search
Back to results

Spinal Cord Stimulation for Pain Relief in Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Primary Purpose

Irritable Bowel Syndrome, Constipation, Diarrhea

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 1
Locations
Sweden
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Spinal Cord Stimultion (SCS)
Spinal cord nerve stimulation
Sponsored by
Uppsala University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Irritable Bowel Syndrome focused on measuring Spinal cord stimulation, Irritable bowel syndrome, Abdominal pain, Diarrhea

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 60 Years (Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age 18-60, Rome II criteria, abdominal pain >4 (0-10 VAS), stable symptoms for >2 years

Exclusion Criteria:

  • other gastrointestinal disease, somatic or psychiatric co-morbidity

Sites / Locations

  • Karolinska University Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Other

Other

Arm Label

Early off-stimulation (group B)

Early on-stimulation (group A)

Arm Description

Late SCS treatment. After 2 weeks without SCS, randomization to either of two study arms: Group B starting with no SCS for a period of six weeks (A) followed by a period of active SCS (on-period for 6 weeks). Thereafter, free stimulation for 12 weeks, followed by a concluding 2 sweeks of no SCS.

Early SCS treatment. After 2 weeks without SCS, randomization to either of two study arms: Group A starting with SCS for a period of six weeks (A) followed by a period of no SCS (off-period for 6 weeks). Thereafter, free stimulation for 12 weeks, followed by a concluding 2 sweeks of no SCS.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

To investigate if typical abdominal pain of IBS can be ameliorated by SCS?
During the whole study period each patient will record the number of pain attacks. Patients are scheduled for regular outpatient controls, at 2, 8, 14, 26 and 28 weeks after implantation

Secondary Outcome Measures

To record effects of SCS on diarrhea/constipation
During the whole study period each patient recorded, on a daily basis: 1) number of pain attacks, 2) number of diarrhea episodes, 3) average pain level for the day and 4) assessment of average quality of life. For the latter two items patients were instructed to use a numerical rating scale (NRS) with a range of 0-10. Patients were scheduled for regular outpatient controls, at 2, 8, 14, 26 and 28 weeks after implantation

Full Information

First Posted
October 30, 2012
Last Updated
November 5, 2018
Sponsor
Uppsala University
Collaborators
Medtronics, Inc., Bengt Ihre Foundation, The Swedish Society of Medicine
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01726751
Brief Title
Spinal Cord Stimulation for Pain Relief in Irritable Bowel Syndrome
Official Title
Spinal Cord Stimulation in the Irritable Bowel Syndrome - a Randomized Cross-over Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
November 2018
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
August 2005 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
April 2014 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
April 2014 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Uppsala University
Collaborators
Medtronics, Inc., Bengt Ihre Foundation, The Swedish Society of Medicine

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
To elucidate Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) as treatment for IBS. An SCS system with a 4-polar electrode at the T5-8 level is implanted. In a randomized, cross-over study design, active stimulation is compared to a period without stimulation, with an ensuing tailing stimulation period, twice as long. Patients recorded average pain level, pain attacks, number of diarrheas and global quality of life. At the end of the study patients can choose to retain their SCS stimulation system or have it removed. The outcome of the present trial will show whether SCS is a useful treatment of IBS. The long-term follow-up will show the continuous amelioration of SCS over at least six months.
Detailed Description
The primary aim of the study is to investigate if the typical chronic abdominal pain in IBS can be ameliorated by SCS. Secondary aims are possible effects of SCS on diarrhea or constipation, quality of life and side effects, and further to evaluate the feasibility and tolerability of SCS as validated by the willingness of the patients to retain the SCS stimulation equipment. Eligible patients are selected by a gastroenterologist for the study inclusion criteria: age 18-60, fulfilment of Rome II criteria, abdominal pain episodically reaching > 4 on a 0-10 VAS, and stable symptoms for the past 2 years. A thorough clinical work-up is done to exclude organic disease, including routine blood and electrolyte status, hepatic enzyme function and lactose tolerance test as well as colonoscopy or colon x-ray. Patients with significant somatic or psychiatric co-morbidity will be excluded. Study design: A quadripolar SCS-lead (Quad-plus®, Medtronic Inc., Minnesota, USA) was implanted via a percutaneous puncture at the Th11/12 level of the dorsal epidural space in local anesthesia with the patient in the prone position. The electrode is advanced to the mid-thoracic level, aiming for a final position around T6-T8, until intraoperative stimulation yields paresthesias covering the abdomen . The electrode is then connected to an impulse generator (Itrel-3®, Medtronic Inc.) implanted subcutaneously in the upper left quadrant of the abdomen. Stimulation frequency will be set to 50 Hz for all patients but other parameters (electrode pole combinations, amplitudes and pulse width) are adjusted and set to produce adequate paresthesias of comfortable intensity. During the subsequent ongoing trial reprogramming was allowed, if necessary for optimal stimulation. SCS will be started 2 weeks after surgery. Thereafter patients are randomized to either of two study arms: one starting with SCS for a period of six weeks (A), and another with six weeks without SCS (delayed start) (B). When on active SCS, patients are prompted to stimulate 8-12 h per day. Patients are instructed to increase the stimulation upon pain attack break-through. After six weeks, patients without stimulation were crossed-over to stimulation and vice versa. After another six weeks both study arms included continued stimulation for additional 12 weeks up to 26 weeks. After a final 2-week period without stimulation the trial is terminated. During the whole study period patients will record, on a daily basis: 1) number of pain attacks, 2) number of diarrhea episodes, 3) average pain level for the day (0-10) and 4) average quality of life (0-10). Patients are scheduled for regular controls, at 2, 8, 14, 26 and 28 weeks after implantation. Patient compliance will be ensured, as the impulse generator stores information on the percentage of elapsed time that stimulation has been in use. At termination of the study participants were offered to keep the implanted SCS system or have it removed. All patients will be contacted for a structured telephone interview follow-up at a time-point varying between 18 to 78 months after the study termination. A questionnaire was used to assess present pain level, medication, use of the SCS system, side effects and global satisfaction. Patients will also be asked whether they would have participated if they had known the outcome in advance, and if they would recommend a trial of SCS treatment to someone else with similar gastrointestinal problems. All patients will be evaluated with the hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS) and a modified version of the gastrointestinal symptom rating scale for IBS (GSRS-IBS).

