Changes of Left Atrial Function and Quality of Life in Patients With Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion...
Atrial FibrillationA total of 105 patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) are scheduled to receive surgical treatment and will be divided into three groups. Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAC), three-dimensional mapping guided radiofrequency ablation and LAAC combined radiofrequency ablation (1:1:1) were performed respectively. All patients were examined three-dimensional and two-dimensional ultrasound before operation, 1 and 3 months after operation to measure left atrial (LA) function. The routine blood test and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein were performed in all patients before operation, 1 day and 1 month after operation. B-type natriuretic peptide was detected in all patients before operation and 1 day, 1 month and 3 months after operation. All patients underwent 6-minute walking test and quality of life score before operation, 1 and 3 months after operation.
Home Hospital for Suddenly Ill Adults
InfectionHeart Failure7 moreThe investigators propose a home hospital model of care that substitutes for treatment in an acute care hospital. Limited studies of the home hospital model have demonstrated that a sizeable proportion of acute care can be delivered in the home with equal quality and safety, reduced cost, and improved patient experience.
Efficacy of Pulmonary Vein Isolation Alone in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
Atrial FibrillationCatheter Ablation1 moreThis study examines non-inferiority of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) to extensive ablation; and reveals the effect of the presence or origin of AF trigger on outcomes of catheter ablation.
First-in-Patient Study for Sing le Dose of M201-A Hydrochloride Injection in Japanese Patients With...
Paroxysmal Atrial FibrillationFirst-in-Patient Study for sing le dose of M201-A hydrochloride injection in Japanese patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.
Risk Factors That Contribute to the Maintenance of Sinus Rhythm
Atrial FibrillationThis is a prospective clinical research study. The objective of this study is to evaluate if clinical risk factors as well as structural features on echocardiography affect the maintenance of sinus rhythm after electrical cardioversion at 30 days. The investigators anticipate 140 patients to be enrolled in the study.
Renal Denervation and pUlmonary Vein isolAtion With cryoabLation on Patients With Atrial Fibrillation...
Paroxysmal Atrial FibrillationHypertensionThe DUAL-ICE study is a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled study. The main purpose is to verify that renal artery cryoablation combined with pulmonary vein cryoablation can reduce the recurrence of atrial fibrillation in hypertensive patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and substandard hypertension, and to further verify the clinical significance of one-stop cardio-renal combined cryoablation therapy for hypertension control.
PFO Occlusion and Atrial Fibrillation
Atrial Fibrillation New OnsetEmbolic Stroke of Undetermined Source1 moreInterventional closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) associates with reduced risk of stroke recurrence in patients with cryptogenic ischemic stroke as reported in the recent CLOSE and REDUCE trials. The long-term follow-up results of the RESPECT and DEFENSE-PFO trial confirmed these findings. PFO closure is therefore recommended in patient with cryptogenic ischemic stroke and PFO according to the current German interdisciplinary guidelines. It is likely that the number of PFO closure procedures will increase significantly in the near future. However, new onset atrial fibrillation (AF) appears to increase in patients following this procedure. In the REDUCE study, new onset atrial fibrillation was detected in 6.6% patients in the PFO closure group compared with 0.4% in the control group (medical treatment); 59% of these patients were diagnosed within the first two weeks following the procedure and 83% within 45 days, respectively. These results were consistent with the CLOSE study: AF was detected in 4.6% patients in the intervention group vs. 0.9% in the control group. Up until today, markers to identify and quantify the individual risk of AF onset are lacking. Furthermore, under-reporting and under-detection of AF occurrence after PFO closure is likely. This study is designed to to assess the prevalence and and identification of electrophysiological and echocardiographic parameters of new-onset AF.
Left Atrial Appendage Electrical Isolation in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
Atrial FibrillationLeft Atrial Appendage2 moreThis project intends to enroll patients with persistent atrial fibrillation who are planning to undergo catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. The two groups of patients were routinely performed atrial fibrillation pulmonary vein isolation and linear ablation with left atrial appendage occlusion. The experimental group received additional left atrial appendage electrical isolation before the left atrial appendage occlusion, and the control group did not perform left atrial appendage electrical isolation. We are intend to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of one-stop operation of left atrial appendage electrical isolation combined with left atrial appendage occlusion in the treatment of persistent atrial fibrillation.
Substrate Versus Trigger Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
Atrial FibrillationThis is a prospective randomized study to assess the safety and efficacy of FIRM (Focal Impulse and Rotor Modulation)-guided ablation for the treatment of symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF). The study hypothesis is that the efficacy of AF elimination at 1 year will be higher by ablating patient-specific AF-sustaining rotors and focal sources by Focal Impulse and Rotor Modulation (FIRM) compared to conventional ablation alone (wide-area PV isolation).
Pulmonary Vein Isolation Versus Botulinum Toxin Injection Plus Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Patients...
Paroxysmal Atrial FibrillationPersistent Atrial FibrillationThe investigators have conducted a prospective, double-blind, randomized study to assess the comparative safety and efficacy of two different treatment strategies, PVI only versus PVI plus BT injection, in patients with persistent and paroxysmal AF. Results were assessed after follow-up of at least 1 years with the use of an implanted monitoring device (IMD).