Active clinical trials for "Ascites"

This clinical trial is evaluating the feasibility of using a non-pharmaceutical treatment to improve the symptoms and severity of muscle cramps in patients with cirrhosis. Eligible participants will be randomized to the treatment arm or control group. The treatment phase of the study will last 28 days. Information about participants will be collected including surveys and assessments throughout the study. Please note that only the participants randomized to experimental intervention group (Household Remedy) will be told what the treatment is during the study period. At the conclusion of the study (time of the final follow-up assessments), all participants will be debriefed on the use of concealment in this study as outlined in the protocol regarding the intervention.

This study is being completed for patients with cirrhosis, including patients with a prior history of hepatic encephalopathy (HE) to evaluate the feasibility and benefits of medically-tailored meals as an intervention. Patients will be enrolled from the University of Michigan and will complete the baseline assessments in-person or remotely. In addition participants will complete study related materials before, during and after treatment with medically-tailored meals (MTM). After completing the study meals, participants will return for follow-up or have this visit completed remotely as well as have an observational period for 12 more weeks.

The NASTRA Clinical Trial is a multi-center, randomized, controlled clinical trial designed to determine if treatment with transjugular intrahepatic portasystemic shunts (TIPS) is superior to high volume paracentesis (total paracentesis, TP) for the treatment of refractory ascites due to cirrhosis. Only patients with clinically tense symptomatic ascites (shortness of breath, umbilical hernia, abdominal pain and/or distension, and/or limitation of activity) who have either diuretic-resistant ascites or diuretic-intractable ascites are being studied.

Insertion of a tunnelated peritoneal catheter (PleurX) allows repeated intermittent small volume fluid drainage at home. The treatment may improve the management of ascites and have a beneficial effect on the quality of life. This study aims to evaluate the beneficial and harmful effects of the peritoneal catheter (PleurX) versus repeated large volume paracentesis for patients with cirrhosis and diuretic resistant ascites. The trial is an investigator initiated, randomised, single blind, parallel arm, controlled trial. Tunnelated peritoneal (PleurX) catheter versus large volume paracentesis. All patients will receive ciprofloxacin to prevent spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. We will include 32 adult patients with cirrhosis Duration of trial 18 months. The total duration of follow up is six months. The primary outcome is paracentesis free survival.

Large volume paracentesis (LVP) with albumin administration is the standard of care for patients with refractory ascites complicating end-stage liver disease. However, the use of albumin is frequently limited due to expense and occasional short supply. The goal of this study is to determine if the administration of Fresh Frozen Plasma (FFP) during large volume paracentesis is effective in lowering plasma renin activity by 25% compared to baseline.

Ascites is a frequent complication of patients with portal hypertension. As portal hypertension progresses, a percentage of these patients develop refractory ascites. Management options at that point include either TIPS or intermittent large volume paracentesis (LVP), with its attendant risks, Portal hypertension is accompanied by systemic circulatory dysfunction (decreased systemic vascular resistance and systolic BP), which is exacerbated by large volume paracentesis, with resultant renal and cardiac dysfunction. There are limited options for managing patients with acute decompensation, such as hepatorenal syndrome, although midodrine and other vasoconstrictors have been used in such patients. Midodrine has not been used as a possible therapeutic for ascites. Midodrine however, has been found to change the hemodynamics related to portal hypertension and ascites. There has been also change in mediators related to renal and circulation in studies of short duration (7 days) but not found in studies of 1 month duration, however the clinical effects of midodrine is found for longer duration in other similar conditions. The purpose of the study is to assess the utility of midodrine in patients with obvious systemic circulatory dysfunction (hypotension) in improving the outcome of patients with refractory ascites and change in hemodynamic parameters and its mediators. Specific endpoints include: 1) an objective reduction of the volume/rate of accumulation of ascites and 2) a decrease in the frequency of LVP.

This is an open-label, dose-escalation, phase I trial of the safety and efficacy of anti-CEA intraperitoneal CAR-T infusions for treatment in patients with CEA-expressing adenocarcinoma peritoneal metastases or malignant ascites.

This is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study on the effectiveness of treatment with beta-blockers to prevent decompensation of cirrhosis with portal hypertension.

This study compares Spironolactone, a non-selective aldosterone antagonist, with Eplerenone, a selective aldosterone antagonist, regarding efficacy and hormonal side effects when treating male cirrhotic patients with uncomplicated ascites over a 6 month period. The investigators hypothesis is that Eplerenone is as effective as Spironolactone as treatment of ascites with less side effects such as painful gynecomastia.

Patients with significant ascites and advanced ovarian cancer (AOC), undergoing complex, cytoreductive surgery are at risk of malnutrition, poor quality of life and the risk of hypo- or hypervolemia in a perioperative period. All these factors may cause hemodynamic consequences during anesthesia and surgery, and elevate the risk of morbidity and mortality. The objective of the study is to evaluate, whether slow ascites evacuation for a few days before the surgery for AOC, could 1) influence the hemodynamic consequences of ascites on systemic circulation in patients undergoing surgery, 2) improve patient's quality of life and 3) ability to feed correctly before treatment starts, and thus lower the risk of perioperative morbidity. Eligible patients are those with significant ascites, diagnosed or suspected for AOC, who are scheduled for primary surgery (both upfront cytoreduction or laparoscopic evaluation before neoadjuvant chemotherapy), that cannot be performed within next 7 or more days, for any reason. Patients will be asked to fill in quality of life questionnaire (QLQ). Clinical data, a Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) will be recorded. Patients will be randomized to either intervention arm A - insertion of vascular catheter into abdominal cavity and slow, systematic, daily ascites evacuation, or to observation arm B - standard of care with just observation (acute large volume (>5000ml) paracentesis allowed if needed). Patients in both groups will be encouraged to use oral nutritional support. Randomization will be open, 1:1, for every eligible, consecutive patient. After 7 days patients will be interviewed, asked to fill in QLQ, patient's experience on the treatment survey, a SGA will be recorded. During the first hour of the surgery hemodynamic data from anethetic charts will be recorded along with other clinical data concerning patient's characteristics, surgery details and 30-day postoperative follow-up. A template is provided. The hypothesis of the study is that slow, systematic ascites evacuation few days before surgery for advanced ovarian cancer can facilitate hemodynamic control of systemic circulation of patients undergoing surgery, and improve patients' quality of life, feeding ability before treatment starts. Secondary we would expect lower risk of perioperative morbidity and mortality.