Active clinical trials for "Infertility"

A prospective cohort study in IVF patients at 5 IVF centres in Denmark. The primary aim is to include patients positive for abnormal vaginal microbiota to an RCT (EUDRACT 2016-002385-31). Secondary aims are the prevalence of abnormal vaginal microbiota in women undergoing IVF treatment, intimate hygiene and relations to the vaginal microbiota, basic fertility work up in relation to vaginal microbiota.

All couples planned for IVF will be asked to participate. After information and received informed consent they will be randomized into two groups. At the time for ovum pick up during an IVF procedure either half of the amount of seminal plasma or the same amount of physiological NaCl solution will be installed around the external cervical opening in vagina. The syringe with seminal plasma or physiological NaCl solution will be prepared according to a prearranged randomization list by a technician. The success rate will be the number of diagnosed pregnancies and live births.

rFSH and HMG are both used to controlled ovarian stimulation for patients submitted to IVF. However, there is a debate in the literature which one is better to induce ovulation in patients receiving GnRH antagonist to block premature Luteinizing Hormone (LH) secretion. The investigators propose a Randomized Clinical Trial (RCT) to investigate the differences among recombinant FSH and HMG in patients submitted to IVF using GnRH antagonists.

Ther purpose of this study is to show equivalence between AFOLIA and Gonal-f® with regard to the number of oocytes retrieved in women for assisted reproductive treatment.

The rational of the study is to assess the implantation, pregnancy and live birth rates after the transfer of frozen- thawed embryos in natural cycles with spontaneous Luteinizing Hormone (LH)/Progesterone rise or in natural cycles controlled by human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) for final oocyte maturation and ovulation.

A couple that does not achieve pregnancy though regular attempts for a year are defined infertile couple. This condition is caused by faulty functioning of the reproduction system of the husband or wife or both. If there are no organic defects and there is no definite injury to the reproductive system (ova or spermatozoa), the specialist doctor generally decides to put the couple into a fertility treatment program. Artificial insemination is one of the important ways of achieving pregnancy. Three common methods of artificial insemination: Placement of a diaphragm that contains raw spermatozoa or isolated improved spermatozoa in an appropriate liquid solution (Cup insemination, CI) upon the cervix. Spermatozoa injection (after improvement) through the vagina to the cervix (Intra-Cervical Insemination, ICI). Spermatozoa injection (after improvement) directly into the uterus (IUI-Intra-Uterine Insemination). The EVIE - Slow Release Insemination method: The slow release insemination is utilizing a Grasby type MS16 pump for 3 hours. The release rate for motile spermatozoa is 50X103 per minute. Advantages: Very close approximation of the natural procedure in which the spermatozoa arrive to the fertilization site over a long period. An extended "window of opportunities" for meeting between the ovum and spermatozoa will be longer. There is no loss of spermatozoa due to leaking as sometimes happens with single-time injection practiced in the IUI method. Primary Endpoint: Accumulation of 50 cycles of SRI- slow release insemination (study group) in addition to 50 cycles of regular IUI (control group). Two weeks after insemination Beta hCG test Secondary Endpoints: Four weeks after insemination - US Viability scan Procedure: Subjects will be women with fertility difficulties who are designated for IUI treatment. 100 insemination cycles will be conducted. (50 regular IUI and 50 EVIE-SRI). Subjects that were treated with the IUI method and who does not become pregnant will then be treated with the EVIE-Slow Release method and vice versa.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether embryo transfer on day 3 versus day 5 shows a significant difference in implantation, clinical pregnancy, live birth, miscarriage and multiple pregnancy rates among women with at least two previous IVF failures

Oocyte donation is a well established procedure in assisted reproduction treatments (ART). It is demonstrated that the use of hormonal substitution therapy, for the synchronization of the cycles between the recipients and the donors, provides good results, similar to the ones obtained with the natural cycle. In the patients - recipients with preserved ovarian function, the recipient's natural cycle is annulled, thus preventing the spontaneous Luteinizing Hormone surge. Simultaneously and while waiting for the suitable donor, her endometrium is prepared. When the donation occurs and fertilization with the husband sperm takes place, her cycle is stimulated again in order to synchronize her window of implantation with the donor's ovulation. Two different medications are commonly used to inhibit spontaneous ovulation: either GnRHa agonist or GnRH antagonists. The present study consists of the comparison between the single dose GnRH agonist (Decapeptyl 3,75 IM) and the 7 day dosage of GnRH antagonist (Cetrotide 0,25 mg). The administration of GnRHa is used fundamentally as a long liberation formulation, administered in a single intramuscular injection (IM), which is more practical in terms of use. Nevertheless, the unnecessary persistence and the potentially unfavorable action of GnRHa during the luteal phase and early gestation have questioned its use. The recovery of the Hypophysarian function begins only 8 weeks after the single injection of long liberation of triptorelina 3.75 mg. The GnRH antagonist (Cetrotide 0,25 mg) makes the hypofisary inhibition shorter than with the analogues and can prepare similar endometrium characteristics as a natural cycle. The recipients will be assigned randomly to a group of treatment or another.

Frozen Embryo Replacement (FER)is a fertility treatment by which stored embryos from a fresh IVF treatment cycle are thawed and transferred into the uterus. Frozen embryos can be replaced either in the middle of a natural menstrual cycle (Natural FER) or in a cycle where the woman takes drugs to suppress her own hormones, and then takes Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT) to prepare her uterus for the transfer of embryos(HRT - FER). Both are widely used methods of fertility treatment. However, to date no well designed studies have been reported in which the two methods have been compared. This study aims to compare the two treatments in order to establish the best treatment protocol. The study design is a single centre open randomized controlled trial funded by the Oxford Fertility Unit. 100 women who are considering FER treatment at the Oxford Fertility Unit and are eligible for the study will be recruited. After giving their written consent they will be randomised to one of 2 groups: Natural FER and HRT FER. Patients in both groups will be asked to attend one initial visit, which is additional to patients not taking part in the study. Subsequent visits will depend on the treatment group but will not be additional for study participants. All visits requiring ultrasound will involve recording 3-D measurements, which increases the length of each visit by approximately 10 minutes. A patient satisfaction questionnaire would be completed at the end of the cycle. A urinary pregnancy test is performed at home 2 weeks following the embryo transfer visit. If this is positive then further visits to the unit are arranged to confirm the clinical pregnancy. Inclusion in the study would not increase the length of time of either treatment cycle. Follow up would extend to obtaining pregnancy outcome information.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the influence of endometrial biopsy on increasing implantation rate in patients with recurrent implantation failures, 93 women with at least two implantation failures were evaluated. In case group endometrial biopsy was obtained from 48 patients in the luteal phase of previous cycle and implantation and clinical pregnancy rate were compared with 45 patients in control group. The results suggest that in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection after endometrial biopsy increase pregnancy outcome.