Active clinical trials for "Cicatrix, Hypertrophic"

Patients undergoing routine surgery in the Department of Dermatology for any indication on non-scalp skin and closed in linear fashion with scar greater than or equal to 4.5cm in length will be invited to participate in this split scar, head to head study comparing zinc oxide and petrolatum. Patients will apply respective ointments to each half of scar daily for one month and maintain a log of these activities. They will be seen at 1 week, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 6 months post-operatively for photographic scar assessment and to complete the patient portion of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS), a quantitative objective assessment of scar appearance. Trained observers (board-certified dermatologists) will score the observer portion of the scale. POSAS outcomes, post-operative infections, linear density of epidermal seal will be assessed at the 1 week, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 6 months post-operative periods and compared between the two groups. Participants will have parking validated for all visits and upon completion of all portions of the study will receive a standardized skin care gift bag containing samples for hypoallergenic skin care products (washes, moisturizers, etc.).

The goal of this clinical trial study: is to determine the effect Botulinum toxin type A iontophoresis in hypertrophic scars for post burned patients. The main question is it aims to answer is: Does Botulinum toxin type A iontophoresis may help in minimizing postburn hypertrophic scars? Participants will receive the treatment for 3 months. Assessment will be done before and after treatment.

Executive Summary Hypertrophic scars are irregular, raised scars that can cause debilitating symptoms including pain, pruritus, and restricted movement in nearby joints. There are also often significant psychosocial elements with these scars that are especially significant in the vulnerable pediatric population and their parents. Current scar treatment modalities are limited. In recent years, the advent of ablative fractional laser (AFL) resurfacing technology has shown great promise but there remains a need to expand high-level evidence and develop optimal laser treatment parameters for patients. In this study, the investigators aim to evaluate the efficacy of ablative fractional CO2 laser treatment of hypertrophic scars in children and define a set of laser treatment parameters to develop a treatment protocol that maximizes the safety and efficacy of AFL therapy in the pediatric population. This will be a prospective split-scar clinical trial at Alberta Children's Hospital. A sample size of 44 scars will be sufficient to detect a clinically significant improvement in total POSAS score, our primary outcome measure. Children (age 1- 17) who present with hypertrophic scarring following an acute injury or burn may be included in the study. All patients will receive standard scar treatment modalities and will be followed by our plastic surgery team and rehabilitation team. Each scar being studied will be split into two halves which will be assigned a unique "Site ID" that will be recorded in a data collection sheet and used to identify scars for assessment. All laser treatments will be performed by a single surgeon using the UltraPulse CO2 Laser (Lumenis, Israel) and will be done at the Alberta Children's Hospital in the main operating room under a general anesthetic. Patients will receive laser treatments at 4 to 8-week intervals for a total of 3 sessions. A combination of the SCAAR FX and Deep FX treatment modes, with or without Active FX treatment mode, will be used according to individual patient and scar characteristics. Data collection includes demographic data and original burn data. Assessment tools including the POSAS and SCAR-Q questionnaires, clinical photographs, and cutometer will be used at various time points to document changes in scar appearance and pathology over the study period. Mean values for the cutometer measurements as well as the POSAS and SCAR-Q questionnaires will be compared between laser-treated and control scar sites. Each of these datasets will be tested for normality using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Non-parametric data will be compared using Wilcoxon signed-rank test and parametric data will be compared using Student's t-tests.

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell (hUCMSC) therapy in patients undergoing medium-thickness skin grafts for donor site wounds. The study aims to answer the following main questions: Question 1: Does hUCMSC therapy improve the healing quality and speed of donor site wounds in comparison to standard treatment? Question 2: Does hUCMSC therapy reduce scar formation in the donor site wounds? Participants in this study will undergo medium-thickness skin grafts, and those in the treatment group will receive hUCMSC therapy. The main tasks for participants will involve regular follow-up visits, monitoring of wound healing progress, and assessment of any potential side effects or complications associated with the therapy. In order to evaluate the effectiveness of hUCMSC therapy, researchers will compare the treatment group receiving hUCMSC therapy with a control group that receives standard treatment alone. The aim is to determine if the use of hUCMSC therapy leads to improved healing outcomes and reduced scar formation compared to the standard treatment group.

Piezoelectric drived microneedling treats refractory skin disorders using hollow microneedles assisted by ultrasound. Mechanically, the injection of medicine by hollow microneedling could makes the distribution of medicine more evenly. And the addition of ultrasound technique improves the effectiveness of microneedling. Investigators plan to conduct a pilot study to investigate the efficacy of using piezoelectric drived microneedles in treating refractory skin diseases.

