Active clinical trials for "Fibromyalgia"

The main objective is to assess the efficacy of Acceptance & Commitment Therapy (ACT) in group for the treatment of fibromyalgia. The secondary aims are: 1.- To assess the cost-effectiveness of ACT and 2.- To assess the efficacy of ACT in other variables such as anxiety, depression, pain or global function. 3.- To evaluate the usefulness or electroencephalographic cordance as a prognostic variable of the treatment. HYPOTHESIS: ACT in group is effective for improvement of pain acceptance and other outcome variables (pain, anxiety, depression, global function) in fibromyalgia, and it is cost-effective. Cordance is an useful predictor of treatment efficacy in these patients. DESIGN: Multicentre, randomized, controlled study, with parallel groups, and a 6-month follow-up period. Participants will be randomly allocated to one of two conditions: 1.- Group Acceptation & Commitment Therapy or 2.- Treatment as usual by his general practitioner. Patients diagnosed of fibromyalgia, according to the American College of Rheumatology, will be recruited in primary care. Assuming an alpha=0.05 and p=80%, using two tails, and calculating 5% of refusals, it will be necessary a sample size of 55 patients for each group of patients.

Fibromyalgia affects 0.7 to 3.3% of the adult population and 7-10 times more women than men. In France, the prevalence is 1.6% according to a French study conducted in 2009 and published in 2011 by Serge Perrot et al. The definition of fibromyalgia was recently amended with particular consideration of cognitive and somatic symptoms, factors not involved in the initial criteria of the ACR classification. Several factors are in favor of a malfunction of the central modulation of pain and poorer performance noxious inhibitory controls descendants (DNIC: diffuse noxious inhibitory controls) have been demonstrated. In fibromyalgia patients, the DNIC (diffuse noxious inhibitory controls) are altered with less pain inhibition than controls. Dysfunction of the central pain modulation is widely described in the literature and contributes to pain complained of fibromyalgia. According to the Recommendations of the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) 2006, antidepressants have a genuine analgesic efficacy in controlled studies. Milnacipran is an antidepressant known and used in major depressive disorder according to its marketing authorization but is also part of the molecules used in the treatment of chronic neuropathic pain and fibromyalgia according to the recommendations of the EULAR. A review included five double-blind studies on 4,000 participants who took 100 mg or 200 mg milnacipran or placebo over a period of 8 weeks to 24 weeks. A moderate response was obtained for 40% of participants treated for each dose of milnacipran on the criteria of "at least 30% pain relief" Impression and global change. Substantial improvement with milnacipran compared to placebo has been shown. To date, the link between the weakening of DNIC in fibromyalgia and effectiveness of drug treatment has not been shown. This study aims to assess the degree of impairment of DNIC in fibromyalgia patients may be predictive of the efficacy of milnacipran.

The study's primary objective is to evaluate the effect of intravenous lidocaine on pain and plasma interleukin-1 (IL-1), interleukin-6 (IL-6) and substance P in patients with fibromyalgia. As secondary objectives: evaluate the clinical manifestations, and plasma concentration of lidocaine.

Chronic pain affects more than 50 million adults in the United States and is estimated to cost the nation more than $560 billion dollars each year. Regular physical activity is widely recognized as essential for maintaining health for all individuals, but is particularly important for individuals with chronic pain (ICPs) as physical activity can prevent further deconditioning and may even improve pain outcomes. Previous literature has shown that certain categories of partner behaviors (e.g., solicitous, punishing, distracting) are associated with different health outcomes for ICPs, and recently researchers have begun examining partner behaviors through the lens of Self-Determination Theory, specifically looking at the effects of autonomy support from a spouse on physical activity among ICPs. Partner autonomy support has been positively associated with physical activity levels and better health outcomes, but no studies to date have explored what factors predict whether or not a partner will use an autonomy supportive interpersonal style (as opposed to a controlling interpersonal style) with the ICP. Similarly, more research is needed on the mechanisms by which autonomy support promotes positive outcomes for ICPs. Though receiving autonomy support has been linked to increased physical activity and improved mental health, no studies have yet tested the full Self-Determination Theory model as one possible explanation of the link between this form of partner support and desirable health outcomes. In particular, it is important to understand the ICP's perspective on how partner autonomy support influences need satisfaction and autonomous motivation as possible mediators between autonomy support and ICP physical activity. Furthermore, little research has explored other need supportive behaviors or their need frustrating counterparts. The current study will not only provide greater understanding of autonomy support, but will also expand the literature regarding these other need supportive and need thwarting behaviors. Lastly, given the value of need supportive behaviors from one's partner, it is essential to evaluate how partner perceptions of those need supportive behaviors align with ICP's perceptions of those behaviors. Any need support a partner provides is likely moderated by the ICP's perception of that support.

