Active clinical trials for "Rectal Diseases"

Anal fissure is a common anorectal diseases characterized by tear of the anoderm from the dentate line to the anal verge leading to pain and bleeding during and post defecation. It may be a benign disease, but patients suffering from disease report significantly impacted quality of life especially when it becomes chronic. Several treatment modalities have been studied for chronic anal fissure, and topical calcium channel blockers (CCB) showed promising benefit and side effect profile in treatment of chronic anal fissure. Topical Diltiazem and Nifedipine are currently widely used CCBs for chronic anal fissure after multiple studies showing their benefits compared to different agents or modalities. To the investigators' knowledge, there is no study comparing the efficacy of topical Diltiazem and Nifedipine directly. The investigators aim to design a pragmatic randomized clinical trial to compare the efficacy, and side effect profile of topical Nifedipine and Diltiazem in treatment of chronic anal fissure.

3D high resolution anorectal manometry (3DHRAM) is the most precise tool to assess function and 3D topographic picture of pressures along the anal canal. Until now, it has been used only in adult population to evaluate defecatory disorders. Congenital anorectal disorders are severe conditions and may present wide spectrum of symptoms from gastrointestinal tract. The usefulness of the 3DHRAM hasn't been evaluated in children after surgery for anorectal disorders such as Hirschsprung's disease and anorectal malformations. It may help for better understanding of pathophysiology of anorectal area and allow for planning improved procedures in these patients. Moreover, the investigators study may elucidate the real usefulness of the procedure in management of disorders of gastrointestinal tract in pediatric population.

Anorectal 3D high resolution manometry (3D HRM) is the most advanced version of manometry equipment and has been recently introduced into clinical practice. It is the most precise method to assess the anal sphincter pressure function and may be crucial for planning and controlling surgical procedures of the anorectal area. Normal values in pediatric population have not been established. The aim of this study is complex evaluation of anorectal function in children without symptoms from lower GI tract and establishment of normal values.

Ano-rectal manometry is indicative in patients with either fecal incontinence or constipation. Recently anorectal 3D- high resolution manometry has been developed. Pressure variations are measured circumferentially along the anal canal. It may allow a better understanding of anorectal disorders by displaying anal pressure asymmetry and it could be useful to assess the functional anatomy of the pelvic floor better than conventional manometry.

A randomized controlled multicenter trial on the usefulness of intraoperative angiography with indocyanine green to assess anastomosis perfusion in patients who undergo laparoscopic rectal resection or left colectomy.

In this study the investigators will include adult patients who are not part of a vulnerable patient population. Inclusion criteria include patients who will be undergoing resection of part of their colon that will require dividing the IMA. The investigators will use the resected surgical specimens for our project. The investigators will use the EnSeal on all major vessels in our procedure. The investigators will use the EnSeal 5 mm round head model. Due to the nature of the project, we will apply for IRB approval prior to beginning our research. The investigators plan to include 60 total patients in the study, 30 at the University of Illinois and 30 at Lutheran General Hospital. Prior to resection, the investigators will use a sterile caliper to take an in-vivo measurement of the IMA and IMV. Immediately after resection, the investigators will remove the sealed proximal end of the IMA and the 3 cm distal to it from the surgical specimen. The investigators will similarly prepare the IMV. The investigators will inspect our vessels for any iatrogenic traumatic tears. If the vessels are suitable, the investigators will then gentle apply manual traction to remove any blood or clots within the lumen. The investigators will measure the outer diameter of the vessels using a digital caliper. If there are small branches, the investigators will tie them off with suture. The unsealed end will then be attached to the burst pressure tester with suture and it will be tested for the bursting pressure. The device measures pressure continuously as it infuses the segment with normal saline at a steady rate (50 ml/hr). A leak will be determined by a decrease in intra-luminal pressure of 100 mm Hg or a visible leak. A failure to seal the vessels will be determined by a bursting pressure of less than 100 mm Hg. It should be noted that each section would only be pressure-tested once. All of our data will be collected on the enclosed data sheet we have created for use in this protocol. The investigators will then place the vessels with the original surgical specimen where it will be submitted for routine pathological examination of surgical specimens. Twenty five specimens at each site will undergo the testing, whereas 5 specimens will be sent to pathology without testing. Our pathologist will analyze the submitted specimen for extent of seal, disruption of vessel smooth muscle, gas bubbles, and will stain for elastin to analyze the disruption in the vessel wall. In addition, the seal will be measured and we will obtain digital images. The specimens submitted for pathology will be 5 burst specimens as well as 5 un-burst specimens taken from the pool of 25 patients at UIC. For our human component, the investigators have estimated the standard deviation and width of the confidence interval to be 100 mm Hg each. With a 95% confidence level, the investigators expect to require 16 measurements for human specimens from 16 patients although the investigators will use 50 patients to allow for errors in obtaining pressures. Our timeline for the completion of the projects is 6 months. The investigators plan on being able to complete the human burst pressure testing within 6 months.

