search
Back to results

Multicenter Endoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (ESG) Trial (MERIT Trial)

Primary Purpose

Obesity, Hypertension, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Overstitch Endoscopic Suture System
Lifestyle Intervention
Sponsored by
Mayo Clinic
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional other trial for Obesity

Eligibility Criteria

21 Years - 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

INCLUSION CRITERIA

  1. Age 21-65
  2. BMI ≥ 30 and ≤40 kg/m²
  3. Willingness to comply with the substantial lifelong dietary restrictions required by the procedure
  4. History of failure with non-surgical weight-loss methods
  5. Willingness to follow protocol requirements, including signed informed consent, routine follow-up schedule, completing laboratory tests, and completing diet counseling
  6. Residing within a reasonable distance from the investigator's office and able to travel to the investigator to complete all routine follow- up visits
  7. Ability to give informed consent
  8. Women of childbearing potential (i.e., not post-menopausal or surgically sterilized) must agree to use adequate birth control methods
  9. ***There will be a quota for at least a) 50 patients with hypertension on one or more anti-hypertensive medication, b) 50 patients with type II diabetes mellitus on oral agents only with HgA1c ≤ 9, and thus the cohort of 200 patients will be stratified into three groups (Obesity, Obesity HTH, Obesity DM) and block randomized. No more than 50 participants without comorbidities will be enrolled in the trial.

EXCLUSION CRITERIA

  1. History of foregut or gastrointestinal (GI) surgery (except uncomplicated cholecystectomy or appendectomy)
  2. Prior gastrointestinal surgery with sequelae, i.e. obstruction, and/or adhesive peritonitis or known abdominal adhesions.
  3. Prior open or laparoscopic bariatric surgery.
  4. Prior surgery of any kind on the esophagus, stomach or any type of hiatal hernia surgery.
  5. Any inflammatory disease of the gastrointestinal tract including esophagitis, Barrett's esophagus, gastric ulceration, duodenal ulceration, cancer or specific inflammation such as Crohn's disease.
  6. Potential upper gastrointestinal bleeding conditions such as esophageal or gastric varices, congenital or acquired intestinal telangiectasis, or other congenital anomalies of the gastrointestinal tract such as atresias or stenoses.
  7. A gastric mass or gastric polyps > 1 cm in size.
  8. A hiatal hernia > 4cm of axial displacement of the z-line above the diaphragm or severe or intractable gastro-esophageal reflux symptoms.
  9. A structural abnormality in the esophagus or pharynx such as a stricture or diverticulum that could impede passage of the endoscope.
  10. Achalasia or any other severe esophageal motility disorder
  11. Severe coagulopathy.
  12. Insulin-dependent diabetes (either Type 1 or Type 2) or a significant likelihood of requiring insulin treatment in the following 12 months or a HgbA1C >= 9.
  13. Subjects with any serious health condition unrelated to their weight that would increase the risk of endoscopy
  14. Chronic abdominal pain
  15. Motility disorders of the GI tract such as gross esophageal motility disorders, gastroparesis or intractable constipation
  16. Hepatic insufficiency or cirrhosis
  17. Use of an intragastric device prior to this study due to the increased thickness of the stomach wall preventing effective suturing.
  18. Active psychological issues preventing participation in a life-style modification program as determined by a psychologist
  19. Patients unwilling to participate in an established medically-supervised diet and behavior modification program, with routine medical follow-up.
  20. Patients receiving daily prescribed treatment with high dose aspirin (> 80mg daily), anti-inflammatory agents, anticoagulants or other gastric irritants.
  21. Patients who are unable or unwilling to take prescribed proton pump inhibitor medication
  22. Patients who are pregnant or breast-feeding.
  23. Subjects with Severe cardiopulmonary disease or other serious organic disease which might include known history of coronary artery disease, Myocardial infarction within the past 6 months, poorly-controlled hypertension, required use of NSAIDs
  24. Subjects taking medications on specified hourly intervals that may be affected by changes to gastric emptying, such as anti-seizure or anti-arrhythmic medications
  25. Subjects who are taking corticosteroids, immunosuppressants, and narcotics
  26. Subjects who are taking diet pills
  27. Symptomatic congestive heart failure, cardiac arrhythmia or unstable coronary artery disease.
  28. Pre-existing respiratory disease such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), pneumonia or cancer.
  29. Diagnosis of autoimmune connective tissue disorder (e.g. lupus, erythematous, scleroderma) or immunocompromised.
  30. Specific diagnosed genetic disorder such as Prader Willi syndrome.
  31. Eating disorders including night eating syndrome (NES), bulimia, binge eating disorder, or compulsive overeating
  32. Known history of endocrine disorders affecting weight such as uncontrolled hypothyroidism.

