Active clinical trials for "Post-Dural Puncture Headache"

PDPH is a common problem after either intentional or unintentional Dural puncture. It is especially common in young female patients and in patients undergoing Lumbar Puncture using the typical kit containing large 20 gauge needles (1). Hypothesis is that Cosyntropin therapy is at least as effective as current conservative therapy (caffeine/fluid) and/or Epidural Blood Patch. Patients will be randomly assigned to undergo either: (1) EBP with IVF therapy or (2)Cosyntropin IV with IVF therapy. Endpoints will be a pain score that is given prior to the procedure, Emergency Department (ED) discharge pain score and post procedural day (PPD) day 1, day 3 and day 7 pain and functional levels. Patients in Cosyntropin arm of the study may request crossover to EBP at anytime after a 24 hour assessment period is completed per Standard of Care for treatment of PDPH, in order to ensure no undue distress is placed on the patient in order to complete this study. Current treatments consist primarily of non-invasive treatment with intravenous fluids and caffeine therapy and invasive treatment by Epidural Blood Patch. Efficacy of Caffeine 300mg IV bis in die (BID) x 1d doses is approximately 70% (2). However this therapy has been linked to post-treatment seizures. EBP was originally thought to be 90% effective with repeat treatment efficacy approaching >96%. However more recent studies by Taivainen et al (3) have shown only a 61% rate of permanent cure. Additionally, EBP are contraindicated in patients with signs of increased intra-cranial pressure (ICP), coagulation issues, signs/symptoms of Central Nervous System (CNS) /systemic infection or local infection at the site of the EBP, thus resulting in decreased utility. Complications are also quite serious ranging from meningitis, spinal hematoma, repeat dural puncture, localized infection and vagal response to the procedure. EBP are not typically performed until after conservative measures have failed which leads to further prolongation of the patients decreased functional status and pain. Additionally, the cost of both treatments is substantial considering prolonged ED visits for conservative treatments often followed by the time and expense of an EBP. The goal of this investigation is to aid in the confirmation of case reports advocating the economy, efficacy and safety of synthetic Adrenal CorticTropin Hormone (ACTH) as a treatment of PDPH (4,5,6,7,8,9).

The purpose of this trial is to study the efficacy and efficiency of sphenopalatine ganglion block for management of post dural puncture headache in obstetric patients

Objectives: To compare the safety and efficacy of oral theophylline versus oral sumatriptan in the treatment of post-dural puncture headache (PDPH). Background: PDPH is the most frequent complication of procedures associated with dural puncture for spinal anesthesia or following accidental dural puncture during epidural anesthesia. Since invasive treatments have known complications, pharmacologic management may be preferable. Patients and Methods: This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, phase four clinical trial; carried out on 60 patients presented with PDPH at our hospital. Patients were randomly allocated into two equal groups (30 patients each); group T, received oral theophylline, and group S, received oral sumatriptan.

The purpose of the study is to compare Sphenopalatine ganglion block (SPGB) and aminophylline in the efficacy and safety management of PDPH.

Fifty patients of both sex, aged 18-50 years and ASA I and II undergoing elective lower abdominal and pelvic surgery under spinal anesthesia were included in this randomized double-blind study. Patients were randomly divided into 2 groups 25 each; group (I) received intravenous hydrocortisone 100mg every 8 hours for 48 hours and group (II) received intravenous infusion of mannitol 20% 100ml over 30 minutes followed by 100ml every 12hours. Mean (+/- SD) of headache intensity at 0, 6, 12, 24 and 48 hours after beginning of treatment was assessed using visual analog scale.

This study aims to investigate the ability of SPGB in the management of PDPH. Transcranial Doppler is also used as an measure to assess the block success by detecting the variability in the cerebral hemodynamics before and after the block.

Caffeine will be studied against placebo in patients with positional headache after a lumbar puncture (aka "spinal headache").

During labor and delivery, pregnant women may choose to receive pain relief called epidural analgesia, which is the delivery of a numbing agent through the back and into a body space around the spinal column. This numbs the area of the stomach and the pelvis. Typically the numbing agent is lidocaine, which is a local anesthetic like your dentist uses. Some times the numbing agent is combined with another medication that causes drowsiness and relieves pain called a narcotic. One of the risks associated with having this kind of pain relief is unintentional puncture of a sheath of tissue that surrounds and protects the spinal cord when inserting the needle. This sheath is called the dura. This would cause the fluid surrounding the spinal cord to leak out and this would cause a headache. This headache is called a post-dural puncture headache [PDPH]. The headache can be mild or severe. Rarely, PDPH can be serious and cause bleeding or small clots in the brain and damage to nerves that come out of the brain. The purpose of this study is to test the use of a technique that uses a hollow cotton swab [no needles] to numb a nerve cell cluster that sits at the very back of the nasal cavity. The anatomical name for this nerve cell cluster is the sphenopalatine ganglion. This has been done before at BJH and other hospitals with positive results, but no formal studies have been conducted here. Also, the sphenopalatine ganglion [SPG] has been the treatment target for other kinds of headaches. To numb the SPG, a hollow tip cotton swab [like a long Q-Tip] is inserted through the nose to the back of the nasal cavity and a solution of numbing agent is slowly pumped through the hollow Q-tip. This study will include a group that will receive a salt solution through the swab instead of a numbing agent. Subjects will be offered BJH standard care for their headache if they do not have relief from the study procedures. Standard care would be decided by their treating physician and may include oral pain medications and/or medications like ibuprofen [Motrin] or they could have a procedure called an epidural blood patch. This is performed by injecting a small amount of the patient's own blood into the areas of the spinal column where the original epidural anesthesia was injected in order to "patch" the leaks in the dura.

The objectives of this study are to investigate the effects of needle design, needle size and stylet reinsertion on the risk for headache after diagnostic LP (lumbar puncture, Post-LP headache). The following needles are used in the study: Sprotte 25 Gauge (G) (0.5 mm) atraumatic needle with introducer Sprotte 22 G (0.7 mm) atraumatic needle with introducer Spinocan 25 G (0.5 mm) cutting needle

The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of 19g versus =>18g traditional Tuohy-type epidural needles on the incidence and severity of postdural puncture headache (PDPH).