Active clinical trials for "Acidosis, Respiratory"

This study will evaluate the ability of High Velocity Nasal Insufflation [HVNI] to effect ventilation and related physiologic responses in hypercapnic patients when compared to noninvasive positive pressure ventilation [NIPPV].

A reduction of peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) commonly occurs during bronchoscopy and may be associated with both respiratory and cardiac adverse events. The type of breathing assistance that should be delivered to patients, in order to treat and/or to prevent acute respiratory failure, during or after bronchoscopy, is not universally standardized; studies comparing the impact of different respiratory supports on patient's outcome and on hospital resource use are very few. the risk of respiratory failure rises according to the type of procedure (i.e., increased risk with broncho-alveolar lavage and trans-bronchial lung biopsy) and to the use of sedative drugs. Conventional oxygen therapy with nasal cannula, continuous positive airway pressure and non-invasive ventilation are commonly applied during endoscopic procedures. High flow oxygen therapy (HFOT) is a relatively novel device, still under-used in the context of interventional pulmonology, providing an humidified air-oxygen blend up to 60 L/min. HFOT has been reported to be effective for the treatment of both hypoxemic and hypercapnic respiratory failure. The investigators hypothesize that HFOT could be feasible and safe in patients undergoing bronchoscopy under moderate sedation, affected by or at risk of hypoxemic and/or hypercapnic respiratory failure.

The purpose of this pilot study is to evaluate whether administration of nitric oxide (NO)gas by oxygen hood at 20 ppm significantly increases PaO2, as compared to placebo gas (oxygen), within one hour of initiation and with no significant adverse effects.

VNI Versus is a clinical, prospective, randomized, cross over study, aiming to compare two mechanical ventilators during non-invasive ventilation for patient suffering from respiratory acidosis. This study will compare a dedicated ventilator for Non Invasive Ventilation (NIV) functioning with a turbine and with vented mask (exhalation by a calibrated leak) and a dedicated ventilator for Intensive Care Unit (ICU), functioning with non-vented masks and an exhalation valve. Patient will be randomized before the first NIV session lasting 2 hours. After a two hours wash-out, a second NIV treatment will be delivered with the other ventilator for duration of 2 hours. Arterial blood samples will be collected at the beginning and the end of each session of NIV. A transcutaneous captor of dioxide carbon pressure (PCO2) will also be used for patient monitoring.

A feasibility study to inform the design and conduct of a randomised controlled trial of high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) versus continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for non-invasive respiratory support in critically ill children

Hypothesis: Extracorporeal removal of CO2 can treat hypercapnia and respiratory acidosis, which allows application of lung protective ventilation. This downgrading of mechanical ventilation promotes better and more quickly lung recovery. Aim: The aim of the study is to treat respiratory acidosis and to reduce plateau pressures by using an extracorporeal removal of CO2 (ECCO2-R). This prospective study will include 10 patients with an Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS). ARDS is an inflammatory response in the lungs, the onset is acute with pulmonary oedema and shows bilateral densities on chest radiography. The take up of oxygen and the loss of CO2 in the lungs are difficult. Moreover the patient's blood can become acidic due to too much CO2. To promote a better gas-exchange, the patient with ARDS will be mechanically ventilated. This can be aggressive and harmful for the lungs. With the use of an extra-corporeal CO2-remover, CO2 can be removed so that the mechanical ventilation setting will be less aggressive and will decrease lesions in the lung. The veno-venous extracorporeal CO2-remover pumps blood from a vein via a catheter through an oxygenator (gas exchanger that adds oxygen to the blood and extracts carbon dioxide from the blood) and back into a vein. The investigators will use a standard dialysis catheter that will be put in a large vein. To prevent clotting of the system, the patient will receive heparin. In the study the investigators will work in periods of two hours, the situation before and after carbon dioxide removal will be compared. With this study the investigators want to prove that the CO2 in the blood decreases with at least 20 % with the use of the extracorporeal CO2 remover. More over the investigators want to prove that lower mechanical ventilation settings (thanks to CO2-removal by the ECCO2-R) will produce fewer lesions to the lungs.

This prospective study includes 5 patients with ARDS (Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome) treated by mechanical ventilation. In case of respiratory acidosis, extracorporeal CO2 (carbon dioxide)removal might be necessary. We hereby work with the Abylcap system with the oxygenator Lilliput2 as CO2 remover (Bellco, Italy). The patients (M/V) are older than 18, not pregnant, have a BMI<30, and no contraindication for anticoagulation therapy. Under standard conditions patients are treated with a blood flow of QB=300mL/min and a gas flow (100% 02) of QG=7L/min. Blood sampling is performed from the arterial bloodline in the patients at 0, 1h, 3h, 24h, 48h, 72h, 96h, and 120h. A parameter study is also performed to optimise CO2 removal. Herewith, blood samples (1mL) are taken from the inlet and outlet line of the Lilliput2 at the previously mentioned time points and for different flow setting: Blood flow (QB) 200-300-400mL/min and gas flow (QG) 1.5, 3, 6, 7, 8L/min Blood samples are analysed for the different blood gases from which the extraction in the CO2 remover can be calculated for each setting of QB (blood flow) and QG (gas flow).

This study compares a volume targeted pressure support non-invasive ventilation with an automatic PEP regulation (AVAPS-AE mode) to a pressure support non-invasive ventilation (S/T mode) in patients with acute hypercapnic respiratory failure with acidosis. This study focuses on patients at risk of obstructive apneas or obesity-hypoventilation syndrom (BMI≥30 kg/m²). Half of participants (33 patients) will receive non invasive ventilation with AVAPS-AE mode, the other half will receive non-invasive ventilation with S/T mode.

Alterations of acid-base equilibrium are very common in critically ill patients and understanding their pathophysiology can be important to improve clinical treatment. The human organism is protected against acid-base disorders by several compensatory mechanisms that minimize pH variations in case of blood variations in carbon dioxide content. The aim of the present study is to quantify the buffer power, i.e. the capacity to limit pH variations in response to carbon dioxide changes, in critically ill septic patients and compare these results with data collected from healthy volunteers.

Alterations of acid-base equilibrium are very common in critically ill patients and understanding their pathophysiology can be important to improve clinical treatment.