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is known to cause urinary disorders, sexual and bowel dysfunction. Urinary symptoms due to MS are well known and profit of multiple questionnaire or tool developed in MS patients. Prevalence of bowel disorders in MS is difficult to assess. Some studies up to 70% bowel disorders in MS patients. Constipation and fecal incontinence are the two main symptoms in neurogenic bowel dysfunction and frequently coexist in this population, generally in association with urinary disorders. Because of the high prevalence of bowel disorders their and the major impact on the quality of life of patients with Multiple sclerosis (PwMS) , and the cross-talk bladder-rectum (persistence of anorectal dysfunction leading to poor neurogenic bladder control) assessment of bowel disorders in MS is necessary. But this evaluation is difficult as no specific score exist. The neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction score (NBD) is often used. The NBD was developed and validated for spinal cord injury (SCI) population but not for PwMS MS. Yet NBD is often used in research for all neurologic patients despite its lack of sensibility in various neurogenic population other than spinal cord injury patient. As recommended in a Cochrane revue in 2014, there is a need of a specific evaluation for bowel symptoms in neurogenic population, especially for PwMS. The aim of the study was to create and validate a new multidimensional questionnaire to assess bowel dysfunction and impact on quality of life in patients with MS. The investigators conducted a prospective multicenter study (8 centers) between June 2019 to April 2021. This study was developed in 3 steps. First step was literature review and qualitative interview. Then the second step was the feasibility study to evaluate comprehension, acceptability of the different items. The last part of the study was the validation study of the questionnaire. This part of the study was performed between June2020 and April 2021. Validation study allowed to determine the psychometric properties of the new tool. Patients aged over 18 years with multiple sclerosis diagnosed on the 2017 revised McDonald's criteria were included. Patients not able to read or understand the objectives and procedures for conducting the protocol and patient who had a recent relapse of MS were excluded.

Water injection colonoscopy has been a generally accepted method in training the beginners of colonoscopy for its low pain and less cecal intubation time, we would conduct this study to investigate more advantages of this method and make most use of it for beginners' training.

Multiple sclerosis causes demyelinating lesions, which can induce multiple symptoms. Ano-rectal avec urinary disorders are frequent due to specific lesions in inhibitor/activator encephalic centers, or interruption on medullary conduction. It seems to be evident that anorectal and urinary disorders are link, because of similar anatomic ways and control process. To our knowledge several studies test the effect of rectal distension and bladder sensory function but only one study examined the effect of bladder filling on rectal sensitivity on healthy people. The effect of bladder filling on rectal sensory function in patient with neurological disease stay unknown, while dysfunction often occur concomitant, and therapeutic actions in one organ may influence function of the other. Anorectal manometry is the gold standard for the evaluation of rectal sensory function and the volume of constant sensation to need to defecate is reported in literature as the most reproducible measure. Primary aim is to assess the effect of need to void on volume of constant sensation to need to defecate in multiple sclerosis with anorectal symptoms. Secondary aim is to identify the effect of need to void on modulation of rectoanal inhibitory reflex (RAIR) and external anal sphincter resting pressure. Patient with multiple sclerosis over 18 years old, consulting for anorectal disorders in a tertiary center, with an indication to realize an anorectal manometry are included. History and treatment, height, weight, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), anorectal and urinary symptoms severity by Bristol, Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction (NBD), Cleveland, Kess, Urinary Symptom Score (USP) scores, and last urodynamic data are recorded. Patient are asked to drink water until they feel a strong need to void, for which they would go to urinate at home. 3 void volume with portable sonography are done, and the higher is recorded. Anorectal manometries are realized by the same doctor, in a specific place, with calm. Before the manometric examination, thermal and vibratory sensory thresholds on the right hand are collected. The patient is then placed in a left lateral position. Then the anorectal manometry's catheter is inserted and collect of the external anal sphincter resting pressure begins. Then the investigator proceed to search for RAIR by 5 brief distensions of the intrarectal balloon with increasing volumes of 10 mL from 10 mL to 50 mL. Finally, the investigator collect the threshold volumes of perception, need and maximum tolerable by gradually distending the intra-rectal balloon to 5 mL/s from 0 mL to 300 mL. Toilets are just next to the table of examination. Next, patient can urinate. 3 post void residual volume with portable sonography are done, and the higher is recorded. The same tests are realized after urinate, in the same order. After the classical complete manometry was performed. Primary outcome is the volume of constant sensation to need to defecate Secondary outcomes are the modulation of RAIR and the external anal sphincter resting pressure. Manometric data are collected. Influence of age, EDSS, severity of symptoms, manometric data and detrusor overactivity on rectal sensory function will be study in secondary analysis.

Anorectal surgery includes pilonidal sinus, hemorrhoidectomy, anal fissure, and anal fistula operations. General and spinal anesthesia were common anesthetic methods in anorectal surgery. We designed this study to test the hypothesis that general anesthesia was superior than spinal anesthesia with respect to urine retention rate, pain score, recovery time, and side effects.