Active clinical trials for "Rectal Neoplasms"

To increase the efficacy of neoadjuvant PD-1/PD-1 checkpoint inhibitor in local advanced rectal cancer (LARC), we propose preoperative arterial infusion of Tirellizumab and oxaliplatin followed by tumor artery embolization with concurrent chemoradiotherapy as neoadjuvant regimen for LARC.

In the present project, the investigators plan to more accurately select the rectal cancer patients with pathological complete response (pCR) to preoperative concomitant chemoradiation therapy (CCRT), taking advantage of quantification of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in addition to the current available diagnostic modalities, including CT, MRI, PET and colonoscopy. The patients with suspected pCR to CCRT will be randomized to radical surgery and local excision groups, followed by the comparison of the oncologic outcomes between two treatment methods. The investigators hypothesized that if the pCR for patients with rectal cancer after CCRT can be more accurately predicted, such patients can be safely treated with limited surgery to enhance the post-treatment life quality, in comparison with patients undergoing radical surgery.

In this study, patients with resectable rectal cancer will receive radiotherapy, followed by neoadjuvant bevacizumab and atezolizumab

The purpose of this study is to first determine the maximum tolerated dose of capecitabine given alone or in combination with valproic acid during preoperative short-course radiotherapy (Phase 1). The next part of the study (Phase 2)will explore whether the addition of valproic acid or the addition of capecitabine to short-course radiotherapy, before optimal radical surgery might increase the pathologic complete tumor regression rate in patients with low-moderate risk rectal cancer.

This is a single arm phase II study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by local excision and post-operative chemoradiotherapy in patients with early stage, low rectal adenocarcinoma. After completion of pre-treatment tests/procedures (including pelvic MRI/ERUS; MRI is mandatory at baseline and other imaging is encouraged) and confirmation of eligibility, systemic therapy with FOLFOX will be administered for 12 weeks. 2 to 4 weeks after the chemotherapy, restaging of the primary tumor will be done to evaluate response to therapy (Pelvic MRI and /or sigmoidoscopy). Patients with disease progression or inadequate response to chemotherapy to allow local excision will continue with evaluation and treatment per the current standard of care (chemoradiation followed by TME). These patients will be considered failures for the primary endpoint of the study. Patients who respond to the neoadjuvant chemotherapy will proceed with local excision (open, TEMS or TAMIS), 6-12 weeks after the completion of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, followed by 5-FU based chemoradiotherapy 4-12 weeks after local excision. Patients with positive margins at the time of local excision will also be treated as per standard of care and will be considered as failures. Number of patients who can undergo successful local excision with this approach will define the success of the strategy. After chemoradiation therapy post local excision, patients will be followed closely every 3 months for the first 3 years and then every 2 months for the next 2 years (history/physical, CEA and pelvic MRI). Patients who are deemed failures for the primary end-point will be followed as per standard of care, off-study.

Laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer has been successfully proven to be a non-inferior alternative regarding resection quality, and oncological outcomes of patients as compared to open surgery in mangy clinical trails. Moreover, laparoscopic surgery is advantageous over open surgery with regard to operative invasiveness, patient's recovery, and wound related complications. Thus, laparoscopic surgery has gained great popularity over the past decades. However, specifically for mid and low rectal cancer, laparoscopic surgery is technically demanding, which sometimes leads to high morbidity and unsatisfactory resection quality, especially in challenging cases such as bulky mesorectum, enlarged prostate, irradiated pelvis, etc. Under this circumstance, transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) , the so called "down-to-up" alternative, has emerged as a promising solution to these problems in recent years and more and more small studies have proven the feasibility and advantages of this technique, making it become a hot topic among both literature and conferences. However, TaTME is still at early birth, higher-level evidences, either multicentric, or comparative study with conventional surgery is strikingly lacking. Thus the investigators conduct this multicentre randomised clinical trial, comparing transanal TME versus laparoscopic TME for mid and low rectal cancer, aiming to prove the hypothesis that TaTME may achieve better resection quality and result in non-inferior oncological outcome, as well as short term operative morbidity and mortality.

Treatment for Low rectal cancer, especially in patients with regional lymph node metastasis are quite different between Japanese guideline (JSCCR) and western countries' guideline (NCCN, ESMO). While Japanese scholars advocate total mesorectal excision (TME) plus lateral lymph node dissection (LLND), European and American scholars advocate TME alone after Neoadjuvant Chemo-radiotherapy (nCRT), without the need of LLND. Accordingly, this clinical trial is designed to directly compare the efficacy and safety of these two treatment strategies for low rectal cancer with regional lymph node metastasis. It will provide high-level clinical evidence for the treatment of low rectal cancer with suspected local lymph node metastasis

The aim of this study is to determine whether greater rectal cancer downstaging and regression occurs when surgery is delayed to 12 weeks after completion of radiotherapy/chemotherapy compared to 8 weeks. Hypothesis: Greater down-staging and tumor regression is observed when surgery is delayed to 12 weeks after completion of chemoradiotherapy compared to 8 weeks.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with clinical stage III rectal cancer who received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy on the basis of postoperative pathological stage.

Rectal cancer represents the most complex area of multidisciplinary treatment in bowel surgery. In 2017, there were 1221 new rectal cancers in Finland. The prognosis of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients these days is almost exclusively driven by the occurrence of the metastatic form of the disease. The treatment of rectal cancer often includes a long delay between diagnosis and the initiation of systemic chemotherapy, increasing risk for systemic metastases for those at high risk. On the other hand, the waiting time during pretreatment before surgery enables comprehensive systematic characterization of the primary tumor status before the decisions on adjuvant chemotherapy, opening a window to the use of precision in decision-making. In this randomized controlled treatment trial, outcomes of novel precision methods to select right rectal cancer patients for treatment that they need will be compared to conventional treatment. The study aims to reduce over-treatment of those that most likely do not benefit from additional treatments. With the overall aim to reduce metastatic form of the disease, patients with high-risk features will be randomized to a treatment strategy with early systemic control by chemotherapy followed by circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and organoid-guided adjuvant therapy, or to conventional treatment strategy. Both state-of-the-art laboratory practice and routine diagnostic clinical pipelines are introduced to bring future diagnostic models of minimal residual disease and chemoresistance closer to current practice. The outcomes will reveal the clinical benefit of such strategy by recurrence-free survival at highest level of evidence, and produce important clinical outcome data on the application of ctDNA in everyday cancer treatment practice. The translational data on the use of ctDNA organoids to inform treatment decision and regimen selection will build knowledge of the use of such biomarkers as tools for clinical practice and clinical research. The results will be scalable worldwide in the practice of rectal cancer treatment.