Overview: The application of gel sheets holds promise for both the prevention and treatment of hypertrophic scar after deep dermal injuries. Although some positive results have been published, a Cochrane review of the data concluded that the trials were of poor quality therefore only provided weak evidence for their benefit. One of the limitations of previous studies has been the subjectivity and potential bias of the evaluation tools that were used. The validation of electronic instrumentation for the measurement of hypertrophic scar and determination of their superior clinometric properties provides the basis from which precise, systematic, evaluations can now be performed that will allow for confident conclusions to be made. Thus, the objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of a non-silicone gel sheet relative to a patient-matched control site in a prospective, randomized, controlled, within-patient study. This study has been piloted and the data used to establish the number of participants that will be required for an adequately powered study. Specific Objectives: To characterize the changes in vascularity, thickness, pain and itch in adult burn hypertrophic scar (HSc) following an extended course of treatment with a non-silicone based gel sheet relative to matched control scars. To characterize the changes in pliability of adult burn HSc following an extended course of treatment with a non-silicone based gel sheet relative to matched control scars. Recruitment: Burn survivors aged 14 years and more, who have developed HSc and are being treated at CHUM and Villa Medica Rehabilitation Hospital. Risks: There is a minimal risk that the gel used in this project might cause minor redness (10-25% if the use instructions are not followed). The rash quickly resolves once the gel sheet is removed. Study Site: This study will be carried out at Villa Medica Rehabilitation Hospital.

The study includes two study groups, one involves treatment with auto-cross-linked Hyaluronic acid by intralesional and hypodermic injection, repeated after two weeks (T14), while the control arm provides an equal treatment but with isotonic saline solution. Enrolled patients will be randomized into 2 groups with an allocation of 2:1 in study treatment arm and control arm respectively. They will be evaluated using the POSAS scale before the treatment and re-evaluated at 30, 90 and 180 days after treatment. The scar evaluation will be completed by an ultrasound assessment at time 0 (T0), 30 (T30), T90 and T180 and the DLQI (Dermatology Life Quality Index) to be assessed at time 0 (T0), 30 (T30), 90 (T90) and 180 (T180). In subjects that will consent, a small surgical biopsy for an explorative evaluation of the scar tissue will be performed before (T0) and after treatment (T30) for a histological assessment.

Hypertrophic scars and keloids are frequently encountered in plastic surgery OPD. due to any reason, the normal wound healing is impaired, hypertrophic scars or keloids occur. These are thickened, wide and raised scars. Many treatment options are presented over time, but most of the treatments remain insufficient. Treatment options include massage therapy, silicone sheet, occlusive dressings, pressure garments, adhesive tape, intra-lesional steroid injections, laser therapy, cryotherapy, radiotherapy, 5-fluorouracil, interferons, bleomycin, imiquimod 5%cream, tranilast, botulin toxin and surgical excision. In this Study outcomes of treatment with silicone sheeting and microneedling will be compaired.

Approximately 33 to 91% of severe burn victims will develop hypertrophic scars. Hypertrophic scars are defined as erythematous (red), raised and rigid scars that can cause pain and itching, among other things. They cause psychological distress and affect the quality of life of burn victims. Microneedling is a technique that uses an electrical device to create hundreds of microchannels that penetrate the skin layers. This study is interested in determining the effectiveness of microneedling in improving the pliability, thickness and erythema of hypertrophic scars. Each scar will receive up to 5 ACS-pen treatments followed by the application of cortisone (triamcinolone acetonide). Knowing that microneedling increases the absorption of products applied to the skin by about 80%, it is logical to think that creating these channels to the dermis and applying cortisone afterwards would have a beneficial effect on the hypertrophic scars of these patients.

Laser treatment of hypertrophic burn scars has become increasingly popular for improving scarring in burn survivors. Despite its common use, there a gap in knowledge regrading randomized control trials that demonstrate whether the laser is beneficial. Such a trial is important because if it shows the laser does work, it would provide the evidence to make such treatments more accessible to all patients. Furthermore, there is no knowledge whether the burn injury used to remove tissue is beneficial or not. This study aims to evaluate the laser treatment, removal of similar tissue amounts with 0.5mm punch biopsies, to controls to fill this knowledge gap. The hypothesis is the laser is beneficial at improving patient's burn scars. Also the punch biopsies work better at improving scars by removing tissue without burning and injuring the surrounding tissue as the laser does. To evaluate these treatments (laser, punch biopsies, and no treatment), 3 small areas will be chosen in a study scar area that meets specific criteria to receive . Patients will still be able to receive laser and burn reconstruction procedures in all other areas not involving the study scar area that are clinically indicated. In the study, the scar will be evaluated with photographs, surveys, and tissue samples taken either while under anesthesia except for one set taken with numbing medicine. The tissue samples will be looked at under a microscope to see how the treatments change the scar tissue. The tissue will also have tests done to evaluate how the laser impacts genes from cells in the scar tissue. Lastly, to understand how reconstructive procedures (laser and surgical treatments) change a patient's quality of life, patients will be asked a limited set of questions to learn more how these procedures improve their lives.