Active clinical trials for "Syndrome"

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is considered the gold standard treatment for patients with moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Nasal and oronasal masks are often used interchangeably and are generally believed to be equally effective; the choice of interface for OSA therapy remains largely based on clinical judgement and patients preference. However, there is increasing evidence that CPAP delivered by an oronasal mask may be less effective, requires more pressure and are worse tolerated than nasal mask. Patients with OSA on oronasal mask are also less adherent to CPAP. Some authors have suggested that in some subjects, the CPAP was not effective when an oronasal mask was used. Moreover when pressures are increased to overcome the obstruction, a paradoxical obstruction may take place. Specific mechanisms explaining upper-airway obstruction events remain unclear and it is not known how many patients exhibit this behavior. This observational retrospective study is designed to compare a group of patients with obstructive sleep apnea with persistent obstructive events using oronasal masks during CPAP, that were fully recovered with the shift to nasal one with the same or also lower pressure, versus a control group of patients who did not report obstruction with oronasal masks. Aim of the study was to find differences in term of clinical, anatomical and physiological characteristics between these two groups.

This study investigated the utilization of CranioSacral Therapy (CST) in patients with Post-Concussion Syndrome (PCS) and capture patient-reported perceptions of their lived experiences of treatment effect upon their symptoms. The first part part was a 10 year chart review of patients who sought out CST to capture data from the medical records. The second part was an anonymous post treatment survey.

Background: Frailty is increasing in prevalence internationally with population ageing. Frailty can be managed or even reversed through community-based interventions delivered by a multi-disciplinary team of professionals, but to varying degrees of effectiveness. However, many of the implementation insights of these care models are contextual, and may not be applicable in different cultural contexts. The Geriatric Service Hub (GSH) is a novel frailty care programme in Singapore, that includes key components of frailty care such as comprehensive geriatric assessments, care coordination and the assembly of a multidisciplinary team. The aim of this study is to gain insights on the factors influencing the implementation approaches adopted by five participating sites, and the effectiveness of the programme. Methods: We will adopt a mixed-methods approach that includes a qualitative evaluation among key stakeholders and participants taking part in the programme, through in depth-interviews and focus group discussions. The main topics covered includes factors that affected the development and implementation of each programme, operations and other contextual factors that influenced implementation outcomes. The quantitative evaluation (1) monitors each programme's care process through quality indicators, (2) a multiple-time point survey study to compare programme participants' pre- and post- outcomes on patient engagement (collaboRATE and 13-item Patient Activation Measure;PAM), healthcare experiences (Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and System Clinician and Group Survey Version 3.0; CG-CAHPS), health status and quality of life (Barthel Index of Activities of Daily Living, fall counts, the EuroQol questionnaire and the Control, Autonomy, Self-realization and Pleasure scale; CASP-19), impact on caregivers (Zarit Burden Interview) and societal costs (Client Service Receipt Inventory). (3) A retrospective cohort design to assess healthcare and cost utilisation between participants of the programme and a propensity score matched comparator group. Discussion: The GSH sites share a common goal to increasing accessibility of essential services to frail older adults, and providing comprehensive care. The results of this evaluation study will provide valuable evidence to the impact and effectiveness of the GSH, and inform to the design of similar programmes targeting frail older adults.

The study aim of the project is to investigate the differences in respiratory functions, orofacial muscle tone changes, anxiety/depression, and quality of life of the patients according to the severity of Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome. At the same time, to examine the reliability of the use of the MyotonPro evaluation method, which takes place rapidly in the literature and clinic, in the orofacial pharyngeal muscle group.

The main aims of the study are to assess the safety profile of Teduglutide (Revestive®) in people with Short Bowel Disease as well as how well people respond to the treatment with Teduglutide (Revestive®). This study is about collecting data only; participants receive Teduglutide (Revestive®) by their doctors according to the clinical practice but not as part of this study. Only standard care information available in the participant's medical records will be reviewed and collected for this study. Participants do not need to visit their doctor in addition to their normal visits.

The purpose of this study is to reveal the effectiveness and satisfaction of integrative Korean medicine for Failed Back Surgery Syndrome(FBSS) by observation patients treated with integrative Korean medicine. This study is a prospective observational study. The subjects for study are patients diagnosed with Failed Back Surgery Syndrome(FBSS) and who have been admitted to Gangnam Jaseng Hospital of Korean medicine and Bucheon Jaseng Hospital of Korean medicine for 2011.11-2014.09. Medical records of selected patients will be analyzed, and telephone surveys will be conducted for each patient. The survey questions are Numeric rating scale (NRS), Oswestry disability index (ODI), quality of life, and Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC), etc.

The rationale for this retrospective study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of thrombopoietin-receptor agonist (TPO-RA) romiplostim for reducing thrombocytopenia and bleeding tendency in pediatric participants with genetically confirmed Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome (WAS).

The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of physical rehabilitation performed in intensive care unit on the range of joint motions and muscle strength of survivors following discharge from intensive care unit in patients with COVID-19. Secondary outcome is to assess the duration of mechanical ventilation, length of stay in intensive care unit and in hospital, and mortality rates during intensive care unit stay and health related quality of life following discharge in survivors. Until April 14 patients were provided all the intensive care managements except for rehabilitation and patients discharged before this time constituted the 'non-rehabilitation' group (n=17). Patients discharged after April 14 were provided rehabilitation in addition to usual intensive care unit care and constituted the study 'rehabilitation' group (n=18). Passive range of motion exercises to each joint and neuromuscular electrical stimulation to bilateral quadriceps and tibialis anterior muscles were applied 6 days/week in the 'rehabilitation' group during intensive care unit stay.

Pain is one of the most important factors affecting the quality of life. The quality of life of patients with pain and restricted shoulder movements can be affected in patients with Rotator Cuff Syndrome (RCS).

During the COVID-19 pandemic, a small minority of children have been presenting to acute paediatric services with a new syndrome, Paediatric Inflammatory Multisystem Syndrome temporally associated with SARS-Cov-2 (PIMS-TS). Children with PIMS-TS present with symptoms of inflammation caused by the immune system going into overdrive - this is likely to be in response to the virus. More severe cases involve inflammation and damage to the heart. The focus of this project is to identify children with milder forms of PIMS-TS who are at risk of progression to more severe disease. Being able to predict the disease course of PIMS-TS at an early stage is important as it will allow clinicians to decide which patients should be treated with immunosuppressants, which have been shown to reduce the severity of the illness but have side effects. Early data suggests that children with PIMS-TS have elevated biomarkers associated with an over-reaction of the body's immune system (also known as a 'cytokine storm') reaction. This study will explore whether children presenting with milder PIMS-TS have elevated 'cytokine storm' blood profiles and whether these profiles differ between children who continue to have a mild disease course compared to those who develop severe disease.