Active clinical trials for "Varicose Veins"

The aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of non-invasive echotherapy for the treatment of varicose veins, within local population, using the Sonovein® device. The quality of life scores at baseline, 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months will be assessed using the EQ-50D, AVVQ and CIVIQ scores. Patient satisfaction at these time points will also be assessed.

This study will be looking at the effect of compression therapy in patients having endovenous treatment for truncal incompetence of their varicose veins using either radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or endovenous laser therapy (EVLT). Patients will be randomised to either the compression group (group A) or the no compression group (group B). The pain scores, compliance, quality of life scores, occlusion rate at 6 months as well as the cost effectiveness of each intervention will be assessed.

It will be done a randomized triple-blind study comparing 0,2% polidocanol versus 75% hypertonic glucose of sclerotherapy in lower limbs´ telangiectasis. It will be included only adult women with reticular veins on the side of the thighs and mild venous insufficiency (CEAP 1). The primary endpoint will be efficacy, and secondary will be safety.

A randomised clinical trial comparing endovenous laser ablation and mechanochemical ablation (ClariVein®) in the management of superficial venous insufficiency.

A double blind randomised controlled trial of radiofrequency thermal ablation treatments of great saphenous varicose veins: Venefit (Closurefast), vs. Radiofrequency induced Thermal Therapy vs. Endovenous Radiofrequency. Assessments by visual pain scores, duplex ablation and quality of life questionaires

Evaluation efficacy and safety of Esarin Gel in subjects with chronic venous insufficiency or varicose veins combine superficial vein thrombophlebitis.

A clinical randomized controlled trial, comparing 2 endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) techniques in patients with insufficiency of the great saphenous vein (GSV). There are multiple EVLA devices available, with different wavelengths. In the Netherlands, 940 nm Diode and 1470 nm Nd:Yag laser are the most frequently used devices. Both devices also proven to be equally effective in occluding the GSV. However, little is known about differences in patient-related outcomes. Therefore, the primary outcomes of this comparative clinical trial of 940 nm and 1470 nm EVLA, are pain scores, patient satisfaction and scores of health related and varicose-specific questionnaires. The secondary outcomes are complications and effectiveness of the treatment. It is thought that possibly the 1470 nm ELVA will give lower pain scores and higher patient satisfaction than 940 nm EVLA. No differences are expected in complication rate and effectiveness between the two treatments.

The newly developed Mechanochemical Endovenous Ablation (MOCA) device uses a technique that combines mechanical endothelial damage using a rotating wire with the infusion of a liquid sclerosant. Heating of the vein and tumescent anesthesia are not required; only local anesthesia is utilized at the insertion site. Previously we showed that endovenous MOCA, using polidocanol, is feasible and safe in the treatment of great spahenous vein (GSV) incompetence. However, larger studies with a prolonged follow-up to prove the efficacy of this technique in terms of obliteration rates are lacking. This randomized trial was designed to compare occlusion rate, post-operative pain and complications between radiofrequency ablation (RFA: the current treatment for GSV incompetence) en MOCA.

our aim is to compare early outcomes following EVL 1320 nm and segmental RF in a randomized study.

Cirrhosis leads to portal hypertension and development of gastroesophageal varices, which are the most common cause for bleeding in cirrhosis and a major cause of death. The American Association for the Study of Liver Disease (AASLD) recommends screening endoscopy every 2 years to evaluate for gastroesophageal varices, and annual surveillance for those with small varices on endoscopy. Unfortunately, endoscopy is costly, requires sedation, is poorly tolerated, is subject to high inter-observer variability, and is associated with risks that include bleeding, esophageal injury and aspiration. Noninvasive methods for evaluation of gastroesophageal varices are needed. CT is noninvasive, rapid, less expensive than endoscopy, requires no sedation, provides a quantitative measure of the size of the varices, and allows for assessment of para-esophageal varices, varices in other body locations, ascites, other signs of portal hypertension, patency of liver vasculature, and detection, diagnosis and staging of hepatocellular carcinoma. Single-Energy CT (SECT) has relatively high accuracy in prospective studies for detection of any and large varices but is associated with suboptimal contrast opacification of gastroesophageal varices. Dual-Energy CT with the GE scanners with GSI Xtream (DECT) improves the contrast-to-noise ratio by 60% compared to SECT and is currently standard of care at UAB for evaluation of cirrhosis. The primary objective of this study is to determine the accuracy of DECT for detecting any varices and high-risk varices. The study hypothesis is that the accuracy (AUROC) of DECT will be >0.90 and >0.95 for detecting any and high-risk varices in a prospective pilot study (N=50) that uses endoscopy as the reference standard. This will be a single-center pilot observational prospective IRB-approved study. A total of 50 adult patients presenting to UAB Endoscopy for surveillance endoscopy to detect and grade gastroesophageal varices will be enrolled.