Active clinical trials for "Apnea"

This multi-site project compares compares the efficiency of a home-based portable monitoring strategy to a standard of care sleep laboratory-based strategy for the diagnosis and positive airway pressure treatment of obstructive sleep apnea in adults.

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a major chronic condition affecting the quality of life of up to one-fifth of all Veterans. Because of disappointingly low adherence to the gold-standard treatment (continuous positive airway pressure therapy - CPAP), the Institute of Medicine has stated that new adherence strategies are needed that improve the quality of care, reduce social and economic costs, and help OSA patients live happier, healthier, and more productive lives through improved clinical management. The combination of a self-management approach along with emerging wireless technologies has strong potential to increase treatment adherence and improve outcomes.

The purpose of this study is to compare a modified AutoSet algorithm running on research hardware versus the traditional AutoSet algorithm running on an S7 AutoSet Spirit. The study will determine if the modified AutoSet algorithm reacts appropriately to obstructive apnoeas and hypopnoeas and provides suitable levels of positive airway pressure compared to the S7 AutoSet Spirit. The hypothesis is that the modified AutoSet algorithm will be more efficacious than the traditional AutoSet algorithm

Recent evidences suggest that obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) can contribute to cardiovascular disease even in the absence of hypertension. However, there are few data regarding the impact of OSA on the preHypertension and Masked Hypertension in apparently normotensive patients with OSA as well as the impact of treatment with continuous positive airway pressure.

The purpose of this randomized prospective study is to compare the efficacy of two approaches to initiate Positive Airway Pressure (PAP) treatment in patients diagnosed as having obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) by portable monitoring (PM) (limited sleep study). One pathway involves attended Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) titration by PSG (full attended sleep study) followed by CPAP treatment. The other pathway involves treatment with auto-adjusting positive airway pressure (APAP)(without a titration). Study Aims: Compare PAP adherence, improvement in subjective sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale), reaction time (Psychomotor vigilance test), quality of life by the Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ), and PAP satisfaction (PAP satisfaction questionnaire) between the two study arms.

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of two different physical activity regimens as complementary or alternative treatment options for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea. A secondary purpose of the study is to examine the effects of these activity regimens on various health consequences of obstructive sleep apnea, including blood pressure, systemic inflammation, and daytime functioning.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV) or continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is better at treating complex sleep apnea over time.

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) worsens the prognosis in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Many of these subjects do not report daytime sleepiness, and therefore, are not considered for OSA treatment with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). There is lack of evidence regarding the impact of CPAP on the long-term prognosis of CAD patients with OSA. The Randomized Intervention with CPAP in CAD and OSA (RICCADSA) trial is designed to address if CPAP treatment reduces the combined rate of new revascularization, myocardial infarction, stroke and cardiovascular mortality over mean follow-up period of 3-years in CAD patients with OSA without daytime sleepiness.Secondary outcomes include cardiovascular biomarkers, cardiac function, maximal exercise capacity and quality of life at baseline, 3-month- and 1-year follow-up as well as polysomnographic findings and adherence to CPAP therapy.

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a highly prevalent condition in hypertensive patients. The renin-angiotension-aldosterone-system (RAAS) has a central role in blood pressure control. An angiotensin-II-antagonist, Losartan, is an effective antihypertensive drug. However, some patients respond to this drug worse than the others, and it is a clinical praxis to either increase the dosage and/or add another drug. There is limited data regarding the impact of antihypertensive drugs in OSA patients, i.e., whether or not OSA may constitute the subgroup of therapy-resistent hypertensive patients. In the literature, there is no data, either, whether or not CPAP treatment may have an additive blood pressure lowering impact in this certain subgroup.

The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of different methods of providing education about sleep apnea and continuous positive airway pressure therapy (CPAP) use and how that education might help to improve health outcomes and the amount of time CPAP is used.