
Effects of Upper Limb Motor and Robotic Training Over Neuroplasticity and Function Capacity
StrokeThe purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare the effects of upper limb training with Induced Constraint Therapy (ICT) or robotic therapy. No placebo therapy is used. Motor function, neurological evaluations and quality of life are assessed for the comparison of the therapies.

Upper Limb Biofeedback Rehabilitation System (RAPAELⓇ Smart Glove Digital Treatment System) Training...
StrokeCerebral Vascular AccidentThis study is to investigate whether the RAPAELⓇ Smart Glove digital treatment system improves the upper extremity function of stroke patients compared to other clinical treatment by measuring serial behavioral and neuroimaging assessments and to find out therapeutic effect or adverse effect and patient's feed back responses

Restoration of Vision After Stroke
StrokeInfarction; Posterior Cerebral Artery1 moreOccipital stroke is associated with homonymous visual field defects (occurring on one side of the visual field). Despite spontaneous recovery, some degree of defect is often permanent. Currently, no treatment exists for such visual field defects.The purpose of this study is to test the efficacy of a type of electrical brain stimulation method, transcranial alternating current stimulation, in reducing these type of visual field defects in their chronic stage.

A Study of tDCS for Swallowing Difficulties in Stroke Patients
StrokeThe primary objective of this study is to investigate whether the dual transcranial direct current stimulation(tDCS) improves the swallowing function of stroke patients.

Fall Prevention and Locomotion Recovery in Post-stroke Patients: A Multimodal Training
StrokeThe study proposes a novel rehabilitative program for the recovery of locomotor abilities in post-acute stroke patients. The hypothesis is that a rehabilitative program which involves a biofeedback cycling training combining voluntary effort and Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) of the leg muscles, and a biofeedback balance training is superior to usual care in improving walking abilities, disability, motor performance, and independence of post-acute stroke patients. The innovative approach is to investigate whether interventions which do not directly involve locomotor functions but movements similar in terms of kinematic patterns and neural commands (e.g. pedaling), or aimed at recovering an essential prerequisite for walking, such as postural control during upright stance, may improve and/or accelerate the recovery of walking abilities. A single-blind randomized controlled study is carried out. Participants are post-acute stroke patients experiencing a first stroke less than 6 months before recruitment, with an adult age, a low level of spasticity of the leg muscles (Modified Ashworth scale <2), no limitations at hip, knee, and ankle joints, and able to sit up to 30 minutes. Subjects are randomized to one of two groups, one performing the novel rehabilitative program in addition to usual care (experimental group), and one performing usual care alone (control group). The experimental program consists of 15 sessions of FES-supported voluntary cycling training followed by 15 sessions of balance training. Both cycling and balance training are supported by a visual biofeedback in order to maximize patients' involvement in the exercise and are performed in addition to usual care. The control group is involved in standard physical therapy which includes stretching, muscular conditioning, exercises for trunk control, standing, and walking training, and upper limb rehabilitation. Both training programs last 6 weeks and patients are trained daily for about 90 minutes. Cycling and balance training last about 20 minutes; thus, patients in the experimental group perform only about 70 minutes of usual care. Participants are evaluated at baseline (T1), after the end of the cycling training or after 3 weeks of usual care (post-treatment, T2), after the end of the whole intervention (post-treatment, T3), and about 6 months after the end of the intervention (follow-up, T4).

Tenecteplase in Wake-up Ischaemic Stroke Trial
Ischemic StrokeStroke1 moreStroke is a leading causes of death and disability. At least 20% of strokes occur during sleep, so- called 'wake up stroke'. Thrombolysis with the clot-busting drug alteplase is effective for acute ischaemic stroke, provided that it is given within 4.5 hours of symptom onset. Patients with wake-up stroke are currently ineligible for clot-busting therapy. Previous studies indicate that many wake-up strokes occur just before awakening. In this study, patients with wake-up stroke will be randomized to thrombolysis with tenecteplase and best standard treatment or to best standard treatment without thrombolysis. Tenecteplase has several potential advantages over alteplase, including very rapid action and that it can be given as a single injection. Prior to thrombolysis, a brain scan must be done to exclude bleeding or significant brain damage as a result from the stroke. We will use a CT scan to inform this decision. CT is used as a routine examination in all stroke patients. Other studies testing clot-busting treatment in wake-up stroke are using alteplase and more complex brain scans, which are not routinely available in the emergency situation in all hospitals.

Ghrelintrial With Patients With Stroke
DEMMMINine-Hole-PEG-Test3 morePatients are assigned to KSW's Stroke Unit as part of the emergency treatment. There the patients are included in the study and treated according to the concept on the Stroke Unit within the complex treatment. The patients are included after clarification and with the consent of the patients. On the morning after the day of intake, the first determination of the ghrelin takes place in the routine blood sampling. Similarly, 48 hours later and 3 months after the stroke, a blood sampling is performed to determine ghrelin. The De Morton Mobility Index (DEMMI), the 9-hole-peg assay and the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) are determined on the day of admission, on the 3rd day, and three months after stroke. This is done within the framework of the routine clarification and treatment on the Stroke Unit.

Effect of External Counter Pulsation on Ischemic Stroke
Ischemic StrokeStroke is a prevalent atherosclerosis vascular disease with high mortality, external counter pulsation (ECP) is an approved noninvasive therapy for angina, congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction, and cardiogenic shock that augments blood flow to cardiac and systemic circuits, which improves the flow volume in the carotid. Though ECP is Ⅱa recommendation for stroke management, no multi-center control clinical study has been reported for prognosis of stroke. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of ECP on stoke. To address this assumption, investigators enroll subjects with ischemic stroke and randomized into control or ECP group, the ECP intervention will be carried out with a standard protocol which involves 35 one-hour sessions (5 days a week) for continuous 7 weeks. The primary endpoint is mRS score in 3 months, secondary endpoints include NIHSS, BI and MMSE score, recurrence of stroke in 3 months, glycolipid metabolism, transcranial doppler (TCD) flow velocities and endothelial function.

Evaluating the Therapeutic Effect of Scalp Acupuncture Treatment for Motor Dysfunction in Ischemic...
Ischemic StrokeHemiplegiaThe investigators design a randomized, control study to evaluate the therapeutic effect of scalp acupuncture using Jiao's motor area for motor dysfunction in ischemic stroke patients using the following outcomes: motor function, activity of daily living,quality of life.

The Technology-assisted, High Intensive, Task-oriented Exercise Trial
StrokeCerebrovascular Disorders6 moreThe interventional study aims to increase the knowledge on arm and hand rehabilitation after stroke within community-based services. The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the feasibility and clinical usefulness of the arm and hand training program (focusing on functional goal- and task-oriented daily life exercises) in combination with the use of an orthotic device in terms of patient compliance and improvement of outcomes. The secondary objective is to compare the effectiveness of the program with or without the use of an orthotic device in a randomized controlled trial.