Active clinical trials for "Ventricular Dysfunction"

Clinical trial phase III, prospective, controlled, randomized, open. We hypothesize work that patients with chronic coronary occlusion and poor myocardial viability who failed to recover ventricular function after subjecting coronary revascularization with new techniques of recanalization, could achieve an improvement of ventricular function if given further regenerative treatment with mononuclear cells from autologous bone marrow. To test this hypothesis we designed a prospective, randomized clinical trial in patients with recanalized chronic occlusions and ventricular dysfunction.

A prospective, multi-center, dual-arm pivotal study of the BioVentrix Revivent TC System, with 2:1 study vs. active concurrent control group allocation ratio. This study will include 126 patients of which 84 patients will be treated with the investigational device and 42 patients will be included in an active control group.

The aim of this study is to assess whether increasing oral doses of Riociguat are safe and improve the well-being, symptoms and outcome in patients with pulmonary hypertension associated with left ventricular systolic dysfunction

Currently, the gold standard method to estimate CO in patients with PAH or RV dysfunction is pulmonary artery catheter (PAC), however, the invasiveness and complexity of PAC has limited its usefulness in many clinical scenarios. By measuring the thoracic electrical bioimpedance, electrical cardiometry (EC) technique has been reported to noninvasively estimate cardiac output (CO) and other parameters related to cardiac contractility and fluid status in various cardiovascular disorders. However, in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and/or right ventricular (RV) dysfunction, few study has been reported. The aim of this study is to evaluate the agreement between CO measured by PAC as the referenced method and CO measured by EC technique in patients with PAH and/or RV dysfunction.

In postoperative thoracic surgery (lobe resection, pneumonectomy or wedge resection), cardiovascular complications are the most frequent (10 to 15%) with a significant morbi-mortality rate. Right ventricular (RV) dysfunction is a complication that can be multifactorial in post thoracic surgery. The RV longitudinal shortening fraction (RV-LSF) is a new 2D-STE parameters able to more accurately detect patients with RV dysfunction compared to conventional echocardiographic parameters. This project is a single-center, prospective, interventional study of patients hospitalized at the Amiens University Hospital for scheduled thoracic surgery. TTE is performed preoperatively, at day 2 and day 15 following the thoracic surgery. Echocardiographic parameters will be measured by an echocardiographic expert in offline with a dedicated software. MACE criteria will be collected at day 2, day 15 and day-30 following the thoracic surgery.

This is a randomized, prospective, single-blinded trial to determine the overall rate of successful His-Purkinje conduction system pacing Optimized Trial of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (HOT-CRT) versus biventricular pacing using coronary sinus lead (BVP) to compare acute and mid-term outcomes. Acute outcomes include change in QRS duration pre-and post-pacing (degree of QRS narrowing) and incidence of major periprocedural complications (pericardial tamponade, need for lead revision, etc.). Mid-term outcomes include echocardiographic response at 6 months along with a composite clinical outcome of heart failure hospitalization, ventricular arrhythmias, crossover, and all-cause mortality.

This is a Phase 2, single-center, randomized placebo controlled trial of valsartan (an angiotensin receptor blocker) in adults with pulmonary arterial hypertension. The study will evaluate the safety and clinical efficacy of a 24-week course of valsartan.

Heart failure (HF) represents a major problem in today's health care landscape and is expected to grow in the next years due to an aging population and improved treatments. In many cases, the evaluation of the volemia status of patients with left ventricular dysfunction is not easy in the outpatient setting, due to limitations of physical examination in stable patients, as well as the tolerance to chronic HF they have. The aim of this study is to determine whether the bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) is useful in determining the real clinical stability of chronic HF, its potential implications for clinical management and patient follow-up, as well as for the adjustment of pharmacological treatment. This study is observational, single-center, single-blind and outpatient. It includes patients with a previous diagnosis of HF and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 40%, who are stable at the time of inclusion. Follow-up is estimated to be 12 months.

Heart failure (HF) is the most common nosology encountered in clinical practice. Its incidence and prevalence increase exponentially with increasing age and it is associated with the increased mortality, more frequent hospitalization and decreased quality of life. An initial approach to the treatment of HF patients with reduced left ventricular (LV) systolic function and left bundle branch block (LBBB) was implantation of device for cardiac resynchronization therapy using biventricular pacing. This has resulted in long-term clinical benefits such as improved quality of life, increased functional capacity, reduced HF hospitalizations and overall mortality. However, conventional cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is effective in only 70% of patients. And the remaining 30% of patients are non-responders to conventional CRT. Cardiac conduction system pacing is currently a promising technique for these patients. Particularly, His bundle pacing (HBP) has been developed to achieve the same results. According to other studies HBP has shown greater improvement in hemodynamic parameters comparing with conventional biventricular CRT. But, nevertheless, there are significant clinical troubles with HBP, especially high pacing threshold. In this regard, in 2017, the left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) was developed, which demonstrated clinical advantages compared to conventional biventricular CRT. Also, since 2019, left bundle branch pacing-optimized CRT (LBBPO CRT) has been used in clinical practice. These methods have become an alternative to HBP due to the stimulation of LBB outside the blocking site, a stable pacing threshold and a narrow QRS complex duration on electrocardiogram. A series of case reports and observational studies have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of LBBP and LBBPO CRT in patients with CRT indications. However, it is not enough data about impact of CRT with LBBP and combined CRT with LBBP and LV pacing on myocardial remodeling, reducing mortality and complications. According to our hypothesis, CRT with LBBP and combined CRT with LBBP and LV pacing compared with conventional biventricular pacing will significantly improve the clinical outcomes and reverse myocardial remodeling in patients who are non-responders to biventricular CRT with HF, reduced LV ejection fraction and with indications to CRT devices with defibrillator function (CRT-D) or one of the CRT-D leads replacement.

The goal of this observational study is to investigate the effects of combination therapy with ARNI and inhibitors of SGLT2 in patients affected by HFrEF. The main questions it aims to answer are: What is the medium-long term impact of the ARNI + glyphozine combination therapy in terms of ventricular remodeling studied by speckle tracking echocardiography (GLS%) and by variation of volumetric indices and contractile function (LVEDV, LVEDD, FE%)? What is the medium-long term impact of the ARNI + glyphozine combination therapy in terms of variation of laboratory data indicative of heart failure (NT-pro-BNP)? What is the medium-long term impact of the ARNI + glyphozine combination therapy in terms of major cardiovascular events (MACVE)? What are the echocardiographic and laboratory parameters predictors of medium-long term major cardiovascular events (MACVE) and ventricular remodeling? Participants will undergo, at the time of enrollment and after approximately 3 and 12 months from the introduction of SGLT-2 inhibitor therapy, at clinical, echocardiographic and biohumoral investigations.