Sites / Locations

  • Orlando Health
  • University of Chicago
  • NorthShore University Health System
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital
  • Mayo Clinic in Rochester
  • Cornell University
  • Avera McKennan Hospital & University Health Center
  • University of Texas

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

Control Group: Lifestyle Modification

Treatment Group: Overstitch ESG Procedure

Crossover Group: Lifestyle Intervention to ESG Procedure

Arm Description

Participants randomized to the control group (lifestyle modification only) in Year 1 will undergo a standard moderate intensity life-style intervention during the first 12 months of participation.

Participants randomized to the treatment group will proceed to have the Overstitch Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (ESG) at the start of Year 1 and will undergo a standard moderate intensity life-style intervention during the first 12 months of participation. All patients undergoing ESG will go on a 6 weeks transitional diet.ESG patients will undergo a standard moderate intensity life-style intervention administered over 15 12 visits in the first year after ESG. ESG patients who have not achieved >25% EWL at the end of Year 1 will undergo a repeat upper endoscopy at 52 to 60 weeks to assess the durability of the plications. Patients will continue follow-up with a modified lifestyle intervention program administered over 6 visits in the second year

Control group participants (lifestyle modification only) who were compliant with at least 75% of visits in Year 1, have not achieved ≥25% EWL or have a BMI >30 measured at the week 52 visit, and have no new psychosocial contraindications as deemed by the treatment team to the procedure will cross over to receive the Overstitch ESG in Year 2, in addition to the standard moderate intensity lifestyle intervention program of 12 months.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Percentage of Excess Weight Loss (EWL)
Percentage of excess weight loss in participants at 12 months from randomization. Calculated as (weight loss/baseline excess weight) x 100, where weight loss is defined as follow-up weight minus the initial weight, and baseline excess weight is defined as index weight minus ideal weight X (X=25 kg/m²)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Number of Participants With ≥25% EWL
Total number of participants with ≥25% excess weight loss at 12 months from randomization
Number of Participants Off Or With Reduction in Antihypertensive Medications
Total number participants off or with reduction in antihypertensive medications
Change in Blood Pressure
Change in blood pressure measured in units of millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Change in Blood Pressure for ESG Intervention From Baseline to 24 Months
Change in blood pressure for participants that received ESG intervention measured in units of millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Number of Participants Off or With Reduction in Diabetes Medications
Total number of participants off or with reduction in diabetes medications
Change in HgbA1c
Change in HgbA1c levels
Change in HgbA1c for ESG Intervention From Baseline to 24 Months
Change in HgbA1c levels for participants that received the ESG intervention
Percentage of Total Body Weight Loss (TBWL)
Percentage of total body weight loss in participants
Number of Participants to Achieve ≥5% TBWL
Total number of participants to achieve ≥5% total body weight loss
Number of Participants to Achieve ≥10% TBWL
Total number of participants to achieve ≥10% total body weight loss
Esophagitis at Repeat Endoscopy
Total number of participants to have esophagitis at repeat endoscopy
Change in Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-Lite (IWQOL-Lite)
