Active clinical trials for "Tooth Loss"

The aim of the study is to prospectively evaluate the survival of JJGC Cobalt-Chromium (CoCr) prosthetic abutments in single-unit implant-supported prostheses, to confirm the long-term safety and performance of the devices.

Regenerating a predictable inter-implant papilla is the most complex and challenging aspect of implant dentistry. The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy of I shaped incision technique and conventional midcrestal incision technique for interimplant papilla reconstruction in a 6 month clinical trial.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the gene-activated bone substitute consisting of octacalcium phosphate and plasmid DNA encoding vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) for maxillofacial bone regeneration. The patients with congenital and acquired maxillofacial bone defects and alveolar ridge atrophy will be enrolled.

Trial Design - Objectives and Purpose The aim of this study is to perform a proof of concept for the successful retention and outcome measures of zirconia RBBs for the replacement of missing canine or posterior teeth (6-8mm span) and that they will exhibit similar survival rates (95%) as metal ceramic RBBs over 3 years and short term (Botelho 2006). The use of monolithic extra-coronal zirconia RBBs in the posterior region does not appear to have been reported in the literature (A search pf Pub Med and Google Scholar has not shown any similar studies that have been published - pubmed.gov; Keywords: "zirconia", "resin", "clinical" assessed on 17/10/2015 AND google scholar; Keywords: "zirconia", "resin bonded fixed partial denture", "resin bonded fixed dental prosthesis", "Maryland", "resin bonded bridge" "posterior", "clinical") In addition, currently there appear to be no clinical trials planned or finished in this area (clinicaltrial.gov; Keywords: "zirconia", "resin" assessed on 17/10/2015) using zirconia RBBs in the posterior region. This reveals that there is a gap in the literature on the use of zirconia for replacing posterior teeth with such prostheses. The primary outcome measures would be: success ie. prosthesis retention ie. does not fall out The secondary outcome measures would be: complications of the prosthesis such as tipping, drifting or fracture. patient centered outcomes (satisfaction and oral health related quality of life) on the RBBs The hypothesis is that 2-unit cantilevered zirconia RBBs will be as successful as current data on 2-unit cantilevered metal-ceramic RBBs from this centre and that there will be no difference in the patient centered outcomes. The Primary review appointments will be at 1, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months. However, longer term follow up will be performed and this centre has experience of such long term studies (9.5 years - Botelho 2014). A randomized clinical trial (RCT) comparing to metal-ceramic RBBs will NOT be performed as the 5-year success rate of both metal-ceramic (Botelho 2006) and anterior zirconia (Sasse 2014) prosthesis were higher than 95% and this small differences would mean an unattainable large sample size in an equivalence test (Burns 2001). Significance and implications Zirconia has significant strength and greater stiffness than base metal alloys and displays clinical outcomes comparable to metal-ceramic conventional crowns and bridges (Heintze 2010, Sailer 2007). Well polished zirconia has been observed to have lower wear rates than porcelain (Stober 2014) Zirconia RBBs for posterior tooth replacement will offer an esthetic and biocompatible treatment option to patients over the traditional ceramic-metal RBBs. It is anticipated that patient demand for this would be high as these prostheses should be as successful (retentive). These results would re-write established dental prosthodontics textbooks and this would be the first centre to report on the routine use of a 2-unit extracoronal all-zirconia RBB for the replacement of missing posterior teeth. Research plan and methodology The sample pool would be obtained from patients presenting at the Prince Philip Dental Hospital, University of Hong Kong and who request and need replacement of one or more missing teeth.. They will be clinically assessed for eligibility and invited to participate with written consent in the study. After treatment they will be reviewed up to a 3rd year endpoint of the study. Further review beyond this will be undertaken.

The study will consist of randomized controlled clinical study trial comparing the results of a demineralized putty allorgraft versus a combined mineralized/demineralized putty allograft in approximately 30 patients, 15 per group. All materials used in the study are FDA approved.

Main aim of this study was to assess survival rates of short implants with a length of 4 mm in the edentulous mandible after 1, 3, and 5 years.

