Active clinical trials for "Abscess"

Establish the repertoire of bacteria and Archaea responsible for brain abscesses. Correlate the microbial repertoire to epidemiological, clinical and radiological data; to define the different nosological entities falling within the framework of cerebral abscesses.

The goal of this observational study is tolearn the association of gut microflora with the onset of perianal abscesses. The main questions it aims to answer are: Question 1: To understand the structure of rectal microbial community composition and its relationship with pathogenic bacteria in patients with perianal abscess. Question 2: Understand the structure of rectal microbial community composition in healthy people. Participants will be collected with rectal secretions and stool specimens.In addition, patients with perianal abscess should also collect pus samples.

This study aims to look at the necessity for prescribing antibiotics post-drainage of peritonsillar abscesses (PTA). This will be a single-blinded randomized-control trial with two arms - patients receiving placebo versus those receiving a seven day course of oral Amoxicillin-Clavulanic acid. The main objective measure will be to assess if there is resolution of the peri-tonsillar abscess and there has been no reaccumulation. Patients will be blinded to whether they receive placebo or amoxicillin-clavulanic acid. Patients will be phoned after 7 days to assess if their symptoms have resolved via an over the phone questionnaire. Anaerobic and aerobic cultures will be obtained.

This study expands upon pilot data for feasibility since May 2011. The study aims to evaluate the effect of rapid test availability on use of targeted spectrum antibiotics for non-MRSA abscesses in ambulatory patients in the Emergency Department (ED). The multi-institutional study will assess the feasibility of providing the GeneXpert® MRSA/SA SSTI assay to the ED and evaluate the impact of delivering the test result to clinicians in real-time on patient management decisions regarding the use of antimicrobial agents. Patients are randomized to standard culture (control arm) or to the GeneXpert® assay plus standard culture.

The purpose of the study is to find the dose of rapidly administered ketamine in 3 different pediatric age groups (2-5, 6-11 and 12-17) for abscess drainage and fracture reduction. Ketamine is the most common drug administered to children to facilitate painful procedures in the emergency setting because it achieves potent sedation, pain relief and amnesia with minimal adverse cardiopulmonary effects.(1-5) However, the 1-2 hour recovery period (1,6) associated with standard ketamine administration guidelines(7) strains work flow because it requires bedside one-on-one nurse monitoring in a treatment room, tying up these limited and valuable resources. Consequently, a combination of two other drugs, propofol + fentanyl (P/F), with recovery of 20-30 minutes, is rapidly gaining popularity for procedural sedation despite more frequent respiratory depression, apnea and hypotension caused by this technique.(2,4,8,9) The investigators believe recovery associated with our novel method for administering ketamine is significantly shorter than with the standard larger dose more slowly administered ketamine technique(7). Through the investigators clinical experience, the investigators have found rapid infusion of smaller than standard doses of ketamine safely achieves the drug's sedative effect, with the benefit of more rapid recovery due to the use of a smaller dose. However, this novel technique challenges published beliefs that time of recovery from ketamine sedation does not differ significantly with the dose administered, within the usual dose ranges, and that rapid infusion may cause respiratory depression, similar to that seen with other classes of sedative-analgesic drugs.(7,10) the investigators believe the slow infusion recommended by standard guidelines(7) requires a larger ketamine dose necessary to achieve effective sedation, and, consequently, prolongs recovery. It is the prolonged recovery that has prompted increased use of other less safe but briefer sedatives, such as propofol/fentanyl. By demonstrating patients recover rapidly with new ketamine technique, without increased adverse cardiopulmonary effects, the investigators will provide clinicians with an important new method for ketamine procedural sedation. The investigators believe clinicians will prefer more rapid recovery ketamine technique because it is safer and reduces pain and distress better than the propofol/fentanyl combination for sedation. The investigators complete proposal requires two steps. In Step One, this proposal, the investigators will determine the minimum effective dose of rapidly infused ketamine that achieves deep sedation for at least 5 minutes in 95% of children (ED95). Two groups of patients will be studied: one group is patients undergoing abscess incision and drainage and the other group is patients undergoing fracture reduction in our Emergency Department. The investigators believe that the ED95 is different for both the groups as the severity of pain is different. The investigators will compare the safety and recovery times to published standard ketamine techniques. In the following study, Step Two, the investigators will compare this novel technique, in a blinded randomized trial using the ED95 ketamine dose determined in Step One to the standard ketamine technique to determine if the novel technique results in significantly shorter recovery without an increase in the frequency of adverse effects. The study the investigators are proposing in this submission is Step One only.

Characterization of the safety profile of TR-701 Free Acid (FA) in patients with major cutaneous abscess or cellulitis/erysipelas.

