L-carnitine in Modulating Pain and Inflammation in Rheumatoid Arthritis
Rheumatoid ArthritisThis study aims at evaluating the possible efficacy and safety of L-carnitine in rheumatoid arthritis via targeting Jak/STAT pathway and TGF-β1
High-intensity Interval Exercise in Rheumatoid Arthritis
Rheumatoid ArthritisCardiovascular performance and overall fitness can be improved by high-intensity aerobic activity, and these benefits may be achievable by persons with rheumatic diseases. The investigators hypothesize that a 12-week high-intensity interval exercise program will provide substantial improvements in cardiovascular function, inflammation and symptoms affecting quality of life.
Effect of Nonsurgical Periodontal Therapy (NSPT) on Rheumatoid Arthritis Subjects With Periodontitis...
PeriodontitisRheumatoid ArthritisPeriodontitis (PD), a chronic inflammatory disease which results in irreversible attachment loss, bone destruction and, if left untreated, tooth loss. Rheumatoid arthritis (RA), is an autoimmune disease characterized as a chronic inflammatory disorder leading to synovial inflammation and destruction of cartilage and bone. RA and PD which are commonly seen in elderly have many similarities in terms of pathophysiology and clinical progression. Previous findings from the investigators reported that inflamed periodontal tissues of RA subjects with PD are a potential site for post translational modification of proteins as there was increase in presence of citrullinated and carbamylated proteins in gingival tissues. Autoantibodies to these proteins have been reported to be involved in loss of immune tolerance which leads to RA and its progression. Currently there are gaps in our knowledge concerning the effect of nonsurgical periodontal therapy (NSTP), comprising oral hygiene instructions, scaling and root surface debridement on presence of these autoantibodies and inflammatory outcomes of RA. It is hypothesized that reduction in periodontal inflammation may concurrently reduce the systemic inflammatory load which is responsible in perpetuating RA joint inflammation. Here, the investigators propose to perform a randomized, controlled, single-blinded study on RA subjects with stage 2 or 3 periodontitis to assess the effect of NSTP on the reduction of these autoantibodies and inflammatory mediators as well as RA related disease activity measures such as ESR, CRP and Disease Activity Score 28-joint count (DAS28). The investigators will also assess changes in subgingival microbiota associated with RA-PD in response to NSTP using next generation sequencing. This study will help determine if RA individuals could benefit from early and appropriate NSPT, thus reducing periodontal inflammation and a similar impact on RA disease could be expected. This will ultimately improve patients' quality of life and reduce societal burden related to increased patient discomfort and treatment costs.
A Randomized Placebo- and Active Comparator-controlled Study to Evaluate the Photosafety of SAR441566...
Rheumatoid ArthritisThis is a single center randomized parallel-group partially-blinded, 4-arm Phase 1 study to evaluate the phototoxic potential of two dose levels of SAR441566 treatment compared to placebo and the active comparator, ciprofloxacin, in healthy adults, 18 to 55 years of age. There will be two parts: Part I is a randomized placebo-controlled trial comparing sensitivity to ultraviolet (UV) light in participants treated with SAR441566 to those treated with placebo. Part II is an open label arm consisting of participants treated with ciprofloxacin which induces mild phototoxicity and serves as a positive control.
Methotrexate and Metformin in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients
ArthritisRheumatoidMethotrexate (MTX) is the anchor drug for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Despite its marked efficacy and acceptable side effect profile, about 1/3 of patients failed to reach RA remission. Metformin is the first-line therapy for type 2 diabetes. Its antioxidative and anti-inflammatory properties make it a good candidate for the treatment of inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis.
A Study of TJ003234 in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients
Rheumatoid ArthritisStudy Purpose and Design: A Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of Single Ascending Dose and Multiple Ascending Doses of TJ003234 in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients.
