Active clinical trials for "Pseudophakia"

The aim of this study is to assess visual and refractive outcomes after Toric Trifocal lens implantation and visual outcomes after laser vision correction (LVC) - ReLex Smile to correct residual refraction after 6 months of Toric Trifocal (IOL) implantation.

Since intermediate vision is becoming increasingly important in our day-to-day tasks, a new IOL was introduced (Acunex Vario) with this objective in mind. This IOL provides excellent vision at far and intermediate distances up to 60 cm and with negligible photopic disturbances compared to conventional multifocal lenses. The Alcon AcrySof IQ Vivity IOL is designed to provide continuous vision from distance to intermediate while preserving contrast sensitivity and with a monofocal visual disturbance profile. So far, there are no published studies comparing these new IOL designs that offer an extended range of vision at far and intermediate distances. Objective: The primary objective of this study is to compare the binocular uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA) at 66 cm under photopic conditions 3 months postoperatively, in a series of patients bilaterally implanted with the Vario IOL versus those bilaterally implanted with the Vivity IOL. Study design: controlled double masked, randomized, prospective clinical trial Study population: patients of 18 years or older with bilateral cataracts that require cataract surgery. Intervention: One group receives bilateral implantation with the Vario IOL and the other group receives bilateral implantation with the Vivity IOL. Main study parameters: The main study parameter is the binocular UIVA at 66 cm under photopic conditions at 3 months postoperatively. Hypothesis: The investigators hypothesise that bilateral implantation with the Vario IOL is non-inferior when compared to bilateral implantation with the Vivity IOL, with regards to binocular UIVA at 66 cm under photopic conditions 3 months postoperatively. Cataract extraction in this study will proceed according to regular cataract surgery. As with any type of intraocular surgery, there is a possibility of complications due to anesthesia, drug reactions, and surgical problems. Postoperatively, there will be one extra postoperative visit, compared to standard cataract surgery follow-up. Spectacle-independency postoperatively, without photopic phenomena, is one of the major expected benefits when treating cataract (and presbyopia) with the implantation of the Vario or Vivity IOLs.

Purpose: To determine whether implantation of an intraocular lens (IOL) with a modified anterior aspheric surface results in reduced spherical aberration and improved contrast sensitivity after cataract surgery. Design: Prospective, comparative, interventional case series. Methods: In an intraindividual randomized prospective study of 25 patients with bilateral cataract, an IOL with a modified anterior surface (Tecnis Z9001, AMO- Group 1) was compared with biconvex lens with spherical surfaces (ClariFlex®, AMO- Group 2). Ocular aberrations for a 5.0 mm pupil and 6.0 mm pupil were measured with Hartmann-Shack aberrometer. Quality of vision was measured by visual acuity and contrast sensitivity under mesopic and photopic conditions. All patients were followed for 3 months.

The goal of this observational study is to learn about the Asqelio monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) model QLIO130C in patients undergoing cataract surgery. The aim of the study is to evaluate the lens implementation safety and efficacy after at least 24 months.

The purpose of this study is to document the safety and efficacy of primary IOL implantation in children below 2 years of age undergoing congenital cataract surgery.

Medicontur hydrophilic posterior chamber monofocal intraocular lens (IOLs) are indicated to improve vision at far distance in adults with cataract and/or ametropia (hyperopia, myopia), secondarily to removal of the crystalline lens. The intraocular lens is intended to be surgically implanted into the eye with the purpose of restoring optical function in the aphakic eye to provide an optical system with high predictability of the precalculated dioptric power. The study will be performed partially as a retrospective study with patients enrolled who had been implanted with 690AD or 690ADY IOLs mono- or binocularly between September 2021 - March 2022. Data from five visits will be collected: Baseline preoperative (maximum 90 days prior to surgery)- retrospective IOL implantation Day 0 - retrospective Postoperative visit at Day 1 (+/- 0 days) - retrospective Postoperative visit at 1 month (+/- 2 weeks) - retrospective Postoperative visit at 12 months (+/- 3 months) - consent and prospective visit

This is a single-center, randomized, investigator-masked, parallel group, and active-comparator controlled study investigating the clinical outcomes for visual acuity and macular thickness after treatment with Bromday (bromfenac ophthalmic solution) 0.09% QD or Nevanac (nepafenac ophthalmic suspension) 0.1% TID in subjects who have undergone cataract extraction with posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation.

Purpose:To compare visual performance, total and high order wavefront aberrations (coma, spherical aberration and other terms) and contrast sensitivity in eyes implanted with one monofocal aspheric intraocular lens (IOL) and two spherical IOLs (SofPort AO, Soflex,AcrySof®IQ (40 eyes), AcrySof®Natural and AMO®Sensar)

Purpose: To compare the posterior capsule opacification (PCO) inhibiting effect of the sharp posterior optic edge design of the Clariflex silicone intraocular lens (IOL) with that of the double-round edge design of the SI40 (Phacoflex) silicone IOL over a period of 3 years. Setting: Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. Methods: Fifty-two patients with bilateral age-related cataract (104 eyes) were included in this randomized, prospective, bilateral, patient- and examiner-masked clinical trial with intra-individual comparison. Each study patient had cataract surgery in both eyes and received an SI40 IOL (anterior and posterior round optic edges) in one eye and a Clariflex IOL with OptiEdge (round anterior and sharp posterior optic edge) in the other eye. Follow-up examinations were at one week, one month, six months, one, two, and three years. Digital retroillumination images were taken of each eye. The amount of PCO was assessed subjectively at the slit-lamp and objectively using automated image analysis software (AQUA) one, two, and three years after surgery.

Targeting of post-cataract refraction depends mainly on the prediction of the post-operative lens position, but also on the post-operative refraction itself. Hence, aim of this study is to evaluate the agreement and variability of subjective refraction performed by two independent examiners, autorefraction, and wavefront aberrometry in pseudophakic patients after uneventful cataract surgery.