Active clinical trials for "Status Epilepticus"

Compare the efficiency of the association, first line, the intravenous levetiracetam and the intravenous clonazepam, in that of a monotherapy of clonazepam intravenous in the pre-hospital treatment of tonicoclonic generalised status epilepticus.

Identify the most effective dose of valproic acid when used in combination with phenytoin for treatment of patients with refractory status epilepticus, which allow a better clinical course and prognosis of the disease.

The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of Lorazepam on Japanese patients with Status Epilepticus or Repetitive Status Eplilepticus.

The purpose of this study is to determine if the investigational treatment, MHOS/SHP615, is safe and effective in children with status epilepticus (SE) (convulsive) in the community setting. This study is open-label extension for patients who completed the SHP615-301 study and who tolerated and responded to MHOS/SHP615 treatment in the hospital setting.

Convulsive status epilepticus (CSE) is a potentially devastating condition which can result in significant morbidity and mortality. Studies addressing status epilepticus in children are rare and there is a paucity of large randomised controlled trials in children looking at forms of drug treatment for SE. There is consistency worldwide in guidelines for first line treatment of CSE with benzodiazepines, with slight variations in type and route of administration of agents. Second line therapy usually entails phenobarbital or phenytoin parenterally. Both repeated phenobarbital loading doses and midazolam infusions have been shown to be effective and safe in the management of established convulsive SE, but there are no prospective randomized controlled trials comparing the two in children. Our study has been undertaken to review 2 existing, and routinely used, interventions for children presenting to our center with acute convulsive seizures. In order to permit comparable data to be collected we are randomly allocating these standard interventions prospectively. This is in order to compare the efficacy and safety of two treatment protocols (phenobarbital vs phenytoin and midazolam) both of which as stated are already part of existing standard protocols internationally and in South Africa. Parenteral phenobarbital is a safe, affordable and easy to use drug in the management of status epilepticus especially for poorly resourced communities where undertaking infusions may be unsafe, time consuming or unavailable. We hypothesize that repeated phenobarbital loading is as effective and safe, or more so, than phenytoin followed by midazolam infusion in the management of established and refractory childhood convulsive SE. If proven, then the former would be a viable option for all health care workers with access to intravenous routes (including Day hospitals) where infusions are unsafe, time consuming or unavailable.

This study is a phase 1, open-label, crossover, comparison study to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) of a single IM administration of 10 mg midazolam using Rafa's auto-injector compared with seizalam in healthy adults. All subjects will participate in both study periods which will span 28 days following a pre study screening visit.

Status EPILEPTICUS (SE) is a major medical emergency. The incidence per 100,000 population has been estimated at 9.9 episodes in Europe and 41 episodes in the US. The overall morbidity and mortality associated with convulsive SE (CSE) is 60% at three months. The alteration of functional prognosis of these patients is more conventionally attributed to the cause than to CSE itself. Longer seizure duration, progression to refractory status EPILEPTICUS and presence of cerebral insult are strong factors independently associated with a poor functional outcome. These three factors offer may be amenable to improvement and hope for preventive strategies. Current guidelines recommend the use of anticonvulsant treatment whose goal is prompt cessation of clinical and electrical seizures. None of these treatments has demonstrated NEUROPROTECTICE property. Therapeutic moderate hypothermia (between 32 and 34 ° C) showed interest in neuroprotection of post anoxic coma patients after a cardiovascular arrest on ventricular fibrillation by reducing morbidity and mortality in about 20% without major side effects. This technique has been used successfully in various pathologies such as stroke or traumatic brain injury. Pathophysiological mechanisms involved in epileptogenesis and neurotoxicity induced by persistence of seizures can be blocked by therapeutic hypothermia. Recent work on experimental models of SE demonstrated neuroprotective and anticonvulsant interest of therapeutic hypothermia. Therapeutic hypothermia has also been successfully used in some cases of particularly refractory CSE. Its early use in patients with SE would have a double interest: neuroprotective and anticonvulsant. There is currently no published studies or ongoing to determine the interest of its early use in patients with CSE.

The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of MHOS/SHP615 administered buccally in children with status epilepticus (convulsive) in a healthcare setting.

This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SAGE-547 administered as a continuous intravenous infusion to subjects in Super-Refractory Status Epilepticus (SRSE).

This research is being done to observe the safety, tolerability, side effects, and effectiveness of the ketogenic diet in people with continuous seizures (status epilepticus) being treated in a neurointensive care unit.