Active clinical trials for "Influenza, Human"

Multicentric study, Phase III; this study is a randomized, participant- and observer-blind, parallel group evaluation to evaluate the immunogenicity, relative efficacy, safety and reactogenicity of a recombinant quadrivalent hemagglutinin influenza vaccine versus an inactivated quadrivalent influenza vaccine in pediatric subjects and adolescents of 3-17 years of age. Investigational vaccine is indicated for active immunization against influenza A and B for strains contained in the vaccine marketed in the United States for persons 18 years of age or older.

Randomized clinical trial to determine whether a probiotic formulation containing 4 probiotic strains which belong to Lactiplantibacillus plantarum and Pediococcus acidilactici species can boost the immune response to influenza vaccination evaluated at 4 weeks in a population between 50 and 80 years of age. Secondary outcomes comprise evaluation of immune response at 8 weeks after vaccination, percentage of patients with seroconversion, incidence and duration of influenza-like infections and respiratory infections throughout a 4-month period and safety.

This randomized, open-label, active-controlled trial will assess humoral immune responses to a single dose of 2019-20 recombinant hemagglutinin quadrivalent influenza vaccines (RIV4) compared with standard egg-based unadjuvanted quadrivalent influenza vaccines (IIV4) among healthcare personnel (HCP) vaccinated during the previous 2018-19 season with IIV4. The trial will be conducted at two hospital sites in Israel during the 2019-20 influenza season among HCP who were enrolled in the Study of Healthcare Personnel with Influenza and other Respiratory Viruses in Israel (SHIRI).

As part of the fight against COVID-19, the UK government has announced its most comprehensive flu campaign to date (https://www.gov.uk/government/news/most-comprehensive-flu-programme-in-uk-history-will-be-rolled-out-this-winter). This should not be surpising: every year NHS hospitals experience an overwhelming number of influenza cases, and COVID-19 increases this concern. As in previous years, the flu vaccine is free at the point of care for people 65 and over. New this year is that later in the season the vaccine will be made available free at the point of care for people 50 and over. However, if people refuse to take the vaccine this comprehensive program cannot benefit public health. The degree to which vaccine hesitancy is expressed varies across characteristics of the vaccine considered and the time and place it is offered, and across characteristics of the person's perceptions of complacency, convenience, confidence, calculations, and communal responsibility, i.e. the "5Cs". Information campaigns can be used to influence all 5Cs, and public facing information is often a necessary component of public health campaigns that may also include structural components. Largely, information campaigns can be viewed as a type of educational intervention. Educational interventions may fall short of what is needed to alter people's intentions to vaccinate where they focus on system 1 rational thinking processes and neglect system 2 automatic thinking processes. To be more effective, public health messages must be tailored to align with the "beliefs, attitudes, and motivations" of the very people they intend to influence. Fact-led educational interventions to increase parents' intentions to vaccinate their children are particularly ineffective where more subtle content opposes the recipient's deep-seated values. In a different context, recycling behaviour, previous research demonstrated that messages aligned with people's deep-seated values (i.e. the moral foundations that underlie political ideologies) are more likely to promote desired behavioural intentions than unaligned messages. The present research expands the scope of previous research in two ways. First, rather than investigating parental attitudes towards vaccination, the investigators will look at people's intentions to self-vaccinate. Second, the investigators will explore the effectiveness of messages aligned with the moral foundations that underlie individual's political ideologies on their intentions to be vaccinated.

Influenza virus has high morbidity rates during annual epidemics, with certain high-risk groups being particularly susceptible to complications and mortality. Vaccination is the main prevention measure, alongside with hygiene measures. Nevertheless, vaccine coverage remains low. Some studies suggest that short, standardized interventions can improve coverage of several vaccines. Hypothesis: Brief Intervention is an effective tool in improving vaccination coverage in people who have initially rejected it. Objective: To determine the effectiveness of a Brief Intervention in increasing influenza vaccination (IIV) coverage compared with the usual advice in people who refuse it. Method: cluster randomized clinical trial. The study population was individuals with high risk factors who initially refused the influenza vaccine. Professionals participants (doctors and nurses) were assigned randomly to the intervention group (brief intervention) and the control group (usual advice).

