Active clinical trials for "Tooth Loss"

This study is a randomized clinical trial to compare patient satisfaction and prosthetic outcomes with lower dentures retained by one or two implants. The investigators long-term objective is to establish evidence of the cost-effectiveness of a single implant intervention for improving tolerance to complete dentures. The investigators MAIN AIM will be to investigate patient satisfaction between and within groups with mandibular dentures retained by one or two implants over five years, and SECONDARILY to investigate the survival of implants, and the frequency of events to maintain the dentures and prosthetic attachments as clinically serviceable. Furthermore, multivariate analysis can assess the prediction of patient satisfaction with implant dentures based on various possible factors including age, health, demography and socioeconomic status, number of implants, and maintenance needs. Patient satisfaction will be measured by means of Visual Analogue Scales (VAS) including a measure of overall satisfaction and various specific aspects of satisfaction such as appearance, stability and comfort of the dentures. The CENTRAL HYPOTHESIS is that mandibular complete dentures retained by single implants are at least as satisfying to patients over a five years period as those retained by two implants for the same period. The SECONDARY HYPOTHESES are that: i) there is no difference over five years between groups in the survival of original implants, or in the number of events for maintenance of the dentures or implant attachments; and ii) using each treatment group as it's own control, there is no change in patient satisfaction with lower dentures retained by either one or two implants during the five year loading period.

The aim of this randomized, controlled, multi-center study is to assess the clinical and radiographic outcomes of using a Straumann® Bone Level Tapered implant for immediate implantation following extraction of a tooth in the pre-molar and anterior region of the maxilla and mandible (test) compared to the outcomes of placing this implant in healed sites (control).

The aim of the study is to compare longitudinally the clinical performance of dental implants with different surfaces placed in single tooth gaps at the posterior maxilla and mandible of adults. It is a randomized clinical trial, in which participants will be randomly allocated to two groups: test group (implants with hydrophilic surface) and control group (implants with hydrophobic surface). The null hypothesis is that the implant stability quotient of hydrophilic and hydrophobic dental implants show a similar progression after placement in posterior tooth gaps.

The study will compare the density and strength of regenerated bone in extraction sockets after being grafted with two different materials: Bone Allograft and Bone Allograft with Amnion. The investigators hypothesize that sockets grafted with the Amnion graft will exhibit enhanced healing patterns and will accelerate the formation of regenerated bone in the grafted areas.

To compare dimensional changes in extraction socket of single rooted teeth, 6 months post extraction, when grafted with xenograft versus allograft.

It is a randomized controlled trial to evaluate two surgical techniques for dental implant placement simultaneously with bone augmentation.

Congenitally missing tooth is one of the most common anomalies in human dentition. The treatment options of lateral incisor agenesis are closing the space with orthodontic treatment, implant treatment, conventional fixed dental prosthesis (FDPs) and resin-bonded fixed dentures (RBFDs). RBFDs are used frequently for single tooth absence in the anterior region due to their minimal invasive properties, high clinical success and patient satisfaction. With the development of new and stronger materials, RBFDs with metal framework have been replaced by glass ceramic, lithium disilicate, fiber-reinforced composite (FRC) and zirconia. The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical performance of CAD/CAM single-retainer monolithic zirconia ceramic RBFDs which cemented with two different resin cements.

Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of the Effect of Hyaluronic Acid Surface Treatment Versus Sandblasted Acid Etched on Stability of Delayed Dental Implant in Posterior Maxilla.

Maintaining the general health and well-being of patients is the main goal of dental therapy. However, tooth extraction is indicated when teeth cannot be maintained in a status compatible with health, adequate esthetics, function, and/or for strategic reasons. A variable degree of alveolar ridge atrophy related to bone resorption is initiated immediately after removal of a tooth due to the local physiologic remodeling and the inflammatory response. Ridge resorption is more accentuated in the horizontal dimension, followed by the vertical mid-facial and vertical mid-lingual in non-molar and molar teeth. Among local periodontal phenotypic characteristics, facial bone thickness at the time of tooth extraction seems to be strongly associated with the extent of alveolar bone resorption. Dental implants have increased in popularity due to their unique ability to replace teeth. During the planning phase of implant therapy, one of the main parameters assessed is the amount of residual alveolar ridge. Therefore, when tooth replacement therapy via dental implant is considered, adequate management of the site is critical to predictably preserve or reconstruct the architecture of the alveolar ridge, particularly in the anterior aesthetic zone, where its structure play a crucial role in the maintenance of function, health and esthetics. Generally, with appropriate treatment planning and execution, the adequate primary mechanical stability of the dental implant is achieved. However, bone and/or soft tissue augmentation procedures could be needed for the adequate management of deficient edentulous ridges at the time of implant placement, and these types of treatments could considerably increase the risk of morbidity, treatment expenses, and length of treatment time. Nevertheless, Implant placement with additional bone contour augmentation therapies have shown their effectiveness in the short-, mid- and long-term in contemporary dental practice. However, to the present date, there is no information available in the literature regarding patient-reported outcome measures in patients that received tooth replacement therapy via dental implants with additional contour bone augmentation in the short-, mid- and long-term.

Loss of teeth in the anterior upper jaw significantly affects both well-being and chewing function. Nowadays, dental implants are the treatment of choice for replacing missing teeth with fixed dental prostheses and are often placed in the anterior upper jaw. Depending on various patient-related factors, protocols for the placement of dental implants involve the following time points after tooth extraction: On the same day (immediate implantation) After 1-4 months (early implantation) After more than 4 months (late implantation). The different treatment protocols have been investigated over long periods. The choice of the individually suitable treatment protocol for dental implantation depends on many factors and is of utmost importance in order to achieve the best possible treatment outcomes. Selecting an inappropriate treatment protocol would otherwise result in an increased risk of failure. After decades of research and development in dental implantology, an expert association (International Team for Implantology, ITI) published an evidence-based decision management tool in 2022. This decision management tool assists dentists in choosing the individually suitable implant treatment protocol for single-tooth replacement in the upper jaw. A structured examination of the tooth to be extracted allows to classify the situation and select the most suitable treatment protocol for the individual situation. The treatment protocols differ in terms of time and material requirements, which are associated with different costs. There is limited data about the cost-effectiveness of these treatment protocols. The present study aims to assess how the costs of the three treatment protocols differ in relation to treatment success.