Changes in impact of weight on quality of life score assessed using self-reported IWQOL-lite questionnaire consisting of five domains: physical function (11 items, score range from 11-55 with higher scores indicating more negative outcome), self-esteem (7 items, score range from 7-35 with higher scores indicating more negative outcome), sexual life (4 items, score range from 4-20 with higher scores indicating more negative outcome), public distress (5 items, score range from 5-25 with higher scores indicating more negative outcome), and work (4 items, score range from 4-20 with higher scores indicating more negative outcome).
Changes in Health Status Survey Scores
Changes in subject's view of health assessed using self-reported SF-36 Health Status Survey consisting of 8 scaled scores: physical function (10-items, score range from 0-100 with higher scores indicating more positive outcome), role limitations due to physical health (4-items, score range from 0-100 with higher scores indicating more positive outcome), role limitations due to emotional problems (3-item, score range from 0-100 with higher scores indicating more positive outcome), energy/fatigue (4-items, score range from 0-100 with higher scores indicating more positive outcome), emotional well-being (5-items, score range from 0-100 with higher scores indicating more positive outcome), social functioning (2-items, score range from 0-100 with higher scores indicating more positive outcome), pain (2-items, score range from 0-100 with higher scores indicating more positive outcome), general health (5-items, score range from 0-100 with higher scores indicating more positive outcome)
Number of Participants With Major Depression or Severe Major Depression at Baseline
Number of participants to identify with major or severe major depression measured using the self-reported Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). The PHQ-9 is self-reported 9-item questionnaire to assess degree of depression severity with total score range from 0-27 categories were defined as followed: minimal, score < 10; major depression, 10 ≤ score < 20; severe major depression, x ≥ 20
Number of Participants With Major Depression or Severe Major Depression at 12 Months
Number of participants to identify with major or severe major depression measured using the self-reported Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). The PHQ-9 is self-reported 9-item questionnaire to assess degree of depression severity with total score range from 0-27 categories were defined as followed: minimal, score < 10; major depression, 10 ≤ score < 20; severe major depression, x ≥ 20
Change in Eating Behaviors
Change in eating behaviors evaluated using the self-reported Three Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ) consisting of 3 domains: cognitive restraint (6-items, score range from 0-100 with higher score indicating more restraint), uncontrolled eating (9-items, score range from 0-100 with lower score indicating more control), and emotional eating (3-items, score range 0-100 with higher score indicating eating with negative emotions)

Full Information

First Posted
January 16, 2018
Last Updated
September 24, 2022
Sponsor
Mayo Clinic
Collaborators
University of Texas, Johns Hopkins University, Brigham and Women's Hospital, NorthShore University HealthSystem, University of Chicago, Orlando Health, Inc., Cornell University, Avera McKennan Hospital & University Health Center
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03406975
Brief Title
Multicenter Endoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (ESG) Trial (MERIT Trial)
Official Title
Multi-center ESG Randomized Interventional Trial (MERIT-Trial)
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
September 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
December 20, 2017 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
October 29, 2020 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
October 15, 2021 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Mayo Clinic
Collaborators
University of Texas, Johns Hopkins University, Brigham and Women's Hospital, NorthShore University HealthSystem, University of Chicago, Orlando Health, Inc., Cornell University, Avera McKennan Hospital & University Health Center

