Active clinical trials for "Hyperoxia"

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn about the mechanisms of oxygen toxicity in scuba divers. The main questions it aims to answer are: How does the training of respiratory muscles affect oxygen toxicity? How do environmental factors, such as sleep deprivation, the ingestion of commonly utilized medications, and chronic exposure to carbon dioxide, impact the risk of oxygen toxicity? How does immersion in water affect the development of oxygen toxicity? Participants will be asked to do the following: Undergo a basic screening exam composed of health history, vital signs, and some respiratory function tests Train their respiratory muscles at regular intervals Exercise on a cycle ergometer both in dry conditions and underwater/under pressure in the context of medication, sleep deprivation, or carbon dioxide exposure Researchers will compare the performance of each subject before and after the possible interventions described above to see if there are changes in exercise performance, respiratory function, cerebral blood flow, and levels of gene expression.

In this preliminary, crossover investigation the investigators will examine the effect of oxygen supplementation on the recovery of breathing in the immediate post-anesthesia period.

Oxygen is the most commonly administered therapy in critical illness. Accumulating evidence suggests that patients often achieve supra-physiological levels of oxygenation in the critical care environment. Furthermore, hyperoxia related complications following cardiac arrest, myocardial infarction and stroke have also been reported. The underlying mechanisms of hyperoxia mediated injury remain poorly understood and there are currently no human in vivo studies exploring the relationship between hyperoxia and direct pulmonary injury and inflammation as well as distant organ injury. The current trial is a mechanistic study designed to evaluate the effects of prolonged administration of high-flow oxygen (hyperoxia) on pulmonary and systemic inflammation. The study is a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of high-flow nasal oxygen therapy versus matching placebo (synthetic medical air). We will also incorporate a model of acute lung injury induced by inhaled endotoxin (LPS) in healthy human volunteers. Healthy volunteers will undergo bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) at 6 hours post-intervention to enable measurement of pulmonary and systemic markers of inflammation, oxidative stress and cellular injury.

Premature infants often receive respiratory support and supplemental oxygen for a prolonged period of time during their admission in the NICU. While maintaining the oxygen saturation within a narrow target range is important to prevent morbidity, manual oxygen titration can be very challenging. Automatic titration by a controller has been proven to be more effective. However, to date the performance of different controllers has not been compared. The proposed randomized crossover trial Comparing Oxygen Controllers in Preterm InfanTs (COCkPIT) is designed to compare the effect on time spent within target range. The results of this trial will help determining which algorithm is most successful in controlling oxygen, improve future developments in automated oxygen control and ultimately reduce the morbidity associated with hypoxemia and hyperoxemia.

Most premature babies require oxygen therapy. There is uncertainty about what oxygen levels are the best. The oxygen levels in the blood are measured using a monitor called a saturation monitor and the oxygen the baby breathes is adjusted to keep the level in a target range. Although there is evidence that lower oxygen levels maybe harmful, it is not known how high they need to be for maximum benefit. Very high levels are also harmful. Saturation monitors are not very good for checking for high oxygen levels. For this a different kind of monitor, called a transcutaneous monitor, is better. Keeping oxygen levels stable is usually done by nurses adjusting the oxygen levels by hand (manual control). There is also equipment available that can do this automatically (servo control). It is not known which is best. Studies of automated control have shown that infants spend more time within their intended target oxygen saturation range. These have not included measurements of transcutaneous oxygen. There are no previous studies directly comparing automated respiratory devices. The investigators aim to show the transcutaneous oxygen levels as well as the oxygen saturation levels when babies have their oxygen adjusted using two automated (servo) control devices delivering nasal high flow. For a period of 12 hours each baby will have their oxygen adjusted automatically using each devices for 6 hours respectively. The investigators will compare the range of oxygen levels that are seen between the two respiratory devices.

