Active clinical trials for "Acute Kidney Injury"

Fluid resuscitation remains the cornerstone for the care of severe trauma patients to compensate for blood loss, to compensate for capillary leak induced by systemic inflammation but also to prevent the detrimental consequences of traumatic rhabdomyolysis. Isotonic saline (NaCl 0.9%), called "physiological serum" is the standard fluid for the resuscitation of severely injured patients. However, the formulation of NaCl 0.9% is not really physiological since its chloride concentration is 1.5 higher than the one of human plasma. This excessive chloride concentration leads to hyperchloremic acidosis and to a drop in renal perfusion after isotonic saline infusion. For this reason, we wonder whether fluid resuscitation with Plasmalyte would be beneficial for renal function of trauma patients in comparison with NaCl 0.9%. Our research question is: In a population of trauma patients at high risk of acute kidney injury, does a fluid resuscitation with Plasmalyte Viaflo lower the incidence of severe acute kidney injury (stage 2 or 3 according to the KDIGO classification) compared with a resuscitation with isotonic saline (NaCl 0.9%)?

Intermittent hemodialysis/diafiltration is a current renal replacement therapy (RRT) institued for ICU patients with AKI. For a better clinical tolerance, iinternational guidelines advise to use cold dialysate, increase duration session, decrease blood and dialysate flows, and increase level of sodium dialysate concentration (≥ 145mmol/l). Indeed, the use of a Na concentration dialysate > 145 mmol/l improves intradialytic hemodynamic tolerance but it may also induce fluid overload by the transfert of sodium from the dialysate compartment to the blood. Yet, fluid overload has been strongly associated with mortality in critically ills. The investigators hypothesized that the use of a level in sodium dialysate at 140 mmol/l with slow low efficiency daily dialysis-filtration (SLEDD-f) will permit a fair intradialytic hemodynamic tolerance without the adverse effect of intradiaclytic Na loading from the dialysate. Two randomized groups of ICU AKI patients treated by SLEDD-f will be compared in terms of intradialytic hemodynamic tolerance and overload accordong to 140 or 145 mmol/l of Na in the dialysate

Postoperative Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) is a common complication after heart transplantation (HTX) affecting outcome of patients. Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) is an intervention that showed positive effect on incidence of AKI in elective cardiac surgery. Effects of RIPC on AKI in HTX patients have not been investigated to date. Recently new biomarkers have been established, showing high sensitivity and specificity for AKI. Especially, Insulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Protein 7 (IGFBP7) together with Tissue Inhibitor of Metalloproteinases-2 (TIMP-2), known as nephrocheck®, are diagnostic biomarkers in this context. Hence, the investigators want to conduct a randomized controlled feasibility and proof of concept trial to determine the effects of RIPC on AKI after HTX, defined/detected using postoperative urinary [TIMP-2]*[IGFBP-7] concentration.

The goal of this RCT is to compare the effectiveness of aminophylline and furosemide combination vs furosemide alone in producing effective diuresis in critically ill adults in ICU. ICU patients with the need of improved diuresis will be recruited and given either infusion of aminophylline and furosemide combination or furosemide alone, and their hourly urine output will be monitored to compare their effectiveness.

The purpose of this study is to characterize the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) profile and to evaluate the safety and tolerability of TIN816 in hospitalized adult participants in an intensive care setting with a diagnosis of sepsis-associated acute kidney injury (SA-AKI).

This is a randomized, multi-centric, placebo-controlled, participant and investigator-blinded study to evaluate the safety, tolerability and efficacy of TIN816 in adult patients at risk for acute kidney injury following cardiac surgery.

The study compares the effectiveness and safety of TIPS implantation in patients with HRS-AKI (stage 2 and 3) and liver cirrhosis with standard therapy (drug therapy with terlipressin + albumin).

Traditional HD therapy is very effective in clearing urea and smaller middle molecules, but is limited in clearing larger middle molecules. These accumulated large middle-molecular-weight uremic toxins may cause and aggravate inflammation, atherosclerosis and calcification, which indirectly lead to the death of patients. Studies have shown that, compared to conventional high-flux HD (HF-HD), HDF that combines diffusion and convection can reduce the all-cause mortality. Compared to the conventional HF-HD, HDF can more effectively clear larger molecular toxins in one session, which may be related to the better clearance effect of HDF on middle-molecular-weight toxins Theranova's innovative Medium Cut-Off® membranes has high permeability and selectivity to uremic toxins (clearance of a molecular weight of up to 45 kDa) and can retain essential proteins, to maintain patient's albumin level during the HD treatment[9]. Its unique membrane and high cut-off characteristics expand the clearance range beyond those of flux membrane dialyzers. Theranova 400 can be widely used in most blood purification centers under conventional HD equipment and treatment modes, with the effect similar to HDF This study is to demonstrate non-inferiority of the Theranova 400 Dialyzer in hemodialysis (HD) mode (hereinafter referred to as Theranova 400) compared to hemodiafiltration (HDF), using FX 800 in HDF mode (hereinafter referred to as FX 800).

The purpose of this study is to assess the effectiveness and the safety of extracorporeal methods for removing mediators of systemic inflammation in patients with multiple organ dysfunction syndrome after heart and aorta surgery.

The patients discharged from intensive care units (ICU) have a high incidence of cardiovascular events and mortality rate during the year following ICU discharge. Among patients admitted to the ICU, patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) display high risk of such events. The investigators furthermore demonstrated that AKI could induce remote cardio-vascular injury and fibrosis, which may be involved in the poor prognosis of AKI. Strategies that may prevent the cardiovascular consequences of AKI in most severe patients (i.e. post-AKI ICU survivors) may therefore improve long term outcomes. AKI has been associated with activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS). Activation of the RAAS has been further associated with long-term health consequences especially with cardiovascular damages. Potential protective effects of RAASi following acute injury have been reported in observational studies. With this randomized controlled trial, the investigators aim at investigating the impact of treatment with RAAS inhibitors after AKI on cardiovascular and kidney outcomes.