This study aims to map the impact of anodic transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for prolonged home use applied to the primary motor cortex and the left dorsolateral prefrontal córtex (DLPFC), compared to the respective treatments simulated in fibromyalgia.

This study aims to understand the efficacy of two probiotic interventions as prophylaxes of fibromyalgia symptoms in individuals diagnosed. The primary outcome measure will be the progression and treatment of fibromyalgia, defined as a decrease in the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) score, other otucomes will be the effect on the symptoms of anxiety and depression associated with fibromyalgia, defined as a decrease in the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HAD) score; perception of pain by scoring on a Visual Analogical Pain Scale (VAS), and differences in the patient's usual medical treatment. Finally adverse effects will be evaluated. The study will have two arms: one arm including a probiotic preparation and a placebo arm.

The main objective of this study is to analyse the effectiveness of the VIRTUAL FIBROWALK multicomponent treatment program as coadjuvant of treatment-as-usual (TAU) compared to TAU alone. In this Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT), in addition to evaluating the clinical effects of VIRTUAL FIBROWALK treatment in the short- and longterm.

Rationale: Low back pain (LBP), or myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) of the low back, accounts for approximately 2.63 million visits in the United States, or 2.3 percent of annual Emergency Department (ED) visits. An estimated 100 billion dollars per year is lost from LBP. Approximately one-third of this is direct costs. Previous studies have established the safety of trigger point injections (TPI). However, the results of these studies are highly heterogeneous regarding TPI's ability to treat pain or improve functional outcomes. The two most promising TPI studies conducted in the ED have been published in the last two years. They both suffered from a small sample size. Additionally, they suffered from a combination of limitations including: lack of randomization, inconsistent medical management, lack of a follow-up assessment, and lack of patient centered functional outcomes. These studies were both two armed and either compared standard medical management to TPI with local anesthetic or TPI with local anesthetic to TPI with Normal Saline (NS). One of these studies concluded that TPI is generally beneficial. The other concluded that TPI with NS is superior. Research Hypothesis: The investigators hypothesize that standard therapy (ST) plus TPI with 8 mL of 0.5 percent Bupivacaine is superior to ST alone or ST plus TPI with 8 mL of NS for the treatment of the pain associated with MPS of the low back. Significance: This will be the first TPI study to compare ST, to TPI with local anesthetic, and TPI with NS for LBP conducted in an ED. It will also be the first TPI study to incorporate a patient centered functional outcome and patient follow-up after discharge from an ED. TPI's are a popular treatment modality for LBP among many Emergency Medicine Providers. However, to date, there is limited evidence for or against it. The investigators are hopeful that this study will answer whether or not trigger point injections are benefiting patients and, if so, which type of TPI is most beneficial.

The Investigators aim to evaluate the effectiveness of dry needling treatment in addition to stretching exercises on cramp duration, cramp intensity, cramp frequency, sleep quality, and sensitivity of myofascial trigger points in patients with nocturnal calf cramp.

Motor neglect describes a loss of function without a loss of strength, reflexes or sensation. Motor neglect has been described in patients with traumatic brain injury, stroke and chronic pain conditions, e.g. complex regional pain syndrome. These conditions affect hundreds of thousands of patients in the UK each year and motor neglect is a significant obstacle in their rehabilitation towards a good outcome. By focussing on improving motor neglect, outcomes including function and quality of life for these groups of patients may significantly improve. Motor neglect is potentially reversible. Rehabilitation using repetition, feedback and motivation are beneficial for optimal outcome. Current protocols use face-to-face physical therapies which can not optimise intensity due to a lack of resources. Furthermore, engagement with exercise is recognised to be poor, in part, due to a lack of attention. Innovative technologies may well improve engagement. Furthermore, telemedicine, or remote delivery of healthcare, offer opportunities in resource management, which can be delivered through the use of such innovative technologies. Virtual reality systems have been designed and utilised in rehabilitation in various conditions, e.g post-stroke, cerebral palsy and Parkinson's disease. Studies demonstrate improved function in both upper and lower limbs. Potentially more effective treatments for motor neglect utilising such technology are therefore available but need more formal evaluation. This protocol describes a Phase II randomised controlled trial for both in-patients and out-patients requiring rehabilitation with motor neglect from neurological causes (stroke, traumatic brain injury) and chronic pain conditions (Complex Regional Pain Syndromes, chronic low back pain and referred leg pain (sciatica)). The intervention will be a novel interactive virtual reality system using established technology and tailored software used in conjunction with a treadmill. The control group will be the same screen showing random static images whilst on the treadmill. Rehabilitation for each group will be offered in 3-4 sessions per week for 2 weeks. Each session will last about 30 minutes supervised by a physiotherapist. Follow-up will be by questionnaire at weeks 2, 6 and 12 and by face-to-face consultation at weeks 2 and 12.