Active clinical trials for "Ankle Fractures"

Treatment of syndesmotic injury with Weber C fracture. A randomized study comparing ZipTight suture endobutton and one tricortical 3,5 mm syndesmotic screw.

The use of Toradol for pain control in surgical orthopedic cases is currently a topic of interest within the field. The proposed study is a prospective randomized study evaluating postoperative pain, opioid requirement, complication/reoperation rates and nonunion rates in patients undergoing surgical treatment for isolated lateral malleolar fibula fractures. Patients will be randomized to either the Treatment Group (Toradol) or the Control Group (Non-Toradol). Both Toradol and non-Toradol drug regimens are currently prescribed by the Foot and Ankle Team at the Rothman Institute and this study will serve as a valuable comparison.

The purpose of the study is to compare functional outcomes and recovery following surgical and non surgical treatment of potentially unstable , isolated fibula fractures. Secondary objectives are to compare the re-operation rate, time to union and complications between the two treatment groups. The primary research questions: Does surgery provide a better functional outcome compared to non operative treatment of undisplaced, unstable fractures? Do patients with these fractures return to activities faster after operative or non operative treatment? Are complications more common with operative or non operative care?

This is an evaluation of the functionality and added value of cork splint materials instead of a plaster splint for children (3-11 years old).

The purpose of this study is to determine if use of new imaging technology termed "3D fluoroscopy" will lead the surgeon to change the position of the fractured bones to a more accurate position.

Medial malleolus: Operative Or Non-operative (MOON study) Ankle fractures are a common Orthopaedic trauma presentation, accounting for approximately 10% of the workload. There has been debate regarding the significance of the contribution of the medial malleolus to ankle stability. Some deem the lateral malleolus as the key stabiliser. With this anatomically aligned the ankle joint should be stable. Operating on the medial malleolus fracture often requires a second generous skin incision, soft tissue stripping and insertion of metalwork. This carries with it the risk of wound complications, infection and increased operation time. High risk patients including the elderly, diabetics and those with significant swelling following injury are particularly vulnerable. The study will include adult patients (≥16 years) with capacity to consent and complete post-operative questionnaires, presenting to a single Orthopaedic trauma unit. Participants will be randomised to fixation or non-fixation of associated medial malleolus fractures at the same time as fixation of the lateral malleolar fracture to assess if this impacts on validated patient outcomes, failure, operative time and complications over a one-year follow-up. Only one trial has been published, showing no significant difference between failure rates or outcomes, but reduced operative time. Participants will be enrolled into the trial following informed consent. The final decision on whether a participant is eligible can only be made during surgery when the medial malleolus fracture has reduced with no more than 2mm displacement. If this is confirmed the participant will be randomised to receive either fixation or non-fixation of the medial malleolus. Randomisation therefore occurs at the time of surgery. Participants will be reviewed at set post-operative checkpoints, with X-rays and patient reported outcome scores. Trial data will hopefully enable surgeons to make better informed decisions when managing patients with ankle fracture dislocations.

The aim of our study is to compare two different syndesmosis transfixation methods in AO/OTA Weber C ankle fractures. Our hypothesis is that 50% of screw fixed fibulas but only 5% of suture-button fixed fibulas are in malposition. All skeletally mature patients (16 years or older) with AO/OTA Weber C type fractures operated within a week after trauma are consecutively included into the study. The tibiofibular transfixation is randomly performed either by a 3,5 mm tricortical screw or a suture-button (TightRope). Malposition of the tibiofibular joint is assessed in an intraoperative computed tomography. Clinical outcome is assessed by using Olerud-Molander, RAND ja 36-Item Healt Survey after 1-year from the injury.

The primary objective of this study will be to evaluate the functional outcome of patients who present with a distal fibula fracture who were treated with either intermedullary nail (IMN) fixation or plate fixation.

This pilot study will test the hypothesis that prolonged regional peripheral nerve block will reduce development of chronic pain in patients undergoing surgery for ankle fracture compared to standard of care. Subjects will be followed for one year.

Co-administration of the sciatic nerve block and femoral nerve block may provide anesthesia and analgesia in patients undergoing lower extremity surgery. Several approaches to sciatic nerve block have been described. The anterior and posterior approaches are two of the approaches used to make the sciatic nerve block. In our study, n = 20 patients for Group A and n = 25 patients for Group P were included. Then, sciatic nerve block and femoral nerve block were performed to each patient by using anterior or posterior approach randomly. After the block is performed, the sensory and motor block start and end times, the first intraoperative fentanyl requirement time and total amount of fentanyl required, the first Diclofenac sodium requirement time, and the total amount of diclofenac sodium that patients required were determined. As the groups were compared to each other; the time to start sensory block was statistically significantly lower, the first fentanyl requirement time was statistically significantly earlier and the total amount of fentanyl required was statistically significantly lower in Group P. Patient satisfaction, anesthesia quality and surgical quality were statistically significantly higher in Group P. In this study, the investigators concluded that if a patient does not have pain secondary to fracture, posterior approach to sciatic nerve block can be performed, whereas, if a patient has pain secondary to fracture, anterior approach to sciatic nerve block can be performed in order to avoid repositioning.