This study will compare the different immune responses to Influenza A (H5N1) Virus Monovalent Vaccine with and without the AS03 adjuvant. The Influenza A (H5N1) Virus Monovalent Vaccine with AS03 adjuvant vaccine is approved for use for adults to protect against flu caused by the A/H5N1 "bird flu" virus in Europe but none of the vaccines to be used in the study are approved for use in the United States. The results of this study will help researchers learn about better ways to vaccinate people against the H5N1 flu.

The purpose of this study is to investigate the responses to licensed trivalent, inactivated influenza vaccine (TIV) delivered by different routes: intramuscular (IM) and intradermal (ID) and to the live, attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) administered intranasally -- all given to generally healthy male and female adult volunteers.

Influenza morbidity and mortality cause a substantial financial burden to the NHS and to the UK as a whole. Influenza vaccine is safe and effective but is required annually because the circulating strain of virus changes each year. In the UK in 2012, the Chief Medical Officer (CMO) recommended that at least 75% of elderly people (aged 65+) and 75% people under 65 with certain chronic conditions (e.g. chronic heart disease, diabetes, asthma, etc) should be vaccinated. While primary care practices are achieving these targets for elderly patients, those set for younger patients with chronic conditions are not being met, with a third of patients being missed in the 2011/12 flu season and with no substantial improvements in uptake in the past decade. Therefore strategies to increase flu vaccine uptake in these patients are required. Previous trials have shown that patient reminders can increase vaccine uptake and in particular, text messaging has shown to work in some populations in the United States as a cheap, simple and effective reminder. However, whether the same is true in UK general practice is unclear. The use of text messaging in the NHS for appointment reminders is also increasing as it is cheap, quick and effective. Text messaging is already used in roughly 30% of practices to remind patients about their flu vaccine but there has been no trial addressing its effectiveness. Therefore, we propose a trial of a text messaging flu vaccine reminder in patients aged under 65 who have a chronic condition. We hypothesise that practices that send a text message will have increased flu vaccine uptake.

The objective of this study was to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of using a statewide immunization information system (IIS) to send seasonal influenza vaccine reminders from Local Health Departments (LHDs), targeting children with high-risk conditions.

Background: It is well established that live attenuated organisms can be highly effective vaccines, immune responses elicited can often be of greater magnitude and of longer duration than those produced by non-living antigens and are often able to confer protection after a single dose. Unlike killed influenza vaccine preparations injected by the parenteral route, live influenza vaccines are able to induce potent secretory (mainly IgA) antibody responses in the airway mucosae and can also evoke cell mediated responses. T cell proliferation, cytokine production, cytotoxic T cell responses and antibody-dependent cell cytotoxicity have all been elicited by live attenuated vaccines. There has been a history of the use of live attenuated flu vaccines as safe and effective vaccines for the prevention of flu in animals and humans. Live-attenuated cold-adapted influenza vaccines have been proved to be highly efficacious to protect against clinical fly symptoms. Among these, FluMist, a nasal vaccine formulation developed by Medimmune Inc, has been approved by the US FDA. Recent side by side clinical trials have demonstrated that this nasal vaccine was significantly superior to conventional killed flu vaccine in protecting against flu symptoms. Sublingual administration of live influenza virus at a dose lethal by the nasal route was well tolerated and did not redirect virus to the olfactory bulb. In addition, in a recent Phase I clinical study (NCT00820144) conducted in France, the sublingual administration of recombinant cholera toxin B subunit (rCTB,up to 1 mg) in healthy adult volunteers was found to be safe. A major issue has arisen regarding the ease with which vaccines could be administered to young children, especially infants, and to elderly subjects in whom nasal vaccination has not been possible and/or approved due to difficulties of administering nasal vaccines in infants and to undesired side effects related to frequent rhinitis and sneezing episodes in elderly subjects. This study is designed to investigate the safety, tolerability and immunogenicity of a new route of administration of vaccines, using the nasal FluMist formulation as prototype vaccine. Objectives: To evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of a nasal and sublingual influenza virus vaccine (FluMist) in healthy adult volunteers Study design: This will be a randomized study on a total 40 subjects; each 20 subjects will receive vaccine via nasal and sublingual route, respectively