Active clinical trials for "Tourette Syndrome"

Chronic tic disorder (CTD) may have a huge impact on life quality. Habit Reversal Training (HRT) and Exposure Response Prevention (ERP) are effective therapeutic modalities. This study examined the effect of a combined treatment using both HRT and ERP in children and adolescents with CTD. The treatment outcome was examined as an individual treatment compared to a group setting. There was no control group. The study examined both acute outcome and outcome at one year of follow-up. Predictive factors for treatment outcome were evaluated.

The purpose of this study is to examine the effects of EPI-743 on tic severity in adults with Tourette syndrome.

The purpose of this study is to determine if vigabatrin, an unusual anti-seizure medication, will diminish the Tourette Disorder outbursts in young adults whose symptoms have persisted into adulthood and have not responded to usual treatment.

The goal of this study is to confirm that levetiracetam has a better tic-suppressing profile than that of the widely used tic-suppressing medication, clonidine. More specifically, the investigators hypothesize that in a 15 week placebo run-in, double-blind, medication cross-over trial; levetiracetam will be more effective and have fewer side-effects than clonidine.

The goal of the current trial is to obtain long term efficacy, safety and tolerability data of once weekly aripiprazole in children and adolescents with Tourette's Disorder.

OBJECTIVES: I. Conduct a randomized, double blind, placebo controlled, parallel study of the atypical neuroleptic risperidone (RIS) in the treatment of children and adults with moderate to severe Tourette Syndrome. II. Evaluate further the safety of RIS in this population.

This research is being done to determine whether a home-based behavioral therapy can be successfully used to treat tics in children with Tourette syndrome (TS). Behavioral therapy administered by a trained therapist has been shown to be helpful in reducing tics in children with Tourette syndrome. In this study, the investigators want to determine whether an instructional video can provide parents of children with TS with the tools necessary to successfully use behavioral therapy at home. The investigators also want to determine the effectiveness of home-based behavioral therapy as compared to improvement achieved when the therapy is provided by a trained therapist.

Analysis of data from the recently completed NIH Child Comprehensive Behavioral Intervention for Tics (CBIT) study found a manualized behavioral treatment approach strongly superior to psychoeducation/supportive therapy for reducing tic severity in 9-16 year-old youths with TS or other Chronic Tic Disorders. Buoyed by the success of the NIH study, the research group now seeks to extend and disseminate the CBIT treatment through the systematic adaptation of the CBIT protocol for use across a broader range of ages and treatment settings. The goal of the this project is to develop a downward extension of the CBIT therapist guide and parent workbook for use in 4-8 year old children with chronic tics. The revised CBIT-JR manual/workbook will be pilot tested in five children at each of the three study sites (UCLA, UWM, Weill Cornell) in order to provide initial data regarding treatment feasibility and acceptability as well as our ability to implement the new intervention, along with relevant quality control procedures, consistently across sites. These pilot data will then be used to seek R01 support for a larger controlled multisite trial examining the efficacy of CBIT-JR. Although arguably more complex than a single-site design, we have opted for a multsite study in order: 1) to take advantage of the established productive collaborative relationship and collective expertise in childhood tic disorders and psychosocial treatment development across our three sites, 2) to collect the proposed feasibility data in a much shorter period of time than otherwise possible, and as noted above 3) to demonstrate the cross-site portability of the treatment - which will be necessary if we are to obtain subsequent funding for a larger-scale efficacy trial.

This is an investigator-initiated proof of concept study with the purpose to examine the safety, tolerability and feasibility of Dronabinol (synthetic Δ9-THC) and PEA for the treatment of adults with Tourette syndrome.

It is a randomized controlled trial to compare two behavioural treatments, namely CBIT and CoPs. This study would be the first head-to-head randomized trial between two established treatments rather than supportive counseling or wait-list control. Thirty-six adults and 36 children with TS/TD will be recruited into each of the two (CBIT, CoPs) modalities requiring a total recruitment of 72 adults and 72 children over 5 years, which permits, even for a small-medium effect size, a robust power calculation. Motor performance measures will give concurrent validity to changes pre-post in TS/TD motor processes. Recruitment of both males and females will permit sex comparisons. The participants meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria will be assessed at pre-post 1 month and 6 months following treatment on standardized tic scales and global assessment of functioning. Participants will be treated individually on a weekly basis by therapists with an allegiance to each modality and outcome assessed by masked evaluation. The treatments are manualized and will last 10 weeks with 4 weeks of home practice at post-treatment with 6-month follow-up assessment on all outcome measures, plus motor performance measures post-treatment. All treatment sessions will be audio-recorded and assessed with implementation of treatment integrity procedures scales. The hypotheses are that: (1) the CoPs group will show superiority in clinically significant improvement on standard tic scale score, global functioning and quality of life than the CBIT group; and (2) changes in recognized parameters on selected motor tests scored according to published norms will change towards normalization post CoPs but not post CBIT. The outcome data from the two treatments will be analyzed by a mixed linear model adaptation of repeated measures MANOVA and daily diary measures will allow for an additive time series design over the 10 weeks treatment session. This design will allow computation of the size of treatment effects at different stages of therapy. The study results will impact on the treatment of choice and access to treatment for tic disorders and on the conceptualization of tic disorders.