decision on which b/tsDMARD to use is at the discretion of the investigator. In case clinically-verified plus ultrasound-verified inflammation is absent, patients receive step-up pain therapy while background csDMARD(s) will be continued. Sample size 110 patients Time plan Total duration of the study: 42 months Active phase for each patient: 48 weeks (24 weeks for the interventional treatment strategy and 24 weeks for follow-up visit) Recruitment: 30 months

The primary aim of our present study is to evaluate the effect of a targeted, intensified, multidimensional intervention compared to conventional treatment of modifiable risk factors for CVD in patients with early RA. The primary endpoint, a composite of death from cardiovascular causes, non-fatal MI, non-fatal stroke and re-vascularisation, will be assessed after 5years' follow-up.

This investigator-initiated study will serve as a sub-study for the American College of Rheumatology-sponsored VERVE protocol currently funded by the NIH. This double-blinded multicenter randomized pragmatic trial is designed to determine whether Zostavax or Shingrix are safe and effective in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) currently using anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapies. Inclusion/exclusion criteria for this sub-study mirror that of the parent VERVE trial with the exception of abatacept therapy being allowed. Preliminary data from the VERVE parent protocol enrolling patients using anti-TNF therapy is encouraging in that few patients experienced adverse events (56 adverse events in 50 participants, out of 140 participants in total) and that 96.2% of these adverse events were considered either mild or moderate. Importantly, there have been no instances of vaccine dissemination or zoster events to date.

One of the greatest success stories in rheumatology - the achievement of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) remission - is tempered by the fact that individuals with RA are dramatically under evaluated and under treated to reduce the risk for heart attacks and strokes. This project will build the foundation for an intervention that will test the hypothesis that the patient-centered intervention tailored to patients with RA to improve hyperlipidemia screening and treatment, thereby decreasing the risk for heart attacks and strokes. The aims of this proposal are: Aim 1: To identify patient and physician barriers to lower the risk for heart attacks and strokes in patients with RA. Aim 2: To develop an intervention designed to optimize lipid screening and management in RA patients. This will consist of patient education and a decision support program to facilitate screening for hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol level) or initiation of medications to lower cholesterol (primary outcome) and self-efficacy (level of confidence in performing a task) in taking medications to lower cholesterol secondary outcome). Aim 3: To pilot test the efficacy and feasibility of intervention developed in Aim 2. The investigators will apply methods related to clinical trials to test the feasibility of the newly developed intervention.

MARCH is the first randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled evaluation of the efficacy and pathologic mechanism determined by synovial biopsy of 6 months of methotrexate (n=100) versus placebo (n=50) therapy for chronic chikungunya (CHIKV) arthritis in Colombia with the option for open-label use of the medication for up to one year for all participants. Our central hypothesis is that methotrexate will significantly decrease chronic CHIKV arthritis disease severity compared to placebo via suppression of leukocyte accumulation in synovial tissue and decreased expression of inflammatory cytokines from synovial macrophages and fibroblast-like synoviocytes (FLS).

Phase II, single-centre, open label, two parallel arm cohort randomised controlled trial (RCT) testing abatacept in a population of anti-CCP Ab positive individuals at moderate to high risk of developing IA according to a published risk score, already followed in the observational study 'CCP: Next Generation'

To evaluate the fusion status of the hindfoot bones after receiving the ViviGen graft, an FDA approved cellular bone matrix. This is used in a population indicated for hindfoot arthrodesis as an alternative to an autograft.

The goal of this randomized, controlled, monocentric, single-blind, 2-arm, feasibility clinical investigation is to evaluate the safety of MectaShield hydrogel coating and to capture its preliminary clinical performance in the prevention of early peri-prosthetic joint infection (PJI) in patients undergoing cementless revision hip arthroplasty. The main questions it aims to answer are: demonstrate that the hydrogel coating MectaShield does not interfere with primary stability; evaluate clinical and functional outcomes, the rate of PJI and possible adverse events. Participants will undergo cementless revision hip arthroplasty; during surgery MectaShield hydrogel coating is applied on orthopaedic implants' surfaces (femoral stem and, if revised, acetabular cup) as a protective barrier for the prevention of bacterial adhesion. Surgery and follow-up are completed as per local standard practice. Stability will be assessed radiologically, while functional outcomes and PJI will be monitored by HOOS-PS, ASESPIS scores and according to the consensus document presented by European Society of Radiology (ESRa), the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM), the European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS), and the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID). Researchers will compare the results of the treatment group with those from a control group receiving cementless revision hip arthroplasty without the application of MectaShiled hydrogel coating.

The factors contributing to the development of rheumatoid arthritis are multiple, with a role of the environment and a predisposing genetic background. Among the modifiable environmental factors :unbalanced diet, overweight, low physical activity, smoking, periodontal disease, stress have been identified as risk factors for developing RA. By causing low-grade inflammation and stimulation of the immune system (particularly through adipokines, citrullination phenomena and changes in the microbiota), these factors promote the onset of the disease and could also participate in the maintenance of inflammatory processes. Thus, obese subjects have more active RA, a lower therapeutic response, and weight loss is associated with lower disease activity ; sedentary lifestyle is associated with more active RA and increased physical activity has beneficial effects on RA; people who smoke respond less well to treatment; periodontal disease is associated with more active RA and their treatment is associated with a decrease in this activity. Finally, different methods having a beneficial impact on stress (mindfulness meditation, yoga, relaxation, etc.) have shown interesting results in patients with RA. It is important to note that all of these factors are also associated with an increased cardiovascular risk, the leading cause of death in RA. The combination of these factors probably has synergistic effects and it is therefore relevant to propose a correction of all these factors in the same program. We have developed a management program for environmental risk factors for RA based with experts including rheumatologists, nutritionists, smoking cessation specialists, periodontal disease specialists and stress specialists.

This is a Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) study. The purpose of this research study is to determine in RA flare, whether musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS) inflammatory scores and/or disease activity scores improve with Acthar treatment.