Active clinical trials for "Rhinitis"

This study was designed to assess safety of an investigational nasal spray in the treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis. Perennial allergic rhinitis is triggered by house dust, mite and mold etc. Typical symptoms are sneezing, nasal congestion and pruritus and rhinorrhea.

This is a Phase 4 randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, single-center, double-blind study to evaluate the effects of mometasone furoate nasal spray (MFNS) in subjects with Sleep-disordered Breathing (SDB) associated with perennial allergic rhinitis (PAR) using Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow (PNIF), Embletta device home-monitored cardiopulmonary evaluations, and rhinitis evaluations and questionnaires. Approximately 30 subjects 18 to 60 years of age with symptomatic PAR (with or without SAR) will be selected and randomized at one study site. The anticipated duration of subject participation in the study is approximately 39 days. Subjects who qualify at the Screening Visit will complete a 10-14 day run-in/screening period. Following the run-in period, subjects who meet the qualifications at the Baseline Visit will be treated with study medication for 4 weeks.

This study is in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis(SAR)and will compare the effect versus placebo of repeat doses of intranasal GSK256066 using the Vienna Challenge Chamber. GSK256066 is a potent and highly selective phosphodiesterase-4 (PDE4) inhibitor, currently in development by GSK for the treatment of allergic rhinitis, asthma and COPD. Subjects will be selected on the basis that they display a defined moderate response to the pre-determined dose used. Opportunity to assess the efficacy of compounds versus placebo at maximal and trough plasma concentrations. This study aims to explore the actions of repeat doses of intranasal GSK256066 in patients with Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis in the Vienna Challenge Chamber compared to placebo. 12-lead ECG, vital signs and adverse event enquiries will be made throughout the study. Nasal examination, symptom scores (TNSS), nasal lavage, nasal scrape and allergen challenge assessments will also be performed at various time points throughout the study.

The purpose of this study is to find out if a new investigational vaccine, TOLAMBA™, is safe and effective in reducing the symptoms of ragweed allergy.

Various chemical modifications of allergens have been attempted to enhance efficacy, improve safety, and foster compliance with IT. These approaches have been unsuccessful - in that the allergenicity and immunogenicity have either decreased, or increased in tandem, with no resultant efficacy: safety benefit ratio. This study utilizes an adjuvant approach in which synthetic immunostimulatory DNA is conjugated to ragweed allergen in an attempt to modulate both the clinical and immunologic allergic response to ragweed exposure in ragweed-allergic patients with seasonal rhinitis.

The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of grass pollen immunotherapy on symptoms, bronchial hyperresponsiveness and quality of life in seasonal rhinitis and asthma. Hay fever symptoms and medication use, health-related quality of life, and measurements of non-specific bronchial responsiveness were recorded during the study period.

This study will be an open-label, randomized 2-way cross-over study to evaluate bioequivalence study between levocetirizine ODT and levocetirizine IRT in healthy Japanese male subjects. Approximately 48 subjects will participate in this study to receive a single dose treatments of levocetirizine ODT 5 milligram (mg) or levocetirizine IRT 5 mg. In Part 1, subjects will randomized in 1:1 ratio (12 in each Period) in Period 1 and 2 to receive single dose of levocetirizine ODT 5 mg with water or single dose levocetirizine IRT 5 mg with water in fasted state. In this part, comparison of bioavailability of levocetirizine ODT and levocetirizine IRT when taken with water in the fasted state will be assessed. In Part 2, subjects will be randomized in 1:1 ratio (12 in each Period) in Period 1 and 2 to receive single dose levocetirizine ODT 5 mg without water or single dose levocetirizine IRT 5 mg with water in fasted state. In this part, comparison of bioavailability of levocetirizine ODT without water and levocetirizine IRT with water in the fasted state will be assessed. There will be at least a 5-day wash out period between the intervention periods. The duration of each subject's participation in each part will be approximately 7 weeks from screening to follow-up.

The primary objective is to assess whether 16 weeks of treatment with dupilumab as an adjunct to Timothy Grass Subcutaneous Immunotherapy (SCIT) improves upon the efficacy of Timothy Grass SCIT to reduce provoked allergic rhinitis symptoms, as measured by Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) after nasal allergen challenge (NAC) with Timothy Grass extract at week 17. The secondary objectives of the study are: To assess whether 16 weeks of treatment with dupilumab as compared to placebo reduces provoked allergic rhinitis symptoms, as measured by TNSS after nasal allergen challenge (NAC) with Timothy Grass extract To assess whether 16 weeks of treatment with dupilumab as compared to dupilumab + SCIT reduces provoked allergic rhinitis symptoms, as measured by TNSS after nasal allergen challenge (NAC) with Timothy Grass extract To assess changes in serum Timothy-grass-specific immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4), serum Timothy grass-specific immunoglobulin E (IgE), and ratio of serum Timothy Grass-specific IgG4 to IgE over 16 weeks of treatment with dupilumab + SCIT as compared to SCIT monotherapy To evaluate the safety and tolerability of 16 weeks of treatment with dupilumab as an adjunct to Timothy Grass SCIT

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of mometasone furoate (SCH 32088) aqueous nasal spray 200 mcg once daily compared to placebo once daily in the treatment of participants with seasonal allergic rhinitis. Flonase (fluticasone propionate) nasal spray 200 mcg once daily has been chosen as the active control for this study.

Allergic rhinitis is one of the chronic illnesses. At present, the major treatments for allergic rhinitis are avoiding allergens, medical treatment and surgery. However, inadequate effects, and possible side effects of these treatments are still problems to these patients. Therefore, to find an effective non-medical and non-surgical treatment will be of great help in treating patients with allergic rhinitis. Infrared-C (far-infrared) ray irradiation is able to promote normal operation of autonomic nervous system, to improve blood circulation and thereby assumed to relieve discomfort symptoms of patients with vascular, specific or non-specific allergic rhinitis. Consequently, infrared-C ray irradiation is expected to be effective for the treatment of allergic rhinitis. The investigators aimed to probe the adjunct effects of infrared-C ray irradiation in terms of infrared-C hot compress in improving allergy symptoms like sneezing, rhinorrhea, nasal obstruction, nose and conjunctiva itching during a medical treatment for patients with allergic rhinitis. Moreover, the impact of infrared-C irradiation on health and life quality enhancement will also be studied.