Active clinical trials for "Pulmonary Atelectasis"

In this study researchers aim to evaluate effect of different ventilation modalities on the developments of atelectasis by using ultrasound.

This study evaluates the incidence of postoperative atelectasis after general anesthesia with prone position using lung ultrasound in children age < 3 years.

General anaesthesia is known to promote lung collapse (atelectasis) which will persist in the postoperative period. Inflating the lung to a pressure of 40 cmH2O, called a vital capacity manoeuvre (VCM), performed a few minutes before extubation followed by the use of 40% of O2 will prevent postoperative atelectasis formation. This is not the case if VCM is followed by application of 100% of O2. However the use of 100% of O2 before tracheal extubation is still recommended for safety reason. Application of PEEP associated with pressure controlled ventilation before intubation prevents atelectasis formation despite the use of 100% of O2. The goal of our study was to show that performing a VCM 15 minutes before arousal followed by application of PEEP and pressure support ventilation (PSV) before and after tracheal extubation will prevent the recurrence of atelectasis despite the use of 100% of O2. Materials and Methods With the ethic committee for research on human beings approval, the investigators randomly assigned 16 non-obese patients scheduled for a gynaecological laparoscopic surgery in two groups. At the end of the surgery the investigators performed a VCM (40cmH2O applied for 12 seconds), then O2 was increased to 100% in both groups. In the patients of the study group, a PEEP of 6 cmH2O was applied associated with a PSV of 8 cmH2O. This was continued after the extubation for 3 minutes. The O2 was then decreased to 40% and, when the expired oxygen saturation was < 50%, PEEP and PSV were removed. For the patients in the control group, no positive pressure was applied during spontaneous ventilation (PEEP = 0 and no PSV). The atelectasis were then measured by computed tomographic scanning.

The investigators hypothesize that the level of PEEP is often suboptimally applied in certain operative conditions, such as in laparoscopy with head down (Trendelenburg) positioning. This can result in excessive levels of lung stress and postoperative pulmonary complications. In patients with steep Trendelenburg and a pneumoperitoneum, the investigators aim to measure apical versus basal atelectasis using the lung ultrasound score compare lung ultrasound scores at different PEEP levels compare respiratory mechanics at the different PEEP levels contrast the optimal PEEP level to standard practice provide guidance to optimal PEEP titration in this setting for the clinician

Postoperative pulmonary dysfunction (PPD) is a widely reported complication of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) although there is improvement in perioperative management, that leads to increased morbidity and mortality in cardiac surgery. Many surgical-related factors can predispose to postoperative pulmonary complications such as the effects of general anesthesia combined with the effects of a median sternotomy, CPB, and the use of topical cooling for myocardial protection. Main clinical manifestations of PPD include atelectasis, pleural effusion, and postoperative hypoxemia without clinical symptoms in addition to acute respiratory distress syndrome which is rare to happen but leads to high mortality Different strategies including perioperative management of mechanical ventilation (MV), restrictive transfusion, technical modifications of CPB, and medication administration such as steroids and aprotinin have been developed to lessen impairment of pulmonary function. A recent meta-analysis identified improvement in oxygenation after weaning from CPB when low tidal volume (LTV) ventilation was maintained or after lung recruitment maneuvers (LRM), as compared to when there was no ventilation (noV). Also, maintaining mechanical ventilation may reduce the inflammation response and tissue damage. So far, available researches regarding whether ventilation during CPB could improve respiratory outcomes is still controversial especially in pediatric patients undergoing corrective surgeries for congenital heart defects.

Postoperative pulmonary complication represent asignificant source of morbidity and have greater incidence and costs than cardiac complications alone .Atelectasis is the commonest one. Aelectasis may develop in nearly up to 90% of patients after general anaesthesia ,persist up to several days .Oxygen therapy is usually given in the postoperative period to alleviate hypoxemia. However it's usually discontinued before discharge to the ward based on clinical criteria such as patients being awake with normal vital signs and no respiratory distress. Available literatures suggest that it's not valid . Pulse oximetry provide accurate objective measurement of oxygenation,continuous and non invasive.Recently, Fernando etal 2017,used pulse oximetry after 5 minutes of oxygenation to detect postoperative atelectasis, the cut point was 96%.

Laparoscopic surgeries may cause atelectasis on the lungs which may stay clinically occult after the surgery. Lung Ultrasound Scoring (LUS) can provide an objective measuring system to understand the condition of the lungs in the perioperative period. In this randomized controlled study, it is aimed to investigate the effects of one single recruitment maneuver (RM) just before emergence and extubation (at the end of surgery) on LUS scores and postoperative recovery room oxygenation in laparoscopic nephrectomy surgeries. Accordingly, the intervention group will be applied single RM before extubation, while the control group will be awaken without RM. There will be LUS evaluation at 4 different time for intervention group (Group RM) points that are: T1: 5 min after the intubation T2: At the end of surgery (After skin closure, before recruitment maneuver) T3(RM): After recruitment maneuver, before extubation T4: 30 minutes after extubation in the recovery room LUS evaluation will be made at 3 different time points in control group (Group NoRM): T1: 5 min after the intubation T3(NoRM): Before extubation (no recruitment maneuvers will be made) T4: 30 minutes after extubation in the recovery room. The primary outcome is the comparison of the T3 LUS scores. Assuming a 40% difference in the T3 LUS score, total number of 30 patients were calculated to be included in the study with an alpha value of 0.05 and 95% power. A possible drop-out of 5 patients per group, 20 patients were planned to be enrolled in each group. Secondary outcomes will include; difference in T4 LUS scores, the effect of RM on postoperative recovery room oxygenation, and the effect of deltaLUS (T3-T2) on postoperative recovery room oxygenation.

This study aims to compared the effects of high flow nasal during the induction and during the weaning of anesthesia on intraoperative and postoperative oxygenation and postoperative atelectasis in obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery versus the standard of care, which consists in supplemental oxygen with face mask (Venturi mask).

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of adding a recruitment maneuver (RM) to low tidal volume (VT) ventilation, with or without an individualized post-RM positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) setting in lung-healthy patients during anesthesia.

Flexible bronchoscopes are typically reusable and therefore need high level disinfection to prevent inadvertent spread of microbial pathogens from patient to patient. The process of disinfection is time consuming and expensive. Moreover, a bronchoscope being processed may not be readily available for another patient. One solution to this problem was to use a single use disposable sheath that covers a flexible bronchoscope protecting all surfaces of the bronchoscope.(Colt, Beamis, Harrell, & Mathur, 2000). Another way to eliminate potential hazards with a reusable bronchoscope is the use of a disposable bronchoscope. Such a disposable bronchoscope has been developed (Ambu aScope, Ambu, Glen Burnie, MD) and has been used successfully for intubations in manikins(Scutt et al., 2011) and patients. (Kristensen & Fredensborg, 2013; Pujol, López, & Valero, 2010; Tvede, Kristensen, & Nyhus-Andreasen, 2012). Further advancement in the imaging and handling of this disposable flexible bronchoscope now allows for the purpose of bronchoscopy and broncho-alveolar lavage in critically ill patients with pulmonary compromise. (FDA approval: 05-11-2013 date) The aim of the study is to compare image clarity, suction capacity, and handling performance of a reusable flexible bronchoscope to the disposable flexible bronchoscope. In addition, the investigators intend to perform a cost analysis.