Penetration of cefpirome and moxifloaxacin into abscess fluid of humans will be tested. Patients with an abscess scheduled for drainage will receive study drugs (single or multiple dose), pus samples and plasma samples will be collected and analyzed by High pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC). Pharmacokinetics of the study drugs in pus and plasma will be determined using a pharmacokinetic model.

The treatment of the acute phase of the complicated abscess tubo-ovarian relies on antibiotics more or less associated with surgical management in case of visible abscess, poor clinical tolerance (sepsis) and resistance to medical treatment. The CNGOF recommended in 2012 that the tubo-ovarian abscess are not within one antibiotic, and should be drained by interventional radiology, preferably by transvaginal or laparoscopic. Furthermore the efficiency of drainage by ultrasound puncture performed vaginally was demonstrated. This approach tends to replace the first laparoscopy because of its less invasive, fast, easy to access, more acceptable and less cost compared to laparoscopy. This approach is recommended by the French and English colleges. In total, the surgery in case of ATO is necessary, it is always coupled with antibiotics. Several surgical approaches are possible, laparotomy, laparoscopy and ultrasound-guided puncture. No prospective comparative study has been done, for which we want to develop this study.

In this research study, a device called the Derma-Stent will be tested. The sponsor of the study, Mar-Med Company, will supply the device. This device is used to drain a cutaneous abscess, which is a skin infection that results in buildup of pus under the skin. Currently, the normal treatment for this abscess is to cut and drain and the wound, and later pack the wound with gauze. Packing is done to prevent the pus to accumulate again. But regular gauze is difficult for patient to remove themselves, so another visit to the doctor is usually necessary. The Derma-Stent device will be tested to see how easily patients can remove this by themselves and if it is less painful and more effective than normal gauze packing.

Liver abscess is purulent collections in the liver parenchyma that result from microbial infection spread to the liver through the biliary tree, hepatic or portal vein and by extension of adjacent infection or as a result of trauma. Liver abscesses are most commonly pyogenic followed by amoebic and rarely tuberculous or fungal in immunocompromised patients. In the developing country amoebic liver abscess is more frequent than the developed country but secondary bacterial infection of amoebic liver abscess and polymicrobial pyogenic liver abscess are also common. Pyogenic liver abscess is commonly a polymicrobial infection caused by mixed enteric facultative and anaerobic pathogens. The most commonly isolated organisms are Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Streptococcus constellatus, Streptococcus anginosus, Streptococcus intermedius, Enterococcus and anaerobes, including Bacteroidesfragilis and Fusobacteriumnecrophorum. Amoebic liver abscess most frequently occur following infection with the parasite Entamoeba histolytica. Liver abscess is a common medical emergency. Prompt empirical antimicrobial with or without percutaneous aspiration or drainage of the abscess is therapeutic. An empiric antimicrobial regimen for liver abscess should cover enteric gram-negative bacilli, streptococci, anaerobes and antamoebahistolytica. Presently a Fluoroquinolone (Ciprofloxacin, Levofloxacin) or a Third or Fourth generation Cefalosporine (Cefixime, Ceftriaxone, cefepime) or a Beta-lactam-beta-lactamase inhibitor combination (piperacillin-tazobactam or ticarcillin-clavulanate) or a Carbapenem (Imipenem-cilastatin, Meropenem, Doripenem, Ertapenem) are being used in combination with or without Metronidazole as the empirical antimicrobial regime for the treatment live abscess. There is no randomized controlled clinical trial to evaluated and compare efficacy of the antimicrobial regimens for the treatment of liver abscess as well as there is no specific treatment guideline for the use of empirical antibiotics. There is also no definite proven rational for using Cefalosporine, Beta-lactam-beta-lactamase inhibitor combination or Carbapenem upfront, not using Fluoroquinolone in empirical antibiotic regimen for the treatment of liver abscess. Injudicious use of broader spectrum antibiotics may also lead to rise in antibiotic resistance in future. Both ciprofloxacin and Cefixime are effective oral antibiotics as they are well-absorbed orally with good oral bioavailability and achieve plasma concentration well above the minimal inhibitory concentrations require for the killing of the microorganism. Using intravenous (IV) antibiotics upfront, for the treatment of liver abscess in patients who can take orally may unnecessary increase the duration of hospital stay, healthcare burden and the cost of therapy, as well as the risk of hospital acquired infection. So the investigators have planned this randomized controlled double blind study to evaluate the efficacy of empirical Ciprofloxacin plus Metronidazole and Cefixime plus Metronidazole therapy for the treatment of liver abscess and to compare the outcomes of two different empirical antibiotics regimen.