Active clinical trials for "Sleepiness"

The primary objective of the study is to determine whether armodafinil treatment is more effective than placebo treatment in patients with excessive sleepiness associated with shift work disorder (SWD) by measuring improved clinical condition late in the shift, including the commute home.

Multicenter randomized double blind study versus placebo during 12 weeks with at first, an escalating dose period followed by stable dose period at the selected dose. This double-blind period can be followed by a 9 months open-label period if the patient wishes to continue with the study product.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether a compound known as EVT 201 is effective in treating elderly patients diagnosed with primary insomnia who also have moderate daytime sleepiness.

Many patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) have sleep problems, including excessive sleepiness during the day. This is probably due to degeneration of sleep-regulating areas in the brain. At present, the only treatment for sleepiness in PD is modafinil, which is expensive and only partially effective. There is another potential treatment for sleepiness that is used worldwide, is inexpensive, well tolerated and safe - namely, caffeine. There have also been suggestions that caffeine may slow the progression of degeneration in PD, since coffee non-drinkers are at higher risk of developing PD. PD patients, even with severe sleepiness often do not use caffeine. It is unclear whether this is because their PD makes their sleepiness unresponsive to caffeine, because they cannot tolerate it, or whether this reflects their lifelong habit of non-use. This proposal outlines a trial in which patients with excessive sleepiness will be given caffeine or placebo (no therapy) in a blinded fashion. In this way, the effect of caffeine on sleepiness and motor symptoms can be directly analyzed. In addition, these findings can be used to test the tolerability of caffeine, to help plan a larger-scale study testing whether caffeine can slow the progression of PD

The primary objectives of the study are to determine the effectiveness of PROVIGIL treatment, compared to placebo treatment, in children and adolescents with excessive sleepiness (ES) associated with obstructive sleep apnea/hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS), as assessed by: mean sleep latency from the Multiple Sleep Latency Test (MSLT) (average of 4 naps performed at 0900, 1100, 1300, and 1500) at the last post baseline observation (week 6 or early termination) the Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) ratings for ES, at the last post baseline observation (week 6 or early termination).

The primary objective of this study is to determine whether treatment with Armodafinil (CEP-10953) is more effective than placebo treatment for patients with residual excessive sleepiness associated with obstructive sleep apnea/hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS) by measuring mean sleep latency from the Maintenance of Wakefulness Test (MWT) (30 minute version) (average of 4 naps at 0900, 1100, 1300, and 1500) and by Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI C) ratings (as related to general condition) at week 12 (or last postbaseline visit).

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of administering a single intravenous (IV) infusion dose of TAK-925 to adults with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) who are experiencing excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) despite adequate use of CPAP as the primary OSA therapy.

The purpose of study JZP110-401 is to evaluate solriamfetol pharmacokinetics (PK) in the breast milk and plasma of healthy postpartum women following the administration of the drug. The study also aims to estimate the potential daily solriamfetol dose received by the infant from the breast milk of the nursing mother. The safety and tolerability of single oral doses of solriamfetol will also be assessed.

The aim of this study was to analyze the effects of strength training on sleep quality and daytime sleepiness in institutionalized adolescents (14 to 19 years of age). Thirty-one adolescents were randomly assigned in two sample groups: intervention group (IG, n = 19) and control group (CG, n = 12). Anthropometric measures were performed (height and body mass) and BMI was determined. Sleep quality and daytime sleepiness were assessed using the questionnaires, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESE), and total sleep time by accelerometer. Physical training (2x / week) was performed for 12 weeks. The OMNI Perceived Exertion Scale for Resistance Exercise (OMNI-RES) scale was used to control the effort intensity and the exercises followed an alternate pre-follow-up.

The first objective of this study is to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of pitolisant given at 10, 20, or 40 mg per day versus placebo during 12 weeks of the Double Blind period, to treat the Excessive Daytime Sleepiness (EDS) in patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) refusing the nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (nCPAP) therapy or treated by nCPAP but still complaining of EDS. The secondary objectives of the study include assessing the long-term tolerance as well as the maintenance of efficacy of pitolisant given at 10, 20 or 40 mg per day during 39 weeks of Open Label Extension period and further investigating the co-variates or co-medications that affect the pharmacokinetics of pitolisant in the target population.