Active clinical trials for "Craniocerebral Trauma"

Children are known to have devastating impact from traumatic brain injury (TBI). The focus of treatment of severe TBI is to limit secondary insult which can aggravate brain injury and worsen outcome and is supported by monitoring brain pressure (ICP) and arterial pressure (ABP). These pressures, if incorporated in Multi-modality monitoring can be used to interpret state of mechanisms used by brain to maintain normal blood flow. This has been advised to guide management of severe TBI in adults, however, there is limited experience with advanced brain monitoring in children. The investigators propose to study the use of this in children with severe TBI. Children (up to 16 years of age) with a severe TBI are referred to a neurosurgical unit (NSU) and admitted to a paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) as part of usual NHS clinical practice. All patients with a severe TBI require a monitoring wire to be inserted into the brain to read the pressure inside the skull and a similar device in an artery to monitor the blood pressure. These recordings are documented by a PICU nurse at a prescribed frequency. Without interrupting this clinical practice investigators propose to record these values using computer software called ICM+. These recordings will provide real time analysis and a continual recording of important parameters which will provide the study with much needed information on the patterns of pressures in the brain after this injury in children. All patients will be followed up for 12 months to see how well they recover, neuropsychology assessment will be performed by a Neuropsychologist at the recruiting centre using a standardised form.

This is a retrospective registry dataset of all adults who presented with cervical and/or skull base fractures or a subdural hematoma at Methodist Dallas Medical Center (MDMC) and had consults to the neurological surgery department beginning in January of 2016, and continuing until a statistically significant number of cases are obtained.

The clinical signs presented by a patient with a mild head injury are highly variable but remain strongly predictive of brain damage. The reference examination for the diagnosis of post-traumatic intracranial hemorrhage is currently the cerebral scanner without injection of contrast medium. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) tends to surpass CT in equipped centers, except for suspected bone lesions. The time required to perform brain imaging depends on the patient's clinical condition, comorbidities and treatments. The responsibility of antiplatelet agents in post-traumatic intracranial hemorrhage is currently discussed, particularly with aspirin. The hypothesis is that there is no significant difference in the proportion of intracranial hemorrhage in patients on antiplatelet agents after mild head trauma, in the absence of other factors favoring the occurrence of intracranial hemorrhage.

Objective: In this study we will develop and apply imaging techniques to perform the first three-dimensional (3-D) measurements of brain biomechanics during mild head movement in healthy human subjects. Biomechanics is the application of mechanics, or the physical principles in action when force is applied to an object, to the anatomical structure and/or function of organisms. Such techniques will be invaluable for building computational models of brain biomechanics, understanding variability of brain biomechanics across individual characteristics, such as age and sex, and determining brain sub-structures at risk for damage when movement of the head is accelerated, such as during a traumatic event. Study Population: Measurements will be performed on 90 healthy men and women aged 18-65. Design: We will build upon the model pioneered by our collaborator, Dr. Philip Bayly. The model places a human subject in a magnetic resonance (MR) scanner with one of two head support units that allows a specific range of motion. Each head support is latched such that it can be released by the subject, and results in either a rotation of the head of approximately 30 degrees or a flexion-extension of the head of approximately 4 degrees. Although both supports are weighted so that the motion is repeatable if the subject is relaxed, the subject can easily counteract the weight. The resulting acceleration/deceleration is small (in the range of normal activities, such as turning one's head during swimming) and has been validated and used in other human investigations of brain biomechanics. The subject repeats the motion multiple times during the MR scan under their own volition and desired pace to measure motion of the head and brain. Outcome measures: This project is a pilot study evaluating the potential of extracting three-dimensional estimates of brain deformation, such as strain measurements, using MR imaging. A primary outcome of this project will be a fast MR acquisition sequence for measuring 3-D brain deformation. The sequence will be evaluated by applying the protocol to human subjects, followed by preliminary quantification of the reproducibility and stability of deformation measurements.