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (ESG) is an endoscopic minimally invasive weight loss procedure where a commercially available, FDA approved, full-thickness endoscopic suturing device (Overstitch; Apollo Endosurgery, Austin, TX) is used to reduce the stomach volume by 80% through the creation of a restrictive endoscopic sleeve. This is accomplished by a series of endoscopically placed full-thickness sutures through the gastric wall, extending from the antrum to the gastroesophageal junction. Up to 200 participants at 9 locations in the United States will participate in this study. The ESG procedure has been performed clinically since 2013 in the United States. The investigators are completing this study to compare how effective the ESG is for achieving long-term weight loss when compared to lifestyle modification only, as well as to evaluate the long-term safety and durability of the procedure and its impact on quality of life. Results of this research may help support having this procedure covered by health insurance plans for future patients.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Obesity, Hypertension, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Other
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Crossover Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
208 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Control Group: Lifestyle Modification
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Participants randomized to the control group (lifestyle modification only) in Year 1 will undergo a standard moderate intensity life-style intervention during the first 12 months of participation.
Arm Title
Treatment Group: Overstitch ESG Procedure
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants randomized to the treatment group will proceed to have the Overstitch Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (ESG) at the start of Year 1 and will undergo a standard moderate intensity life-style intervention during the first 12 months of participation. All patients undergoing ESG will go on a 6 weeks transitional diet.ESG patients will undergo a standard moderate intensity life-style intervention administered over 15 12 visits in the first year after ESG. ESG patients who have not achieved >25% EWL at the end of Year 1 will undergo a repeat upper endoscopy at 52 to 60 weeks to assess the durability of the plications. Patients will continue follow-up with a modified lifestyle intervention program administered over 6 visits in the second year
Arm Title
Crossover Group: Lifestyle Intervention to ESG Procedure
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Control group participants (lifestyle modification only) who were compliant with at least 75% of visits in Year 1, have not achieved ≥25% EWL or have a BMI >30 measured at the week 52 visit, and have no new psychosocial contraindications as deemed by the treatment team to the procedure will cross over to receive the Overstitch ESG in Year 2, in addition to the standard moderate intensity lifestyle intervention program of 12 months.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Overstitch Endoscopic Suture System
Intervention Description
Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (ESG), an endoscopic minimally-invasive weight loss procedure, utilizing a suturing device to reduce the stomach volume by 80% through the creation of sleeve. This is accomplished by a series of endoscopically placed stitches through the stomach wall.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Lifestyle Intervention
Intervention Description
Standard low-calorie diet plan and moderate intensity life-style intervention of 150 minutes of aerobic exercise per week for 12 months.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of Excess Weight Loss (EWL)
Description
Percentage of excess weight loss in participants at 12 months from randomization. Calculated as (weight loss/baseline excess weight) x 100, where weight loss is defined as follow-up weight minus the initial weight, and baseline excess weight is defined as index weight minus ideal weight X (X=25 kg/m²)
Time Frame
12 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of Participants With ≥25% EWL
Description
Total number of participants with ≥25% excess weight loss at 12 months from randomization
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Number of Participants Off Or With Reduction in Antihypertensive Medications
Description
Total number participants off or with reduction in antihypertensive medications
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Change in Blood Pressure
Description
Change in blood pressure measured in units of millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Time Frame
Baseline, 12 months
Title
Change in Blood Pressure for ESG Intervention From Baseline to 24 Months
Description
Change in blood pressure for participants that received ESG intervention measured in units of millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Time Frame
Baseline, 24 months
Title
Number of Participants Off or With Reduction in Diabetes Medications
Description
Total number of participants off or with reduction in diabetes medications
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Change in HgbA1c
Description
Change in HgbA1c levels
Time Frame
Baseline, 12 months
Title
Change in HgbA1c for ESG Intervention From Baseline to 24 Months
Description
Change in HgbA1c levels for participants that received the ESG intervention
Time Frame
Baseline, 24 months
Title
Percentage of Total Body Weight Loss (TBWL)
Description
Percentage of total body weight loss in participants
