Colorectal Cancer Screening Based on Predicted Risk
Colorectal CancerThe primary objective is to study the effect of communicating individual CRC risk score and screening recommendations on appropriate screening uptake at six months in individuals at low, moderate and high risk of developing CRC. The secondary objectives: Assess the feasibility of a subsequent larger RCT designed to detect a change in clinical outcomes; Explore the impact of psychological factors (perceived susceptibility for CRC, perceived benefits from and barriers to screening) on appropriate screening uptake and participation rates. The investigators will perform a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) of 880 residents from the canton Vaud (Switzerland) aged between 50 and 69 years. The QCancer calculator will be used to calculate the personalized risk score. The participants in the intervention group will receive a brochure with a personalized risk score and appropriate screening recommendations. The participants in the control group will receive the standard brochure of the Vaud CRC screening program, regardless of participants' risk level. Six months after the intervention, the investigators will measure the proportion of the participants who have undergone appropriate screening. Screening will be considered as appropriate if participants at high risk undertake colonoscopy and participants at low risk undertake FIT. Both tests are appropriate for participants at moderate-risk. The hypothesis is that in the intervention group, individuals will be more likely to undergo screening appropriate to a participant's individual risk level, whereas the choice of the screening test in the control group will not differ between risk levels. This study should advance the field of risk-based screening. This may give insights about how to optimize CRC screening programs and offer to the population screening options with a better risk-benefit balance.
Tucatinib Combined With Trastuzumab and TAS-102 for the Treatment of HER2 Positive Metastatic Colorectal...
Metastatic Colon AdenocarcinomaMetastatic Colorectal Adenocarcinoma4 moreThis phase II trial studies whether tucatinib combined with trastuzumab and TAS-102 works to shrink tumors in patients with HER2 positive colorectal cancer that has spread to other parts of the body (metastatic) and has one of the following gene mutations detected in blood: PIK3CA, KRAS, NRAS, or BRAF V600. Tucatinib is in a class of medications called kinase inhibitors. It works by blocking the action of the abnormal protein that signals tumor cells to multiply. This helps stop or slow the spread of tumor cells. Trastuzumab is a form of targeted therapy because it attaches itself to specific molecules (receptors) on the surface of tumor cells, known as HER2 receptors. When trastuzumab attaches to HER2 receptors, the signals that tell the cells to grow are blocked and the tumor cell may be marked for destruction by the body's immune system. TAS-102 is a combination of 2 drugs; trifluridine and tipiracil. Trifluridine is in a class of medications called thymidine-based nucleoside analogues. It works by stopping the growth of tumor cells. Tipiracil is in a class of medications called thymidine phosphorylase inhibitors. It works by slowing the breakdown of trifluridine by the body. Giving tucatinib, trastuzumab, and TAS-102 together may work better than usual treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer.
Open-label Phase 1b Study of Ulixertinib and Cetuximab or Ulixertinib in Combination With Cetuximab...
Metastatic Colorectal CancerTo find the recommended dose of ulixertinib that can be given in combination with cetuximab and/or encorafenib to patients with unresectable/metastatic CRC and who have received EGFR or BRAF-directed therapy in the past.
A Study of JMT101 in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC)This study is a phase Ⅱ, randomized, controlled, open-label, multi-center study with safety run-in to evaluate the efficacy and safety of JMT101 combined with Irinotecan and SG001 in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC).
Safety and Efficacy of Polyvinyl Alcohol Sodium Acrylate Embolization Microspheres for CRLM
Colorectal Cancer Liver MetastasisThis study is a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of polyvinyl alcohol sodium acrylate embolization microspheres and HepaSphere Microspheres loaded with irinotecan for the treatment of colorectal cancer with hepatic metastases through arterial chemoembolization.
A Study of SI-B003 and BL-B01D1+SI-B003 in the Treatment of Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic...
Esophageal CancerGastric Cancer1 moreObjective: To investigate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of SI-B003 monotherapy and BL-B01D1+SI-B003 dual agents in patients with locally advanced or metastatic esophageal cancer, gastric cancer, colorectal cancer and other gastrointestinal tumors, and to further explore the optimal dose and mode of combination.
The Safety of Ropivacaine TAP Block Combined With Intravenous Lidocaine in Patients Undergoing Colorectal...
Colorectal CancerMany studies have confirmed the analgesic effect of intravenous infusion of lidocaine in abdominal surgery. Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is also often recommended for abdominal surgery. Ropivacaine TAP block and intravenous lidocaine infusion are important components of multimodal analgesia for colorectal surgery. However, both of them are the local anesthetics and the safety of combination is unknown, so we design the study to explore the safety of the synergistic application of ropivacaine TAP block and intravenous lidocaine infusion in patients undergoing colorectal surgery.
Safety and Feasibility of Laparoscopic Intracorporeal Anastomosis for Colorectal Surgery- A Multiple...
Colorectal CancerThe goal of this observational study is to explore the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic intracorporeal anastomosis in colorectal cancer surgery. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. If intracorporeal anastomosis is safe in terms of short-term outcome? 2. If intracorporeal anastomosis can achieve the same oncological outcome as conventional extracorporeal anastomosis?
Combining Intratumoral Flu Vaccine and Systemic Pembrolizumab in Patients With Early pMMR Colorectal...
Colorectal CancerImmune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment has produced striking results in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) of the subtype deficient mismatch repair (dMMR). The majority of patients, however, have proficient MMR (pMMR) tumors, with limited effect of ICIs. The key difference between dMMR and pMMR tumors is the infiltration of cytotoxic T-cells. dMMR tumors have increased infiltration and thus increased efficacy from ICI treatment. The investigators conducted a proof of concept study where the investigators applied an intratumoral (IT) unaltered flu vaccine in ten patients with non-metastatic pMMR CRC. The intervention increased infiltration of cytotoxic T-cells and the immune checkpoint PD-L1, suggesting that IT flu vaccine primes pMMR tumors to ICI treatment. The investigators aim to test the combination of IT flu vaccine and ICI treatment in patients with non-metastatic pMMR CRC in a new trial. The hypothesis is that IT flu vaccine and ICI treatment will synergistically to induce cancer cell death.
Sintilimab,Celecoxib and Regorafenib in the Treatment of Refractory Advanced Colorectal Cancer
Colorectal CancerLiver Metastases1 moreResearch has found that patients with microsatellite instability (dMMR/MSI-H) type colorectal cancer can achieve long-term survival through immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) treatment, but currently accounting for about 95% of MSS type mCRC, the benefits from immune checkpoint inhibitors are very limited. REGONIVO is a Phase Ib study to explore the efficacy and safety of regorafenib in combination with nivolumab in the treatment of gastric cancer and colorectal cancer with MSS. The study enrolled 50 patients with advanced disease, including 25 cases of gastric cancer, 25 cases of colorectal cancer, except for one case of colorectal cancer with MSI-H, and others were MSS type. The results of the study showed that patients with colorectal cancer had an objective response rate (ORR) of 36%.The ORR of liver matestasis vs. lung matestasis is 8.7% vs. 50%. In this study, pMMR /MSS type patients with refractory advanced colorectal cancer without liver metastasis were selected as the subjects. Regorafenib, Sintilimab and Celecoxib were used to evaluate the maximum tolerable dose, objective response rate (ORR), total survival time (OS), progression free survival time (PFS), disease control rate (DCR), response duration (DoR) and safety of the subjects.