CoRDS, or the Coordination of Rare Diseases at Sanford, is based at Sanford Research in Sioux Falls, South Dakota. It provides researchers with a centralized, international patient registry for all rare diseases. This program allows patients and researchers to connect as easily as possible to help advance treatments and cures for rare diseases. The CoRDS team works with patient advocacy groups, individuals and researchers to help in the advancement of research in over 7,000 rare diseases. The registry is free for patients to enroll and researchers to access. Visit sanfordresearch.org/CoRDS to enroll.

The purpose of this study is to determine the value of including dynamic vision testing into California State University, Northridge (CSUN) Athletics' established concussion protocol. The study's hypotheses are 1) dynamic vision testing will reveal vision impairments right after a person sustains a concussion, 2) these impairments may still be present upon clearance to return to play.

Head injuries are common among children and adolescents, with many of them assessed in emergency departments each year. Most children recover fast, with full resolution of symptoms as headache, dizziness or fatigue. A few, however, develop life-threatening complications (such as bleedings in/around the brain). It can be difficult to swiftly and accurately identify these patients in the emergency department. To aid in this task, decision support tools has been developed. The goal of this observational study is to evaluate a Scandinavian tool developed to aid in management of children with head injuries seeking care in an emergency department. The main research question is: - Are the Scandinavian guidelines for management of mild and moderate head trauma in children sensitive for patient-important outcomes? Patients will be given the same treatment and recommendations for their head injury no matter if they participate or not in the study, as there is no intervention/ treatment group. The doctor or nurse managing the child will collect information on patient history, signs and symptoms in the emergency department and management in an electronic case report form. Information on how the recovery period is collected both from medical records >1 month after the emergency department visit, as well as via electronic questionnaires sent to the guardian at 1 month, 3 months and 4 months after the injury via e-mail and/or text message. Long-term outcome will also be examined (>6 months).

The purpose of the study is to validate the clinical outcome in patients with closed head injuries (GCS 14-15, ages 18-85) who are being evaluated for head trauma, integrating the BrainScope One structural injury classifier (SIC) algorithm, with focus on SIC negative classification. In addition, to assess functional impairment (concussion) in these patients, results from Brain Function Index (BFI) or Concussion Index (CI) algorithms will be used for analysis.

At the emergencies rooms, patients with head trauma meeting one of the NICE criteria, which include antiplatelet inhibitors treatment, are considered as patients with a risk of cerebral haemorrage and are taken systematically for a CT-scanner. However, there are more and more antiplatelet inhibitor's patient with minor head injury traumas seen at the emergencies room and the efficiency of this NICE criteria is controversial on litterature. This study aims to determine that the absence of no other NICE criteria than antiplatelet inhibitors is a sufficient condition to eliminate a cerebral haemorrhage for patients with head injury traumas, and conversely, that antiplatelet inhibitors treatment would not be by itself an indication for a CT-scanner.

Trauma is a critical global health problem. It represents the fifth leading cause of significant disability and is one of the most common causes of mortality in youth and adulthood, as one in 10 deaths worldwide occurred due to trauma. The head is preferred target for criminal acts and is a favorite place for various pathological lesions .Traumatic head injury (THI)is one of the prevalent causes of global death and disability. lately, head injury (HI) cases have increased in both developed and developing nations. Therefore, it is of great value to evaluate the clinical and pathological features of head injury . Every injury that results in harm to the scalp, skull or brain can be sort out as a HI which can be caused by traffic mishap, falls, sports and gunshot wounds. Vehicle accidents are one of the most prevalence causes of THI as they are deemed to be one of the main causes of fatality due to road-traffic accidents (RTA) .Among different type of the RTA, motorcycle accidents holds the number one cause of accident in most of the country . Skull fracture and hemorrhage are common association, which may be present with head trauma and affect the outcome of the case.The skull fractures, especially by blunt force offer varying diagnostic and medico- legal problems to the medical jurists as well as to the clinicians.