BIOTIPRA: BIOmarker-guided Treatment Decisions In Psoriatic and Rheumatoid Arthritis
ArthritisRheumatoidTNFi drugs remain the most prescribed first-line biologics for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, up to 40% of RA patients fail to respond to TNFi treatment. One explanation of non-response is the development of anti-drug antibodies and low drug levels. Studies have consistently shown that: Serum drug levels of monoclonal antibodies (such as adalimumab, certolizumab, infliximab) and the presence of anti-drug antibodies in samples taken at 3 and 6 months correlate with subsequent response at 12 months. Non-responders and those who develop anti-drug antibodies are less likely to receive concomitant methotrexate or, if they do receive it, are on lower doses than responder groups. However, it has not been proven that knowing that a patient had low drug levels or anti-drug antibodies would have improved the outcome; neither has it been shown that introducing or increasing the dose of methotrexate would reduce the formation of anti-drug antibodies, thereby improving outcome. Observational data has revealed that RA non-responders, who exhibit adequate serum drug levels and no detectable anti-drug antibodies, have lower probability of response to another agent with the same mechanism of action (MOA), and may benefit in switching to a drug with a different MOA (12). RA non-responders, who have low detectable serum trough levels and detectable anti-drug antibodies, may benefit in switching to a less immunogenic drug (13, 14). These patients may have a predisposition of developing immunogenicity against the introduced foreign protein (12). Neutralising anti-drug antibodies against the TNFi etanercept or the T-cell co-stimulation inhibitor abatacept have not been detected (10, 12, 15). Furthermore whilst the use and dose of methotrexate at initiation of TNFi, has been associated with lower levels of anti-drug antibodies in our work and others (10, 16), it is not known if increasing the MTX dose once immunogenicity has developed reduces anti-drug antibodies and leads to improved treatment response. Whilst algorithms have been proposed based on these tests (4, 17, 18), they have not been confirmed in a randomised controlled trial setting to show that the intervention (testing) is effective. Based on our preliminary work in an observational dataset, this feasibility study will allow us to design a definitive study to answer the important issue of whether pharmacological testing can be utilised as robust biomarkers to optimise future patient outcomes. The next essential step, therefore, is to prove that introducing these tests improves clinical outcome. It is very important to do so because some clinicians are already requesting that their immunology laboratories introduce such tests; yet the tests themselves are expensive and have not yet shown efficacy (19). Conducting a clinical feasibility trial is one of the essential first steps in development of a full clinical trial to undertake process evaluation and assess the proposed study design, required number of participants and ensure optimum project completion. The proposed trial is a clinical feasibility trial with the aim to ensure a realistic assessment and capability to conduct the full clinical trial. Participants with RA, commencing adalimumab or certolizumab will be randomised to determine whether providing test results on adalimumab/certolizumab drug levels and anti-drug antibodies at 4 weeks, 3 and 6 months to clinicians caring for patients with RA (n=15 patients) starting on treatment with adalimumab/certolizumab, improves the course of disease activity, compared to standard care (n=15 patients). Clinicians will be provided with feedback and a treatment algorithm. The feasibility of the study will be assessed by a number of factors including evaluation of recruitment, attrition, data completeness and process evaluation. The results will be used to inform the number of participants required to fully evaluate the intervention.
Examination of Efficacy and Safety of Baricitinib in RA Patients
Rheumatoid ArthritisThe aim of this study is to examine the efficacy and adverse events in the following 3 groups in rheumatoid arthritis patients: Baricitinib treatment for 12 months Biologics treatment for 12 months Tofacitinib treatment for 12 months
A Safety & Efficacy Study of Treatment With AP1189 in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients naïve to DMARD...
Rheumatoid ArthritisThe study is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of 12 weeks daily treatment with 100 mg AP1189 in RA patients who are to start up-titration with methotrexate (MTX).
Phase 2b Study of MBS2320 in Participants With Methotrexate-Refractory RA
Rheumatoid ArthritisRheumatoid arthritis (RA) affects 1 percent of the population worldwide and up to 40 percent of patients don't respond to current treatments. MBS2320, the drug being tested in this trial, represents a new approach to treating RA, with the potential not only to reduce levels of inflammation but to also directly prevent bone damage. The aim of this project is to test the safety, tolerability and efficacy of MBS2320 in patients with RA in combination with an existing treatment, methotrexate. Approximately 224 participants with moderate to severe active RA who have not responded to treatment with Methotrexate will be enrolled from around 45 to 55 sites around the world. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive 1 of 3 doses of MBS2320 (5 mg, 20 mg, or 40 mg) or placebo (a "dummy" drug). The maximum duration of study participation for a participant will be 22 weeks, which consists of a Screening Period of up to 4 weeks, Treatment Period of 12 weeks, and a Follow-up Period of 6 weeks. Participants on the study will be asked to attend the hospital or clinic for regular visits during which they will have planned study assessments to evaluate the effectiveness, tolerability and safety of the study drug.