Active clinical trials for "Schizophrenia"

The purpose of this study is to describe relapse rates among participants receiving services in the SEEC program high intensity resource use. For purposes of this study, relapse will be defined as: Psychiatric hospitalization; Psychiatric emergency department visits; Ambulatory acute services (Partial Hospitalization Program, Intensive Outpatient Program, Crisis House stay).

Schizophrenia is a progressive psychiatric disorder with a lifetime prevalence of 1%, its etiology is not fully understood, and it progresses with relapses. There are significant differences between patients in the age of onset, frequency of attacks, response to treatment, and clinical course of the disease. Failure to respond adequately to treatment is defined as resistance to treatment and poses a great challenge in the clinical management of the disease, but the exact cause of treatment resistance has not been clarified yet. Neurodevelopmental hypothesis, neurodegenerative hypothesis, stress-diathesis hypothesis are some of them. In the neurodegenerative hypothesis, it is thought that biochemical changes cause chronic and progressive disorders of the nervous system, and schizophrenia is considered as one of these disorders. S100B, one of the biomarkers released from the central nervous system, is a glycoprotein synthesized by astrocytes; At low concentration, it ensures neuron survival, while at high concentration it causes neuronal cell apoptosis and is associated with neurodegeneration. GFAP on the other hand, can be measured in serum in proportion to the degree of damage by passing into the bloodstream as a result of astrocyte damage. It has been shown that these markers are associated with neurodegenerative diseases, autoimmune diseases and cerebrovascular pathologies and can be measured at a significant level in the blood. As far as is known, neurodegeneration has been found in patients with schizophrenia; however, there are not enough studies in the literature regarding the relationship of this neurodegeneration with treatment response and resistance. In recent years, many biomarker studies related to schizophrenia have been conducted. These studies continue in many different areas such as the early diagnosis of schizophrenia, the treatments to be applied after diagnosis, the response to the treatment given, and the clinical course of the disease, but no biomarker indicating the desired results has yet been found. In this study, measurement of s100B and GFAP serum levels in patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia, remission schizophrenia and healthy controls, and evaluation of their relationship with response to treatment; Thus, it is aimed to investigate these points that have not been fully elucidated in the pathogenesis of schizophrenia and their use as biomarkers in predicting the response to treatment.

Schizophrenia is a heritable complex phenotype whose symptoms can be clustered into three domains: positive symptoms, negative symptoms and cognitive impairments. Constellations of negative symptoms in SCZ are composed of diminished motivation and pleasure, such as asociality, anhedonia, and avolition, or diminished expressivity such as blunted affect and alogia. Negative symptoms are associated with decreased quality of life and poor functional outcomes. Although antipsychotics are generally effective on positive symptoms, they are poorly effective on negative symptoms Currently, there are no licensed targeted medications for negative symptoms. In view of these problems, considerable interest in identifying new treatment targets for negative symptoms has grown over the past decade. Despite intense efforts in brain imaging that have opened new opportunities for addressing these issues, the neurobiological mechanism of negative symptoms remains unclear. Structural brain measures from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are highly heritable and representatively have high reproducibility and low measurement error. Prior neuroimaging researches have consistently shown neuroanatomical abnormalities in the brains of individuals with SCZ, with the most robust and consistent group-level structural differences in widespread reduced volumes of hippocampal thalamus, amygdala and nucleus accumbens. SCZ have been associated with widespread structural brain abnormalities, but results from neuroimaging studies have been inconsistent.

Cross-sectional observational study of the relationship between speech patterns and psychiatric symptoms and disorders.

People with serious mental illness often report difficulties with thinking skills like memory. These difficulties can make it harder to perform day-to-day activities. The purpose of this study is to test whether combining a type of non-invasive brain stimulation with computerized cognitive exercises is acceptable to participants, and whether it is helpful in improving a specific type of memory skill in people who have mental health conditions and memory deficits. This study is designed so that all participants will get both treatments: the non-invasive brain stimulation and computerized cognitive exercises. Half of the participants will start with both the brain stimulation and the cognitive exercises (dual therapy), and half will start with just the computerized exercises (monotherapy). After three weeks, participants will switch to the other condition: the people who did both treatments first will switch to just the cognitive exercises alone, and the people who started with the cognitive exercises alone will then switch to doing both the brain stimulation and cognitive exercises. Overall, participants will be in the study for about 7-8 weeks. The brain stimulation treatment involves 10 visits to the clinic over 3 weeks. The computerized cognitive exercises can be done at home, and involve 10 hours of exercises over 3 weeks. Participants will also complete paper-and-pencil assessments at the beginning, middle, and end of treatment.

In order to control a behaviour, investigators need to realise goal directed actions and to priories some actions. This control is required in unusual situation. Appropriate actions are selected and coordinated according to context and aim. Several studies try to draw a model of executive function. Recently, Koechlin has suggested a three levelled organisation to explain how the prefrontal cortex controls actions. Contextual control is useful to answer appropriately with the immediate context. Episodic control allows selecting the action according to specific information given before. Sensorial control is the automatic response when a stimulus is presented. Some diseases like schizophrenia are associated with neurological dysfunction in prefrontal cortex. Chambon and al (2008) have identified a dysfunction of contextual control in schizophrenia. As the prefrontal cortex is involved in motivational process, it seems interesting to study potential links between executive function and motivation. A study from Kouneiher shows contextual and episodic activation of motivation in healthy population. Investigators aim to study the way motivational process are recruited in schizophrenia.

Washington University Early Recognition Center is conducting a research study to examine brain functional connectivity and network patterns in participants with bipolar disorder and schizophrenia.

PPI is an objective measure to assess pre-attentive processes that have already been tested before in the case of schizophrenia. The investigators aim to assess through this instrument two main characteristics, that the investigators assume are of relevance which are the duration of illness and the type of pharmaceutical treatment, patients receive. The investigators believe these two main characteristics are critical to the ability of the patients in improvement of their PPI response to startle reflex.

The primary objective of this study is to explore hospitalization (number, length and reasons for psychiatric hospitalizations) in young, adult, newly diagnosed schizophrenia participants during the first 12 months of treatment with once monthly paliperidone palmitate in naturalistic clinical settings.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether the use of atypical antipsychotic medication increases the risk of hospitalization for a hyperglycemic emergency. The investigators will carry out separate population-based cohort studies using administrative health databases in eight jurisdictions in Canada and the UK. Cohort entry will be defined by the initiation of a new antipsychotic medication. Follow-up will continue until hospitalization for a hyperglycemic emergency or the end of 365 days. The results from the separate sites will be combined to provide an overall assessment of the risk of hyperglycemic emergencies among new users of various antipsychotic drugs.