Active clinical trials for "Sepsis"

Ethanol Locks as an Adjunct Treatment for Central Venous Line Infections Purpose To evaluate the effectiveness of a 70% ethanol lock solution when used as an adjunct therapy with antibiotics to treat central venous line infections Study Design Randomized Controlled Trial Study Protocol Only those patients meeting all inclusion criteria and no exclusion criteria will be eligible to participate in this study. Once identified, signed informed consent will be obtained from the patient's guardian and the patient himself/herself depending on age. Patients will be randomized into 2 groups: Group 1 - those patients who will receive ethanol lock therapy and Group 2- those patients who will receive placebo therapy in the form of a heparin lock solution. Outcome Measures Treatment success as defined by- Clearance of the infection as documented by negative blood cultures on day 6 (one day after completed of lock treatment) Preservation of the line at 30 days post treatment (day 35 of the study), this will be documented by a chart review in CIS and telephone interview to ensure no further growth from blood cultures or infections Treatment failure as defined by- Clinical worsening during treatment Removal of the line due to persistent infection or sepsis Recurrence of infection with the same pathogen within 30 days

Phase 3 multicenter study to be conducted in up to 90 qualified participating sites globally to assess the efficacy and safety of Reltecimod vs placebo in patients with sepsis-associated Stage 2/3 AKI.

The main goal of the study is to investigate the clinical relevance, efficacy and safety of treating hypotensive cirrhotic patients with suspicion of sepsis and on vasopressors with low-dose hydrocortisone in order to reverse hemodynamic instability and organ failure and to decrease mortality.

In hypotensive septic patients with controlled source, an hemodynamic management protocol including hypertonic saline (HS)and terlipressin improves MOD (Multiple Organ Dysfunction) Score by at least 3 points compared to the use of physiologic saline and norepinephrine. The appropriate design for this trial would be factorial. For the time being, will consider de intervention as a whole unit for this pilot study. In the future an appropriately sized factorial multicentric study shall be necessary. Other goals of the pilot study: HS restores preload parameters adequately HS associated with terlipressin normalizes blood pressure in septic shock HS associated with terlipressin maintains plasma sodium levels 130-155mEq/L There is an inverse relationship between plasma sodium and procalcitonin levels HS increases plasma levels of vasopressin (AVP) HS rises levels of cortisol but not of adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH)

The purpose of this study is to determine whether macrolide treatment of patients with severe sepsis has an advantageous immunomodulatory and clinical effect compared to severe septic patients without macrolide therapy. Our main hypothesis is macrolide use in addition to standard therapy in severe septic patients has an advantageous immunomodulatory and clinical effect compared to patients with severe sepsis not treated with a macrolide.

The purpose of this study is to investigate the safety and tolerability of AP in sepsis patients with renal failure and to investigate the effect of AP on inflammatory and clinical parameters in sepsis patients with renal failure.

This is an investigator sponsored double-blinded, multinational, multi center, randomized (2:1 active:placebo), placebo-controlled, phase IIa trial in severe pneumonia patients with severe sepsis or septic shock, investigating the safety and efficacy of co-administration of Iloprost and escalating doses of Eptifibatide for continuous intravenous infusion in totally 36 patients.

Background: Researchers are testing a new way to find out what causes infections in people in hospitals. Current techniques use chemical or biological tests on a person s samples. Samples are blood, tissue, stool, saliva, urine, etc. Researchers are testing new techniques that use a device called MiSeq. It can sequence all of the DNA (genetic material) in a sample. This may show microorganisms, such as bacteria, fungi, and viruses that cause infection. Researchers want to know if the new test works as well or better than current tests. They will do this by looking at about 250 samples. Objective: To test if MiSeq works as well as or better than current tests to identify microorganisms that cause infection. Eligibility: NIH patients whose samples have been sent to the Microbiology Service s lab for routine microbiologic testing. Design: Participants will consent to have samples they gave as part of their routine medical care used in the study. For those under age 18, a parent or legal guardian will consent.

The focus of this study will be to conduct a prospective, randomized controlled trial (RCT) at Cape Regional Medical Center (CRMC), Oroville Hospital (OH), and UCSF Medical Center (UCSF) in which a fluid treatment-specific algorithm will be applied to EHR data for the detection of severe sepsis. For patients determined to have a high risk of severe sepsis, the algorithm will generate automated voice, telephone notification to nursing staff at CRMC, OH, and UCSF. The algorithm's performance will be measured by analysis of the primary endpoint, reductions in in-hospital mortality.

Sepsis is a life-threatening dysregulated immune response to infection associated with multi-organ failure and a high mortality rate.While researchers have focused mainly on acute sepsis, post-sepsis care of survivors has long been neglected despite the observation that many sepsis survivors suffer from debilitating post-sepsis syndrome. This syndrome is characterized by frequent hospital readmissions and increased mortality due to persistent immune dysfunction, cardiovascular disease, and cognitive impairment, causing poor quality of life and a substantial burden on the healthcare system. Disconcertingly, the number of sepsis survivors at risk for hospital readmission continues to rise.7 Of the post-sepsis symptoms, post-sepsis immunosuppression is perhaps the most clinically important. While sepsis presents as an initial phase of hyperinflammation (a "cytokine storm"), it is followed by an immunosuppressive phase that is now understood to last weeks to months and predisposes survivors to lethal secondary infections and sepsis recurrence. A third of deaths eight years post-sepsis are caused by recurrent sepsis.We hypothesize that changes in the transcriptome and DNA methylome in immune cells of survivors might be the underlying driver for prolonged immunosuppression, and may also be correlated with long-term morbidity and mortality post-sepsis, as well as other symptoms of post-sepsis syndrome including PTSD and cardiovascular disease.