The study is designed to evaluate the feasibility, safety and clinical utility of using an adaptive model to wean oxygen by computer assistance. Investigators hypothesize that weaning oxygen using this model will decrease duration of exposure to hyperoxia, decrease duration of exposure to hypoxia, decrease exposure to increased oxygen requirement, and decrease the number of manual fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) adjustments as compared to manual weaning of oxygen therapy.

The goal of this RCT is to demonstrate that, in neonatal anesthesia, the use of Lung Ultrasound (LUS) to guide choice of best Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (Peep) - the one that efficiently avoids lung atelectasis - leads to better gas exchange in the lung thus can lead to reduction of FiO2 applied to ventilatory setting in order to achieve same peripheral saturations of oxygen (SpO2). Specific aims of the study are: to determine if LUS-guided PEEP choice in neonatal anesthesia, compared to standard PEEP choice, can lead to reduction of FiO2 applied to the ventilatory setting in order to maintain same SpO2s. to determine if patients treated with LUS-guided PEEP will develop less postoperative pulmonary complications in the first 24 hours. to compare static respiratory system compliance between groups. to determine if there is a significant difference in hemodynamic parameters and amount of fluids infused or need for vasopressors between the two groups.

OPTI-Oxygen is a single center, stepped wedged, cluster-randomized, un-blinded, pragmatic, comparing the use of a combined inspired oxygen (FiO2) and peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) titration strategy utilizing electronic health records (EHR) based electronic alerts (e-alerts) for respiratory therapists in mechanically ventilated critically ill adults. All eligible mechanically ventilated patients, FiO2 titration and SpO2 goal range will be based on the correlation between SpO2 and arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2). E-alerts will be sent in the intervention arm as reminders for FiO2 titration. In the control arm, patients will have oxygen titrated per current standard of care (SpO2=88-92%, titrate FiO2 at least every 4 hours).

The investigator's research proposal is a randomized controlled study evaluating two different monitoring strategies to titrate FiO2 in order to rapidly and safely achieve optimal SatO2 targets during early ROSC of non-traumatic OHCA in adults. Primary hypothesis: Monitoring transport to hospital of sustained ROSC of OHCA patients using multiple wavelength detectors that allow ORI continuous measurement will reduce hyperoxia and hypoxia burden associated with transport. Secondary hypothesis: Multiple wavelength detectors allowing ORI continuous measurement will reduce hyperoxia at ER admission as measured via blood gas analysis. Tertiary study hypothesis: Multiple wavelength detectors allowing ORI continuous measurement will reduce reperfusion neuronal injury measured through NSE levels at 48h post ROSC

The investigators aim to measure the effect of targeting premature babies to a slightly higher oxygen saturation target range (92-97%) than routinely used, for a brief period, to plan a future larger study of the effect of this on clinical outcomes. It is still unclear exactly what levels of oxygen premature babies need - both too little or too much oxygen in the first weeks after birth may be harmful. Previous studies used saturation monitoring (SpO2), where a small probe shines light through the skin and calculates how much oxygen is carried in the blood. These studies demonstrated using an SpO2 range of 91-95% rather than 85-89% was associated with more babies surviving and fewer babies suffering from a bowel condition called necrotising enterocolitis (NEC). However, targeting oxygen higher increased the number of infants who needed treatment for an eye condition called retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). It is possible an SpO2 range higher than 91-95% would be associated with even better survival. It is also possible that a higher range might not improve survival but could increase the need for ROP treatment. Infants born at less than 29 weeks gestation, greater than 48 hours of age and receiving supplementary oxygen would be eligible for inclusion. The study is at the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh. Total study time is 12 hours for each infant (6 hours at the standard 90-95% range used in our unit, and 6 hours at 92-97%). It is a crossover study with infants acting as their own controls. Based on previous research the investigators are confident these oxygen levels will not be dangerously high. To provide an additional measure of oxygen the investigators will also use a transcutaneous monitor for the 12 hour study period, which fastens gently to the skin and measures oxygen and carbon dioxide levels on the skin surface.