Active clinical trials for "Sleep Apnea, Obstructive"

Prospective, randomized, blinded, cross-over study assessing the effectiveness of adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV) in treating patients who have obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) complicated by central sleep apnea (CSA) due to the chronic use of opioid medications

Treatment response of mild obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy and oral appliance (OA) is still controversial. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of CPAP and OA treatment on: objective and subjective sleepiness, cognitive deficits, mood changes, quality of life, inflammatory profile and metabolic cardiovascular and hormonal alterations in mild OSA subjects. Subjects with mild OSA (apnea -hypopnea index of 5 or more events per hour of sleep and less than 15), both genders, body mass index lower than 35Kg/m2 and age between 18 to 65 years will be included. They also must have a minimum mandibular protrusion of 7mm. Subjects will be randomly distributed in three groups: group 1 with CPAP, group 2 with OA and group 3 will be the control. At baseline evaluation, six months, one year and three years, all subjects will be submitted to sleep questionnaires, physical examination, ear-nose and throat evaluation, baseline polysomnography (and with CPAP for groups 1), Epworth Sleepiness Scale, Karolinska Sleepiness Scale, Stanford Sleepiness Scale, Maintenance of Wakefulness Test, Chalder Fatigue Scale, Neurocognitive testing, Beck Inventories of anxiety and depression, Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ), WHOQOL-BREF quality of life questionnaire, Short Form-36 quality of life questionnaire, questionnaire for sexual dysfunction, blood analysis for inflammatory, metabolic and hormonal evaluation, assessment of heart rate variability, 24 hour blood pressure monitoring and endothelial dysfunction. Sleep hygiene care was offer to three groups. Analysis mean and standard deviation will be used for descriptive statistical and a general linear model will be applied for analysis within groups on different time.

This study will look at an alternative new pathway for diagnosis and treatment based on simple procedures in the patient's own home compared with the current conventional laboratory based pathway. The purpose is to determine whether all patients with OSA require the more elaborate laboratory procedures, or whether a subgroup can be managed more simply.

This study will determine if mirtazapine, a unique antidepressant that does not disturb sleep, will improve obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The design is randomized, crossover, double blind, and placebo controlled. On two consecutive nights of one week, the patients receive either 30 mg mirtazapine or placebo at bedtime. The following week, the alternative medication is administered. The patients have known mild to moderate sleep apnea. The endpoints of the study are the apnea + hypopnea index (AHI), sleep quality, and the degree of arterial oxygen desaturation.

The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of treatment with PROVIGIL in children and adolescents with excessive sleepiness (ES) associated with narcolepsy or OSAHS (obstructive sleep apnea/hypopnea), when administered for up to 12 months. Safety and tolerability will be evaluated throughout the study by means of adverse event information, clinical laboratory test results, vital signs measurements, and body weight and height measurements; quarterly physical examination findings; and 12 lead electrocardiograph (ECG) evaluations at the end of the study. In addition, the cognitive and behavioral effects of PROVIGIL will be assessed quarterly as measured by the Child Behavior Checklist for Ages 6-18 (CBCL/6-18), a brief psychiatric interview, and the Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test (KBIT 2).

The investigation is designed to evaluate the comfort, ease of use and performance of a trial nasal mask for the treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) in the home environment.

This study compares the titration pressures achieved through two auto-titrating modalities, a new incremental fixed pressure mode versus routine auto-adjusting pressure mode, in CPAP-naïve obstructive sleep apnea patients. The aim of the study is to verify that this new modality achieves a lower titration pressure.

Standard therapy in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). 30% to 50% are not adherent to this therapy and need an alternative treatment. Hypoglossal nerve stimulation or selective upper airway stimulation has been developed since several years. The aim of this clinical trial is to compare both treatments with each other.

This investigation is a prospective non-blinded and non-randomized clinical investigation. This investigation is to test the interpretation of user instructions of a prototype nasal mask on participants. The clinical investigation will be conducted in New Zealand and participants will interact with the user instructions in a one hour daytime visit. A minimum of 15 participants will participate in this trial.

Background: Adenoidectomy is one of the most common procedures done by the otolaryngologist. The procedure can be performed using the cold method (mainly adenoid curettes) or the hot method (suction diathermy). Both techniques have similar intra and post-operative outcomes. However, the long term clinical outcome in improving the sleep disorder symptoms was never compared between the two methods. Objective: To compare the advantages using the hot method compared to the cold method adenoidectomy in the long term follow up. Methods: A prospective, randomized, single blinded study of children undergoing adenoidectomy between the years 2014-2017. Patients were randomized to hot or cold adenoidectomy techniques. The primary outcome was change of the Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire Score (PSQ) scores one month and one year after surgery.