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Irritable Bowel Syndrome, Constipation, Diarrhea, Pain
Keywords
Spinal cord stimulation, Irritable bowel syndrome, Abdominal pain, Diarrhea

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 1, Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Crossover Assignment
Model Description
Spinal cord stimulation
Masking
Participant
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
10 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Early off-stimulation (group B)
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
Late SCS treatment. After 2 weeks without SCS, randomization to either of two study arms: Group B starting with no SCS for a period of six weeks (A) followed by a period of active SCS (on-period for 6 weeks). Thereafter, free stimulation for 12 weeks, followed by a concluding 2 sweeks of no SCS.
Arm Title
Early on-stimulation (group A)
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
Early SCS treatment. After 2 weeks without SCS, randomization to either of two study arms: Group A starting with SCS for a period of six weeks (A) followed by a period of no SCS (off-period for 6 weeks). Thereafter, free stimulation for 12 weeks, followed by a concluding 2 sweeks of no SCS.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Spinal Cord Stimultion (SCS)
Other Intervention Name(s)
Quad-plus®, Medtronic Inc., MN, USA
Intervention Description
Electric stimulation of the spinal cord
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Spinal cord nerve stimulation
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
To investigate if typical abdominal pain of IBS can be ameliorated by SCS?
Description
During the whole study period each patient will record the number of pain attacks. Patients are scheduled for regular outpatient controls, at 2, 8, 14, 26 and 28 weeks after implantation
Time Frame
According to protocol for 26 weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
To record effects of SCS on diarrhea/constipation
Description
During the whole study period each patient recorded, on a daily basis: 1) number of pain attacks, 2) number of diarrhea episodes, 3) average pain level for the day and 4) assessment of average quality of life. For the latter two items patients were instructed to use a numerical rating scale (NRS) with a range of 0-10. Patients were scheduled for regular outpatient controls, at 2, 8, 14, 26 and 28 weeks after implantation
Time Frame
According to protocol for 26 weeks
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
To evaluate quality of life and side effects, feasibility and tolerability of SCS, validated as willingness to retain the stimulation equipment.
Description
During the whole study period each patient recorded, on a daily basis: 1) number of pain attacks, 2) number of diarrhea episodes, 3) average pain level for the day and 4) assessment of average quality of life. For the latter two items patients were instructed to use a numerical rating scale (NRS) with a range of 0-10. Patients were scheduled for regular outpatient controls, at 2, 8, 14, 26 and 28 weeks after implantation.
Time Frame
According to protocol for 26 weeks

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
60 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: age 18-60, Rome II criteria, abdominal pain >4 (0-10 VAS), stable symptoms for >2 years Exclusion Criteria: other gastrointestinal disease, somatic or psychiatric co-morbidity
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Per M Hellström, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Uppsala University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Karolinska University Hospital
City
Solna
State/Province
Stockholm
ZIP/Postal Code
17176
Country
Sweden

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
34854473
Citation
O'Connell NE, Ferraro MC, Gibson W, Rice AS, Vase L, Coyle D, Eccleston C. Implanted spinal neuromodulation interventions for chronic pain in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Dec 2;12(12):CD013756. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013756.pub2.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Spinal Cord Stimulation for Pain Relief in Irritable Bowel Syndrome

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs