Active clinical trials for "Hypertrophy"

The purpose of this study is to compare two different types of scopes that can be used for HoLEP. HoLEP is performed through the urethra using a Laser scope to remove obstructing prostate tissue. Laser scopes come in different sizes (diameters).

Patients with HOCM and severe LVOT obstruction can remain asymptomatic while significant cellular and structural changes of the heart (adverse remodeling) may occur preceding heart failure and rhythm disorders. Hence, preventing adverse remodeling through LVOT desobstruction may have significant impact on cardiac function and geometry in this particular population, as it is in symptomatic patients. The investigators will assess functional and structural characteristics of the myocardium in asymptomatic vs. symptomatic patients with severe LVOT obstruction before and after PTSMA, using advanced imaging studies with LGE-CMR and echocardiography.

This research study has been designed to test whether a drug called trientine dihydrochloride (also called Cufence) reduces heart muscle thickening, improves exercise capacity, improves heart function and reduces abnormal heart rhythms in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). The study is also assessing how trientine works in HCM. Participants will be prescribed either trientine or placebo, for a period of 12 months.

The goal of this treatment study is to determine if doing lateral pharyngoplasty with tonsillectomy is better for children than doing tonsillectomy alone. The main questions it aims to answer are: Do children experience less pain after surgery when lateral pharyngoplasty is performed with tonsillectomy compared to tonsillectomy alone? Do children eat/drink better when lateral pharyngoplasty is performed with tonsillectomy compared to tonsillectomy alone? Is there a lower risk of bleeding after tonsillectomy when lateral pharyngoplasty is performed? Researchers will compare children undergoing tonsillectomy and lateral pharyngoplasty with children undergoing tonsillectomy alone to see if the participants experience less pain, better oral intake, and less bleeding complications after surgery. Parents of participants will be asked to record pain scores and pain medications given, approximate amounts of daily oral intake, and any complications after surgery.

Laser treatment of hypertrophic burn scars has become increasingly popular for improving scarring in burn survivors. Despite its common use, there a gap in knowledge regrading randomized control trials that demonstrate whether the laser is beneficial. Such a trial is important because if it shows the laser does work, it would provide the evidence to make such treatments more accessible to all patients. Furthermore, there is no knowledge whether the burn injury used to remove tissue is beneficial or not. This study aims to evaluate the laser treatment, removal of similar tissue amounts with 0.5mm punch biopsies, to controls to fill this knowledge gap. The hypothesis is the laser is beneficial at improving patient's burn scars. Also the punch biopsies work better at improving scars by removing tissue without burning and injuring the surrounding tissue as the laser does. To evaluate these treatments (laser, punch biopsies, and no treatment), 3 small areas will be chosen in a study scar area that meets specific criteria to receive . Patients will still be able to receive laser and burn reconstruction procedures in all other areas not involving the study scar area that are clinically indicated. In the study, the scar will be evaluated with photographs, surveys, and tissue samples taken either while under anesthesia except for one set taken with numbing medicine. The tissue samples will be looked at under a microscope to see how the treatments change the scar tissue. The tissue will also have tests done to evaluate how the laser impacts genes from cells in the scar tissue. Lastly, to understand how reconstructive procedures (laser and surgical treatments) change a patient's quality of life, patients will be asked a limited set of questions to learn more how these procedures improve their lives.

The present trial is undertaken as a pilot study on selected patients, to evaluate the ability of acute hemodynamic testing to optimize pacing therapy and to predict the response of Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy (OHCM) to pacing, in terms of reduction of Left Ventricular Outflow Tract (LVOT) pressure gradient and functional capacity improvement. The Primary Objective is to demonstrate a long-term reduction in LVOT obstruction at rest and/or after Valsalva/Exercise > 30% in patients responding to acute stimulation test

After tooth extraction, there is a subsequent bone loss as a part of the natural healing of the tissue. Up to 50% of bone loss occurs during the first three months after extraction, jeopardizing a possible implant treatment. Alveolar ridge preservation techniques reduce bone loss, allowing a future implant treatment. Different bone filling materials have been used with good clinical results. The second-generation platelet concentrates (L-PRF) have recently been shown to induce bone regeneration when filling the socket after extraction, with significant biological and economic advantages. The hypothesis of this study is to test whether or not the use of L-PRF in alveolar ridge preservation results in a non-inferior horizontal radiographic change compared with the combination of a xenogeneic bone substitute with a collagen matrix.

The aim of this randomized trial is to compare the improvement in exercise capacity among patients with highly symptomatic hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy despite optimal medical treatment who undergo alcohol septal ablation (ASA) or surgical septal myectomy (SSM).

The electronic health record contains vast amounts of cardiovascular data, including potential clues that an individual may have unrecognized cardiac conditions. One important example is the finding of thickened heart muscle -- known as left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) -- on echocardiograms (heart ultrasounds). If the underlying cause of LVH is untreated, individuals are at an increased risk of developing more severe pathology. As the most common cause of LVH, hypertension and its downstream consequences account for more cardiovascular deaths than any other modifiable risk factor. Critically, many individuals have signs of cardiac damage from hypertension before it is diagnosed or treated. Despite this evidence, there are often gaps in healthcare delivery that contribute to substandard recognition and treatment. Thus, there is an urgent need to validate alternative cost-effective screening and intervention strategies. Echocardiograms are ordered by many specialties and for numerous indications. Even when LVH is reported, the finding may be underappreciated and not prompt further evaluation. Whether data from prior echocardiograms can be harnessed to improve patient care through a centralized intervention is unknown. Accordingly, the goal of this randomized pragmatic clinical trial is to study the impact of a centralized clinical support pathway on the diagnosis and treatment of hypertension and the recognition of LVH-associated diseases in individuals with evidence of thickened heart muscle on previously performed echocardiograms.

The purpose of this study is to collect long-term safety and tolerability data for aficamten (CK-3773274)