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Number of Participants to Achieve ≥5% TBWL
Description
Total number of participants to achieve ≥5% total body weight loss
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Number of Participants to Achieve ≥10% TBWL
Description
Total number of participants to achieve ≥10% total body weight loss
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Esophagitis at Repeat Endoscopy
Description
Total number of participants to have esophagitis at repeat endoscopy
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Change in Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-Lite (IWQOL-Lite)
Description
Changes in impact of weight on quality of life score assessed using self-reported IWQOL-lite questionnaire consisting of five domains: physical function (11 items, score range from 11-55 with higher scores indicating more negative outcome), self-esteem (7 items, score range from 7-35 with higher scores indicating more negative outcome), sexual life (4 items, score range from 4-20 with higher scores indicating more negative outcome), public distress (5 items, score range from 5-25 with higher scores indicating more negative outcome), and work (4 items, score range from 4-20 with higher scores indicating more negative outcome).
Time Frame
Baseline, 12 months
Title
Changes in Health Status Survey Scores
Description
Changes in subject's view of health assessed using self-reported SF-36 Health Status Survey consisting of 8 scaled scores: physical function (10-items, score range from 0-100 with higher scores indicating more positive outcome), role limitations due to physical health (4-items, score range from 0-100 with higher scores indicating more positive outcome), role limitations due to emotional problems (3-item, score range from 0-100 with higher scores indicating more positive outcome), energy/fatigue (4-items, score range from 0-100 with higher scores indicating more positive outcome), emotional well-being (5-items, score range from 0-100 with higher scores indicating more positive outcome), social functioning (2-items, score range from 0-100 with higher scores indicating more positive outcome), pain (2-items, score range from 0-100 with higher scores indicating more positive outcome), general health (5-items, score range from 0-100 with higher scores indicating more positive outcome)
Time Frame
Baseline, 12 months
Title
Number of Participants With Major Depression or Severe Major Depression at Baseline
Description
Number of participants to identify with major or severe major depression measured using the self-reported Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). The PHQ-9 is self-reported 9-item questionnaire to assess degree of depression severity with total score range from 0-27 categories were defined as followed: minimal, score < 10; major depression, 10 ≤ score < 20; severe major depression, x ≥ 20
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Number of Participants With Major Depression or Severe Major Depression at 12 Months
Description
Number of participants to identify with major or severe major depression measured using the self-reported Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). The PHQ-9 is self-reported 9-item questionnaire to assess degree of depression severity with total score range from 0-27 categories were defined as followed: minimal, score < 10; major depression, 10 ≤ score < 20; severe major depression, x ≥ 20
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Change in Eating Behaviors
Description
Change in eating behaviors evaluated using the self-reported Three Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ) consisting of 3 domains: cognitive restraint (6-items, score range from 0-100 with higher score indicating more restraint), uncontrolled eating (9-items, score range from 0-100 with lower score indicating more control), and emotional eating (3-items, score range 0-100 with higher score indicating eating with negative emotions)
Time Frame
Baseline, 12 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
21 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
INCLUSION CRITERIA Age 21-65 BMI ≥ 30 and ≤40 kg/m² Willingness to comply with the substantial lifelong dietary restrictions required by the procedure History of failure with non-surgical weight-loss methods Willingness to follow protocol requirements, including signed informed consent, routine follow-up schedule, completing laboratory tests, and completing diet counseling Residing within a reasonable distance from the investigator's office and able to travel to the investigator to complete all routine follow- up visits Ability to give informed consent Women of childbearing potential (i.e., not post-menopausal or surgically sterilized) must agree to use adequate birth control methods ***There will be a quota for at least a) 50 patients with hypertension on one or more anti-hypertensive medication, b) 50 patients with type II diabetes mellitus on oral agents only with HgA1c ≤ 9, and thus the cohort of 200 patients will be stratified into three groups (Obesity, Obesity HTH, Obesity DM) and block randomized. No more than 50 participants without comorbidities will be enrolled in the trial. EXCLUSION CRITERIA History of foregut or gastrointestinal (GI) surgery (except uncomplicated cholecystectomy or appendectomy) Prior gastrointestinal surgery with sequelae, i.e. obstruction, and/or adhesive peritonitis or known abdominal adhesions. Prior open or laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Prior surgery of any kind on the esophagus, stomach or any type of hiatal hernia surgery. Any