CONFIDENCE Financial Education for Caregivers (CONFIDENCE)

Monthly out-of-pocket costs of caregiving is based on the tool used by the AARP Public Policy Institute in their 2016 report on the out-of-pocket costs of caregiving (Rainville et al., 2016). This measure combines caregiver recall of care costs in the previous month, collected at baseline, with 5 days of daily spending diaries. Daily surveys will be sent using an email with a survey link, and a text message reminder. Monthly costs include less-frequent, high-cost expenditures (e.g., mortgage payment), while daily costs include lower-cost items caregivers may pay for more frequently (e.g., groceries). Daily self-reports of spending will be averaged and multiplied by 6 to approximate the number of days in a month, and added to estimated monthly costs.

The measure for psychological financial strain is from multiple scales. Items 1 to 11 ask about financial anxiety and is based on the 10-item scale from Shapiro & Burchell (2012). The investigators added an item based on another related to caregiving (i.e., "I find planning for my caregiving expenses to be unpleasant"). Items 12 to 14 are based on those used by Novilitis et al., (2003), and address additional components of financial anxiety than those items introduced by Shapiro (e.g., arguments with others; alpha=0.74). Lastly, the investigators included the 1-item question from Shim et al. (2010) that asks about financial worry ("I worry constantly about money"; CFA factor loading was 0.79 for this item). Participants are asked to indicate the extent to which each statement is true (Very true [3], Somewhat true[2], Somewhat untrue[1], and Complete untrue[0]). Scores are summed such that scores range from 0 to 45, where higher scores indicate higher levels of financial strain.

Self-efficacy is measured using the Caregiver Self-Efficacy Scale (Ritter et al., In Press). This 8-item scale asks about multiples domains of self-efficacy (e.g., managing behavioral symptoms, accessing respite, and controlling upsetting thoughts). It demonstrates high reliability (alpha=0.89) and good test-retest reliability (0.73). Participants rate the extent to which they are "Not confident at all" (1) to "Totally confident" (10). Scores range from 8 (lowest level of self-efficacy) to 80 (highest level of self-efficacy). The outcome measure will use the average change score from baseline scores.

Resourcefulness is measured using the 28-item Caregiver Resourcefulness Scale (alpha=0.85; Zauszniewski, 2006). This scale has two factors: one focused on help-seeking and another on self-help. Caregivers are asked the frequency at which they use different strategies to manage challenges, and may respond: Not at all like me (0), Pretty much not like me (1), A little bit not like me (2), A little bit like me (3), Pretty much like much like me (4), or Very much like me (5). Items are added together to create a total score. Scores range from 0 to 140, where higher scores indicate higher levels of resourcefulness. The outcome measure will use the average change score from baseline scores