Removable false teeth (called removable partial dentures (RPDs)) are commonly made for people with missing teeth. RPDs are made out of a framework and the replacement teeth/gum. The framework sits on the teeth and the gums and can be made out of different materials, metal or non-metal, with different properties. The plastic teeth and gum sit on the framework. A common framework material is cobalt chromium, a rigid, non-precious metal alloy. Other framework materials include titanium and non-metal materials such as medical grade polyetheretherketone (PEEK). A review of the literature shows that no research has been reported investigating how different RPD framework materials impact on a person's oral health related quality of life (OHQoL). The sensation that different frameworks have in the mouth can be quite varied between people, and it would be relevant to be able to tell patients which type of framework is better tolerated based on research evidence. We hope to conduct an un-blinded randomised crossover pilot trial investigating the difference in patient preference and oral health related quality of life measured by patient centred outcomes in a group of patients due to receive tooth supported removable partial dentures at the Charles Clifford Dental Hospital.

Aim of the present investigation will be to evaluate the role of a bovine-bone mineral and a collagen membrane as ridge augmentation procedure following tooth extraction. 20 consecutive adult patients, requiring tooth extraction in the frontal area of the upper and lower arch maxilla (from second premolar to second premolar), will be enrolled into the study. After tooth extraction, sockets will be randomized and divided into two groups: in Group A the socket will be grafted with Bio-Oss Collagen , in Group B the sockets will be grafted with BioOss granules (small granules). The graft will be covered with porcine collagen membrane (BioGide). Then, the flap will be sutured. MEASUREMENTS: The end of the study will be fixed at the 6 months evaluation after tooth extraction. Impression will be taken before tooth extraction and after 6 months in order to create cast models. On the cast models, using reference PVC (polyvinylchloride) guides, the horizontal dimension of the soft tissues will be measured. One measurement per tooth will be recorded, at T0 (before extraction) and T2 (after 6 months). A 3D radiological image, using the CBCT technique, will be obtained at the end of the surgical stage T1 (extraction + bone graft) and after 6 months of healing. Superimposition will be performed in order to measure hard tissue remodelling. After six months (T6), a a biopsy specimen will be also harvested for that augmented extractions sockets on which an implant installation has been previously planned.

The purpose of the study was to test a clinically relevant non-inferiority of Straumann BoneCeramic treatment compared to Bio-Oss treatment 180 to 240 days after sinus grafting procedure.

Abstract Aim: The primary aim of this study is to test whether or not cement residues in the submucosal environment of implants lead to a change in the microbiota and induce inflammation of the periimplant tissues. Material and Methods: 24 patients in need of a single tooth replacement will be enrolled in this cross-over controlled clinical study. All patients will receive a two-piece dental implant, which will be restored with both a cemented and a screw-retained single crown. At the time of impression taking, patients will be randomized into two groups. Patients in group A will receive a screw-retained crown. Every 8 weeks microbiological samples using sterile paper points will be collected and analyzed for bacterial content by real-time PCR. Additionally, two host markers (MMP8, IL-1ß) will be determined by ELISA. Following this first period of 16 weeks, the screw-retained crown will be replaced by a new intraorally cemented crown. Cement removal will be preformed according to best clinical procedure. These crowns will again be left for another period of 16 weeks and followed up for the harvesting of microbiological samples every 8 weeks. After the second 16-week the crowns will be removed to evaluate any excess cement. All patients will be fitted with the original screw-retained crown. Clinical parameters for inflammation and probing depths will be obtained after each 16 week-period. In group B the crowns will be incorporated in a reverse pattern. During the first 16 weeks any possible cement residues will be removed according to best clinical procedure, while for the second period of 16 weeks patients will be fitted with a screw-retained single crown. Again, microbiological and clinical parameters will be obtained at the same intervals as in Group A. After the second 16 week period the screw-retained crowns will be (re-) inserted in all patients, single tooth x-rays taken and clinical baseline values obtained. Additionally, a soft tissue biopsy will be harvested at the time of insertion of the final screw-retained crown. Patients will be followed up for another 16-week period.