inflammatory disease of the gastrointestinal tract including esophagitis, Barrett's esophagus, gastric ulceration, duodenal ulceration, cancer or specific inflammation such as Crohn's disease. Potential upper gastrointestinal bleeding conditions such as esophageal or gastric varices, congenital or acquired intestinal telangiectasis, or other congenital anomalies of the gastrointestinal tract such as atresias or stenoses. A gastric mass or gastric polyps > 1 cm in size. A hiatal hernia > 4cm of axial displacement of the z-line above the diaphragm or severe or intractable gastro-esophageal reflux symptoms. A structural abnormality in the esophagus or pharynx such as a stricture or diverticulum that could impede passage of the endoscope. Achalasia or any other severe esophageal motility disorder Severe coagulopathy. Insulin-dependent diabetes (either Type 1 or Type 2) or a significant likelihood of requiring insulin treatment in the following 12 months or a HgbA1C >= 9. Subjects with any serious health condition unrelated to their weight that would increase the risk of endoscopy Chronic abdominal pain Motility disorders of the GI tract such as gross esophageal motility disorders, gastroparesis or intractable constipation Hepatic insufficiency or cirrhosis Use of an intragastric device prior to this study due to the increased thickness of the stomach wall preventing effective suturing. Active psychological issues preventing participation in a life-style modification program as determined by a psychologist Patients unwilling to participate in an established medically-supervised diet and behavior modification program, with routine medical follow-up. Patients receiving daily prescribed treatment with high dose aspirin (> 80mg daily), anti-inflammatory agents, anticoagulants or other gastric irritants. Patients who are unable or unwilling to take prescribed proton pump inhibitor medication Patients who are pregnant or breast-feeding. Subjects with Severe cardiopulmonary disease or other serious organic disease which might include known history of coronary artery disease, Myocardial infarction within the past 6 months, poorly-controlled hypertension, required use of NSAIDs Subjects taking medications on specified hourly intervals that may be affected by changes to gastric emptying, such as anti-seizure or anti-arrhythmic medications Subjects who are taking corticosteroids, immunosuppressants, and narcotics Subjects who are taking diet pills Symptomatic congestive heart failure, cardiac arrhythmia or unstable coronary artery disease. Pre-existing respiratory disease such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), pneumonia or cancer. Diagnosis of autoimmune connective tissue disorder (e.g. lupus, erythematous, scleroderma) or immunocompromised. Specific diagnosed genetic disorder such as Prader Willi syndrome. Eating disorders including night eating syndrome (NES), bulimia, binge eating disorder, or compulsive overeating Known history of endocrine disorders affecting weight such as uncontrolled hypothyroidism.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Barham K Abu Dayyeh
Organizational Affiliation
Mayo Clinic
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Orlando Health
City
Orlando
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32806
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Chicago
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60637
Country
United States
Facility Name
NorthShore University Health System
City
Evanston
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60201
Country
United States
Facility Name
Johns Hopkins University
City
Baltimore
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21224
Country
United States
Facility Name
Brigham and Women's Hospital
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02115
Country
United States
Facility Name
Mayo Clinic in Rochester
City
Rochester
State/Province
Minnesota
ZIP/Postal Code
55905
Country
United States
Facility Name
Cornell University
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10065
Country
United States
Facility Name
Avera McKennan Hospital & University Health Center
City
Sioux Falls
State/Province
South Dakota
ZIP/Postal Code
57105
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Texas
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77401
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
36241388
Citation
Vargas EJ, Rizk M, Gomez-Villa J, Edwards PK, Jaruvongvanich V, Storm AC, Acosta A, Lake D, Fidler J, Bharucha AE, Camilleri M, Abu Dayyeh BK. Effect of endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty on gastric emptying, motility and hormones: a comparative prospective study. Gut. 2023 Jun;72(6):1073-1080. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2022-327816. Epub 2022 Oct 14.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
35908555
Citation
Abu Dayyeh BK, Bazerbachi F, Vargas EJ, Sharaiha RZ, Thompson CC, Thaemert BC, Teixeira AF, Chapman CG, Kumbhari V, Ujiki MB, Ahrens J, Day C; MERIT Study Group; Galvao Neto M, Zundel N, Wilson EB. Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty for treatment of class 1 and 2 obesity (MERIT): a prospective, multicentre, randomised trial. Lancet. 2022 Aug 6;400(10350):441-451. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01280-6. Epub 2022 Jul 28.
Results Reference
derived
Links:
URL
https://www.mayo.edu/research/clinical-trials
Description
Mayo Clinic Clinical Trials

Learn more about this trial

Multicenter Endoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (ESG) Trial (MERIT Trial)

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs