Active clinical trials for "Surgical Wound"

TITLE: "Incidence of parastomal hernia: Randomized clinical trial comparing the longitudinal fascial incision (" Hepworth hitch ") vs. cruciate incision in the exteriorization of a end colostomy ". DESIGN: Randomized, open and parallel clinical trial so patients will be assigned to the cruciate incision group or longitudinal incision with a 1: 1 allocation ratio. POPULATION: Patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery a definitive end colostomy. OBJECTIVES: The main objective is to compare the parastomal hernia rate diagnosed by imaging at 2 years after surgery. Secondary objectives are: Clinically relevant parastomal hernia rate by physical examination 2 years after surgery. Incidence of postoperative complications related to the stoma (dehiscence, retraction, stenosis, necrosis, surgical revision, prolapse and special needs of care of the stoma in the immediate or late postoperative period); 3) Incidence of postoperative complications assessed according to the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) scale. 4) Ease / difficulty in the management of stomatherapy devices by patients using VAS (Visual Analogue Scale). DESCRIPTION OF THE INTERVENTION: An end colostomy without placement of a prophylactic mesh will be performed in all patients. In the group 1A, a longitudinal incision will be made in the anterior rectus fascia and in the posterior fascia, with two Prolene sutures at the ends of the incision of the anterior aponeurosis. In patients of group 1B, a cruciate incision will be made in the anterior rectus fascia, as well as in the posterior fascia. DURATION OF THE STUDY: The expected duration of the study is 3 years. PATIENT FOLLOW UP TIME: The planned follow-up time is 2 years. EXPECTED RECRUITMENT TIME: 12 months.

Objective and Principle: To evaluate whether enlarging the incision can reduce corneal complications associated with phacoemulsification with regular 2.2 mm incision. The aim of this study: To evaluate whether the technique of enlarging internal incision could reduce the incidence of descemet membrane detachment after 2.2 mm incision phacoemulsification. Secondary outcome: To evaluate whether the technique of enlarged internal incision can reduce other corneal complications such as corneal edema and astigmatism after 2.2 mm incision phacoemulsification. Study Design: A prospective randomized controlled study

It is the purpose of this study to evaluate the relationship between a low transverse, vertical midline, and supra-panicular high transverse skin incisions and the rate of wound complications in women with a BMI of 40 or greater undergoing a cesarean section for delivery. So far, the choice of incision for the morbidly obese is based only on case reports. No randomized controlled trials have been done up to date comparing these methods. It is our hope that a high transverse incision will have all of the benefits of a low transverse skin incision, with the added benefit of better exposure offered by a vertical midline incision, without the added increased risk of subjecting the woman to a vertical hysterotomy.

The aim of this study is to assess the prevention of incision healing complications in patients undergoing revision TKA and THA treated with either Single-Use NPWT (PICO) compared to standard of care dressings (AQUACEL Ag Surgical Dressing). All patients undergoing a revision TKA and THA who consent to taking part in the study, and meet the eligibility criteria will be included onto the study. Patients will be followed up for a period of up to 3 months to determine if there are any latent incision healing complications

A comparison of skin closure techniques (standard skin closure with staples versus a continuous (subcuticular) absorbable suture), to determine if this changes the rate of post operative wound infections in elective colorectal surgery patients.

A number of studies identifies abdominal hernia as the most frequent postoperative complication following laparotomy with percentages of 9-20% - depending on duration of follow-up. It is based on a multifactorial basis, including factors concerning individual, patient-specific factors, factors related to the operational technique as well as particular surgical factors. Wound complications have been reported by 7-12%, burst abdomen rate (dehiscence) < 5 days being 2-4%, wound infection rate (+/- wound dehiscence) ≥ 5 days being 6-10%. In emergency procedures (e.g. ileus, perforation of hollow organ) a wound complication rate of up to 50 % has to be expected. According to new, first findings from recent studies the rates of wound healing complication and burst abdomen can be reduced significantly. Depending on the study, to almost 50%. The principle is based on the reduction of the stitch length and type of the inserted suture. The stitches are closer and with less distance to the edge of fascia. Due to the much thinner suture it still comes here to a quantitative reduction of the inserted suture. The data collected using the MonoMax® suture in the short stitch technique will be compared to the results of the ISSAAC trial, in which the MonoMax® suture was used in the long stitch suture technique. The generated data are thus subject of retrospective comparison with a historical control group (ISSAAC study).

The purpose of this multicentre prospective trial is to determine the incidence and risk factors for surgical wound infections. Also the investigators will evaluate consequences of wound infections to the patients, and extra costs caused by wound infections.

To better understand surgeon preference when using synthetic, absorbable, monofilament suture by comparing two similar appearing FDA-approved sutures, Monosyn (Aesculap) and Monocryl (Ethicon).

Traditional suture closure of the columellar scar in rhinoplasty is achieved with permanent skin sutures. These sutures create less inflammation and are thought to lead to improved final scar outcomes. However, permanent sutures require removal which creates pain and inconvenience for the patient. Some surgeons use fast absorbing sutures that do not require removal. The difference in final scar outcome based on suture material used has not been well studied. This study will examine the final scar outcomes of rhinoplasty incisions sutured with traditional permanent suture compared to fast absorbing suture. If scar outcomes are similar between these groups as judged by the patients and blinded observers, rhinoplasty surgeons may be able to preferentially utilize absorbable sutures for incision closure and avoid the pain and inconvenience for the patient during suture removal

Aim of this study is to evaluate the post-operative course in patients undergoing diagnostic or therapeutic oral mucosal biopsies. To evaluate the wound healing, all variables connected with the surgery (including post-operative complications) were recorded. To evaluate the psychological and behavioral impact of the post-operative discomfort, two survey tools were administered: OHIP-14 and visual number scale of pain (VNS) were administered at 6h, 7 days and 21 days after biopsy.