Active clinical trials for "Kidney Calculi"

This is a prospective randomized trial to study the effect of assigning the control of the fluoroscopic x-ray activation to the surgeon as compared to the radiation technologist. Radiation exposure will be assessed from the collected data, fluoroscopy time, and dose parameters (cumulative absorbed dose and dose area product). From exposure data, entrance skin dose (ESD) and midline absorbed dose (MLD) will be calculated. The primary outcome in this study will be total fluoroscopy time for the procedure. A secondary outcome will be the ESD. The investigators will further analyze the contribution of clinical predictors (e.g. stone size/location) and procedural predictors on fluoroscopy times and ESD. It is hypothesized that a 30% reduction in fluoroscopy time will occur when the operating surgeon is controlling the activation of the x-ray beam.

Ultraslow full-power SWL versus slow power-ramping SWL in stones with high attenuation value

A double blind randomized controlled trial designed to compare pain control and safety with ketorolac and oxycodone in the post-operative setting for patients undergoing ureteroscopy for treatment of urinary stones. Patients are followed for five days after their surgery as they record their pain scores, medication utilization, and stent related symptoms.

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is a minimally- invasive procedure for removing kidney stones. The small incision of PCNL is performed medially from the posterior axillary line according to stones location. Despite the small skin incision patients suffer from postoperative pain due to visceral pain and intercostal nerve injury. The aim of this study is to evaluate the perioperative analgesic effect of subcostal transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block performed prior to PCNL procedure. Primary outcome of our study was Morphine consumption at 48th hour after the surgery. Secondary outcomes were perioperative fentanyl consumption; postoperative Verbal Analog Scale and additional analgesic drug requirement.

Due to the anatomic characteristics of the lower calyx, lower pole stones are difficult to be eliminated through the ureter, even if the stones had been fragmented. Retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) can be used to deal with lower pole stones of 1.0-2.0 cm, while percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (PCNL) is mainly used to deal with lower pole stones with larger diameter or when RIRS failed to resolve the stone. This study was conducted to compare mini PCNL and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for the management of lower pole kidney stones in terms of efficacy.

there is an increased incidence of renal stones, especially in the pediatric age group. the percutaneous approach in the pediatric age took a long time till it again accepted among surgeons worldwide. the prone position is the preferred approach to perform percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the pediatric age group. this study aims to compare supine versus prone position percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the pediatric age group.

A prospective, single-center, single-arm, trial to demonstrate safety and device performance of the ADVA-Tec Uriprene™ Degradable Temporary Ureteral Stent. This is a first-in-man clinical study in a small human population.

Outpatient tubeless Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) could potentially improve patient care and result in significant cost savings for our hospital each year. If this pilot study is successful, Queen's/KGH will lead a collaborative national multicentre trial to further establish the role of this new approach in the surgical treatment of kidney stones.

The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy of febuxostat, once daily (QD), compared to allopurinol or placebo in patients with excessive amounts of uric acid in their urine and who have recently had kidney stones.

The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy of the α-adrenergic antagonist tamsulosin in the treatment of adult emergency department (ED) patients with ureteral colic secondary to lower ureteral calculus. We hypothesize that there will be no difference in outcomes for subjects treated with and without tamsulosin.