Active clinical trials for "Thrombosis"

This is a prospective, multicenter, open-label, randomized, controlled, parallel group study, in which ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) patients with high thrombus burden(TIMI thrombus grade ≥3) are included. Patients are randomized to be treated with or without manual thrombus aspiration(TA) during primary percutaneous coronary intervention(PPCI) by a ratio of 1:1.

A multicentre, parallel group, randomized controlled Phase II clinical trial evaluating neoadjuvant Atezolizumab/Bevacizumab versus neoadjuvant SBRT in patients with biopsy proven solitary HCC with PVTT involving the portal vein branches. Both arms are considered experimental, and as such, a Simon two-stage design will be initially used within both arms. Only if both arms are deemed of interest for further study will a comparison between arms, using a pick-the-winner design, be conducted. Following the completion of neoadjuvant therapy, study participants will undergo a CT scan or MRI to assess tumour response to neoadjuvant therapy. Hepatic resection will be performed for those participants who meet the surgical resection criteria.

This is a Phase 3,multicenter, randomized, open-label, blinded endpoint evaluation study comparing the effect of abelacimab relative to apixaban on venous thromboembolism (VTE) recurrence and bleeding in patients with cancer associated VTE (ASTER)

To explore the safety and feasibility of intra-arterial neuroprotective strategy in acute ischemic stroke patients who received recanalization operation.

The left ventricular (LV) thrombus is an important complication of myocardial infarction (MI) and vitamin K antagonist (VKA) is the current recommended management therapy for these patients. However, lack of regular international normalized ratio (INR) monitoring, drug, and food interaction may leads to increased risk of over or under anticoagulation consequently compromising the effectiveness of the therapy. Hence, due to benefits like predictable dosing and lack of need for regular monitoring, use of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) for these patients is increasing among cardiologists. However, clinical data for the justified use of NOACs in LV thrombus (LVT) are lacking and remained a point of debate among the cardiologists. A recently published Randomized Control Trial (RCT) by Abdelnabi M et al. namely the No-LVT trial, had established the safety of Rivaroxaban therapy in patient with post myocardial infarction (MI) LV thrombus along with promising efficacy. However, sample size of the study (n=79; 39 in Rivaroxaban and 40 Warfarin) was not sufficiently high enough to conclude efficacy of Rivaroxaban in these patients. Therefore, this open label RCT is designed with the primary objective to evaluate the efficacy of Rivaroxaban in resolution of post MI LV thrombus as compared to standard warfarin therapy at the interval of 1 month and 3 months to test the hypothesis that Rivaroxaban is safe and non-inferior in preventing thromboembolic and major bleeding events in these patients.

The investigators will be comparing the effects of two different drug treatment strategies, in patients with history of a heart attack, on different markers of bleeding and clotting risk. Both treatment strategies are already approved for the indication of improving outcomes in high-risk patients with history of heart attack.

Introduction: The prevalence of left ventricular(LV) thrombus after acute myocardial infarction has decreased with thrombolysis and primary angioplasty intervention worldwide. However, most of the patients in our country present late after the onset of ischemia resulting in a comparable increase proportion of late presentation MI compared to developed countries. This delayed presentation is associated with the increased incidence of LV thrombus, associated with increased cerebrovascular and cardiovascular events resulting in increased morbidity and mortality. The Vitamin K Antagonist Warfarin is indicated in recent guidelines for the duration of 3-6 months. The use of Warfarin is less in our part of the world due to the requirement of frequent International Normalized Ration (INR) monitoring and dietary restrictions. Novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are an alternate option for such hindrance to the treatment of LV thrombus. This research will help assess the safety and efficacy of Rivaroxaban, one of the NOACs compared to warfarin. Objectives: Our aim will be to compare the efficacy of rivaroxaban compared to warfarin in the complete resolution of post-MI LV thrombus. The primary efficacy endpoint of our study will be a resolution of LV thrombus as assessed by cardiac MRI at the end of 3 months of the study period. The secondary endpoint will be the comparison of the safety of both drugs measured by the incidence of major bleeding and embolic events. Methods: The patients who present late after acute MI in our center with LV thrombus will be enrolled in our study. The diagnosis of LV thrombus will be diagnosed by cardiac MRI, which is considered the gold standard for the diagnosis. The patients then will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either warfarin or rivaroxaban within 24 hours of diagnosis of LV thrombus. The warfarin group will be prescribed the warfarin in the dose of 5mg daily and the dose titrated according to the INR value to maintain the INR range of 2 to 3. Rivaroxaban group will be prescribed 15 to 20mg according to the indication. The research group consisting of the principal investigator and coinvestigators will be responsible for the recruitment and overall study procedures.

Contemporary data are lacking regarding the management of left ventricular thrombus (LVT) developed after ST segment elevation myocardial infarction

Chronic obstruction of the iliac veins or inferior vena cava can occur as a result of deep vein thrombosis (DVT), or due to extrinsic compression in non-thrombotic iliac vein lesions (NIVLs). This obstruction can manifest as post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) after DVT or as chronic venous disease (CVD) in NIVL. Despite sparse evidence, rates of venous stenting for PTS and NIVLs are increasing. A pragmatic, observer-blind, multi-centre, randomised-controlled trial for adults with CVD secondary to either PTS or NIVLs randomised to either best endovenous therapy (including venoplasty and deep venous stenting) or standard therapy (compression +/- anticoagulation). Included participants will have chronic venous disease (CEAP classification 3 - 6) secondary to proximal deep venous disease. The primary outcome is severity of venous disease at 6 months as ascertained by the Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS).

A multi-center, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded endpoint assessment (PROBE) clinical trial of endovascular treatment among selected AIS.