search

Active clinical trials for "Polyps"

Results 161-170 of 382

Compare Bleeding Risk Between Cold and Hot Snaring Polypectomy for Small Colorectal Polyp: a Randomized...

Colorectal Polyp

In this randomized control trial the investigators aim to compare the bleeding complication between cold snaring and hot snaring polypectomy with a large sample size.

Completed2 enrollment criteria

Right Colon Polyp Miss Rates of Water Exchange and Carbon Dioxide Insufflation Colonoscopy

Right Colon Adenoma Miss RateRight Colon Hyperplastic Polyp Miss Rate

This will be a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing CO2 insufflation and WE in terms of right colon combined adenoma miss rate (AMR) and hyperplastic polyp miss rate (HPMR) by tandem inspection. It will be a single-site study conducted in Taiwan.

Completed2 enrollment criteria

Prevention of Colorectal Cancer Through Multiomics Blood Testing

Colon CancerRectal Cancer9 more

The PREEMPT CRC study is a prospective multi-center observational study to validate a blood-based test for the early detection of colorectal cancer by collecting blood samples from average-risk participants who will undergo a routine screening colonoscopy.

Active10 enrollment criteria

Multicenter Evaluation of Right Colon Polyp Miss Rates Using Water Exchange Versus CO2 Insufflation...

Right Colon Adenoma Miss RateRight Colon Hyperplastic Polyp Miss Rate

A prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing water exchange (WE) colonoscopy and carbon dioxide (CO2) insufflation in terms of right colon combined adenoma miss rate (AMR) and hyperplastic polyp miss rate (HPMR) by tandem inspection.

Completed2 enrollment criteria

Hot Snare Versus Hot Snare Polypectomy With Saline Injection for Colorectal Polyps

Polyp of Large Intestine

The complete removal of colorectal polyp is required to prevent tumor recurrence and development of potential interval cancers. However, several studies have shown high incomplete resection rate in endoscopic removal of neoplastic colorectal polyps larger than 5 mm. The polypectomy techniques using hot snare are usually used for the removal of these polyps. However, the optimal technique for complete resection of these polyps is unknown. There are few data comparing hot snare polypectomy with hot snare polypectomy after saline injection for complete resection of colorectal polyps (5mm or larger). The aim of this study is to compare hot snare polypectomy with hot snare polypectomy after saline injection for removal of 5-10mm sized colorectal polyps.

Completed7 enrollment criteria

Biopsy Forceps Versus Cold Snare for the Resection of Small Colonic Polyps

Colonic Polyps

The purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare the incomplete resection rates for small colon polyps less than or equal to 6 mm in size using two conventional polypectomy tools, jumbo cold biopsy forceps and cold snare.

Completed7 enrollment criteria

Evaluation of an Endoscopic Suturing System for Tissue Apposition in Colonic Polypectomy

Polyps

The purpose of this study is to show that the surgical site in the bowel wall can be sewn closed in the colon or intestine, with a new sewing device after removal of a benign polyp according to standard of care.

Completed13 enrollment criteria

CRC Detection Reliable Assessment With Blood

Colorectal CancerAdenomas Colon15 more

The CRC DRAW study will assess the sensitivity and specificity of the blood-based, Next-Gen CRC Screening Test for the detection of CRC.

Active17 enrollment criteria

Complete Removal of Neoplastic Large Colorectal Polyps: a Prospective Randomized Comparison of Endoscopic...

Colorectal Polyps

Recently, it was reported that the incomplete resection rate of neoplastic large polyps after conventional polypectomy was markedly high in clinical practice. The incomplete resection rate of neoplastic large polyps after endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is not known. The aim of this study is to compare the incomplete resection rate of neoplastic large polyps after EMR or conventional polypectomy. The EMR technique is preferable to conventional polypectomy for the complete resection of the large polyps (>15 mm in diameter)

Completed1 enrollment criteria

The Hysteroscopic Morcellator (HM).

Large Intrauterine PolypsSmaller Type 0 and 1 Myomas1 more

Rationale: The hysteroscopic morcellator (HM) is a novel technique for removal of intrauterine polyps, myomas and placental tissue. It withholds some technical advantages over resectoscopy. Previous data suggest that it's a faster technique than the latter, and shows that it has a low complication rate. Objective: To compare the HM to bipolar resectoscopy for removal of: 1) large intrauterine polyps, 2) smaller type 0 and 1 myomas, 3) residual placental tissue, in terms of efficiency and complications. Study design: Single blind, randomized controlled multicenter trial. Study population: Women aged over 18 years old with: 1) large (≥ 1 cm) intrauterine polyps, 2) smaller (≤ 3 cm) type 0 or 1 myomas, 3) residual placental tissue, who are planned for hysteroscopic removal. Intervention: Patients are randomized between removal with the HM or the bipolar resectoscope. Main study parameters/endpoints: Installation and operating time. Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: Women who are referred to our polyclinic will be seen on a first visit, and, according to the standard work-up, an ultrasound will be performed when intrauterine pathology is suspected. To confirm the diagnosis a saline infusion sonography (SIS) and/or ambulant diagnostic hysteroscopy will be performed consequently. Once the diagnosis is confirmed and surgery is planned, women will be asked whether they want to take part in this study. At this moment, both techniques are used in our hospitals and the choice of treatment depends on the preference of the gynaecologist. All women will be treated with operative hysteroscopy in a daycare setting according to the standard of care, only now randomized between the two techniques. A standard postoperative visit with ultrasound examination and/or ambulant diagnostic hysteroscopy is scheduled 6 weeks later. Late postoperative complications and complaints are recorded. It is expected that the HM beholds some advantages over the bipolar resectoscope such as shorter operating time and less complications (e.g. risk of perforation, current and fluid related complications). Previous data do not demonstrate any additional risks related to the use of the HM. Moreover we will check whether the HM has a lower risk of intrauterine adhesion formation, as this might influence patient's fertility. After completion of the RCT, an observational study is planned considering pregnancies subsequent to the hysteroscopic procedure.

Completed9 enrollment criteria
1...161718...39

Need Help? Contact our team!


We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs