All clinical trials

This study is a single-arm, multicenter clinical study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SBRT combined with cardonilizumab and lenvastinib in the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus

The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to compare letrozole alone versus letrozole plus levothyroxine for ovulation induction in infertile women with both PCOS and subclinical hypothyroidism. The main questions it aims to answer are: Is letrozole plus levothyroxine superior to letrozole alone in achieving ovulation in these patients? Does combining levothyroxine with letrozole lead to higher pregnancy and live birth rates compared to letrozole alone? Participants will be randomized into two groups: Group 1 will receive letrozole only, starting at 2.5 mg daily from day 3 to 7 of the menstrual cycle. The dose will be increased up to 7.5 mg if no ovulation occurs, for a maximum treatment period of 6 months or until pregnancy is achieved. Group 2 will receive letrozole at the same doses as group 1 plus 25 mcg levothyroxine daily.

Children had Down syndrome often have impaired balance and postural control and result as less active than their peers that can lead to reduced quality of life and movement skills. Effects of physical activity may be important in preventing falling risk and health consequences in those children

HDAC inhibitor chidamide and PI3K inhibitor linperlisib has shown clinical activity as mono therapy in PTCL. The combination of duvelisib and romidepsin is highly active against relapsed and refractory T-cell lymphomas including cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (CTCLs). The aim of this study is to further explore the efficacy and safety of HDAC inhibitor chidamide combined with PI3K inhibitor linperlisib in the treatment of relapsed and refractory CTCLs.

A case series to provide post marketing evaluation of the MyPAO surgical planning and patient specific guides technology. This will be a single-centre, multi-surgeon evaluation assessing the safety of the use of these guides in periacetabular osteotomy surgery.

An interventional prospective randomised clinical trial (RCT) in parallel groups is planned. The sample size was 30 patients who will be randomly divided into two groups based on the surgical procedure. The first group is the healing of the donor zone after SCTG harvesting without filling the wound with collagen matrix. The second group is the wound defect closure in the donor area using the collagen matrix "FibroMATRIX" (LLC "Cardioplant", Russia; registration in Russia 20/05/2019 No FSZ 2019/83671). Changes in volumetric parameters of the maxillary tuberosity area after CTG harvesting, severity of pain, postoperative edema, bleeding, analgesic intake and quality of life in the postoperative period will be assessed.

A total of 34 participants, who require replacement of an anterior or posterior single tooth with dental implant, will be randomly allocated to two equal sized groups. In the control group, the osteotomy site preparation will be prepared by using conventional surgical drills, while the test group site preparation will involve the use of Densah™ Burs (Versah Co., LLC., USA) as per the osseodensification protocol. In addition to evaluating implant stability, the trial will also report on implant and patient outcomes at various time points.

Purpose: Multiple formulations and brands of botulinum toxin exist on the market today. Only OnabotulinumtoxinA (BOTOX®) is currently FDA approved for treatment of overactive bladder. IncobotulinumtoxinA (XEOMIN®) is a similar formulation of botulinum toxin A that has similar dosing and safety profile at onabotulinumtoxinA. OnabotulinumtoxinA is the most expensive formulation on the market. Compare the efficacy of incobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin®, Merz Pharmaceuticals) to onabotulinumtoxinA (Botox®, Allergan) for treatment of OAB. Study design: A single-blinded, randomized non-inferiority trial of IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin®, Merz Pharmaceuticals) to OnabotulinumtoxinA (Botox®, Allergan) in treatment of OAB. Target Population: The study findings will be applicable to all women 18 years of age or older with OAB symptoms associated with urinary urgency incontinence. Procedure: All patients that presents to urogynecology clinic at Walter Reed National Medical Military Center will be screened for inclusion and exclusion criteria. Patients that meet criteria will be offered to participate in the study. After enrollment patient will complete demographics data sheet, 24 hours bladder diary, OAB-q SF, PGI-S, PISQ-IR. Patients will be randomized by the principal investigator and the allocated treatment will be reveled by the treating provider to the treating provider only. Patient will have a follow up at 2-6 weeks and 6-9 months after procedure. During the follow up appointments patient will be asked to fill out 24-hour voiding diary, OAB-q SF, PGI-I, PGI-S, and PISQ-IR surveys.

The goal of this clinical trial] is to compare the outcomes between induction to labour at home versus hospitalized. The main questions it aims to answer are: Can the induction to labour at home with cervical rippening ballon increase the vaginal delivery rate? Will the induction to labour at home increase maternal satisfaction Will the induction to labour at home improve medical circuits and coulb it be cost effective? Participants who meet inclusion criteria will undergo randomization so as to be asignated an induction to labour at home or in the hospital. Researchers will compare both labour induction groups to see if the induction to labour at home has better outcomes as described previously.

Psychosis patients with comorbid PTSD will be treated with trauma therapy.